Conducting robust ecological analyses with climate data

Although the number of studies discerning the impact of climate change on ecological systems continues to increase, there has been relatively little sharing of the lessons learnt when accumulating this evidence. At a recent workshop entitled ‘Using climate data in ecological research’ held at the UK...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Oikos Ročník 126; číslo 11; s. 1533 - 1541
Hlavní autoři: Suggitt, Andrew J., Platts, Philip J., Barata, Izabela M., Bennie, Jonathan J., Burgess, Malcolm D., Bystriakova, Nadia, Duffield, Simon, Ewing, Steven R., Gillingham, Phillipa K., Harper, Anna B., Hartley, Andrew J., Hemming, Deborah L., Maclean, Ilya M. D., Maltby, Katherine, Marshall, Harry H., Morecroft, Mike D., Pearce‐Higgins, James W., Pearce‐Kelly, Paul, Phillimore, Albert B., Price, Jeff T., Pyke, Ayesha, Stewart, James E., Warren, Rachel, Hill, Jane K.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Oxford, UK Nordic Society Oikos 01.11.2017
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Témata:
Climate
Climate change
Climate science
Climatic data
Data processing
Ecological monitoring
Ecological research
Ecologists
Ecology
Environmental impact
Forum
Handling
Internet
meteorological data
Repositories
Robustness
Scientific papers
Scientists
Spatial analysis
Spatial discrimination
Uncertainty
United Kingdom
Workshops
United Kingdom
ISSN:0030-1299, 1600-0706
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Although the number of studies discerning the impact of climate change on ecological systems continues to increase, there has been relatively little sharing of the lessons learnt when accumulating this evidence. At a recent workshop entitled ‘Using climate data in ecological research’ held at the UK Met Office, ecologists and climate scientists came together to discuss the robust analysis of climate data in ecology. The discussions identified three common pitfalls encountered by ecologists: 1) selection of inappropriate spatial resolutions for analysis; 2) improper use of publically available data or code; and 3) insufficient representation of the uncertainties behind the adopted approach. Here, we discuss how these pitfalls can be avoided, before suggesting ways that both ecology and climate science can move forward. Our main recommendation is that ecologists and climate scientists collaborate more closely, on grant proposals and scientific publications, and informally through online media and workshops. More sharing of data and code (e.g. via online repositories), lessons and guidance would help to reconcile differing approaches to the robust handling of data. We call on ecologists to think critically about which aspects of the climate are relevant to their study system, and to acknowledge and actively explore uncertainty in all types of climate data. And we call on climate scientists to make simple estimates of uncertainty available to the wider research community. Through steps such as these, we will improve our ability to robustly attribute observed ecological changes to climate or other factors, while providing the sort of influential, comprehensive analyses that efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change so urgently require. Synthesis Climate is a key driver of ecological patterns and processes, and as such has been the subject of huge research effort over a number of decades. Yet although the literature on the subject is vast, ecologists still succumb to a number of common pitfalls when analysing climate data. In this paper we share some of the lessons and techniques for avoiding these pitfalls, before suggesting some better ways forward, namely: more collaboration, more communication, and more sharing of data and code. By working more closely together, ecologists and climatologists will generate outputs that are far more useful and tractable for society.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-1299
1600-0706
DOI:10.1111/oik.04203