Interpolation bias for the inverse compositional Gauss–Newton algorithm in digital image correlation

•The interpolation biases of FA-NR algorithm and IC-GN algorithm can be significantly different.•The reference image gradient estimation can strongly influence the interpolation bias.•The formulas of interpolation bias for the IC-GN algorithms are derived.•The role of gradient estimation is thorough...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Optics and lasers in engineering Ročník 100; s. 267 - 278
Hlavní autoři: Su, Yong, Zhang, Qingchuan, Xu, Xiaohai, Gao, Zeren, Wu, Shangquan
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2018
Témata:
Digital image correlation
Fourier analysis
Gradient estimator
Interpolation bias
Inverse compositional Gauss–Newton algorithm
99-00
Interpolation bias
Inverse compositional Gauss–Newton algorithm
00-01
Gradient estimator
Fourier analysis
Digital image correlation
ISSN:0143-8166, 1873-0302
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:•The interpolation biases of FA-NR algorithm and IC-GN algorithm can be significantly different.•The reference image gradient estimation can strongly influence the interpolation bias.•The formulas of interpolation bias for the IC-GN algorithms are derived.•The role of gradient estimation is thoroughly studies.•Source codes are uploaded. It is believed that the classic forward additive Newton–Raphson (FA-NR) algorithm and the recently introduced inverse compositional Gauss–Newton (IC-GN) algorithm give rise to roughly equal interpolation bias. Questioning the correctness of this statement, this paper presents a thorough analysis of interpolation bias for the IC-GN algorithm. A theoretical model is built to analytically characterize the dependence of interpolation bias upon speckle image, target image interpolation, and reference image gradient estimation. The interpolation biases of the FA-NR algorithm and the IC-GN algorithm can be significantly different, whose relative difference can exceed 80%. For the IC-GN algorithm, the gradient estimator can strongly affect the interpolation bias; the relative difference can reach 178%. Since the mean bias errors are insensitive to image noise, the theoretical model proposed remains valid in the presence of noise. To provide more implementation details, source codes are uploaded as a supplement.
ISSN:0143-8166
1873-0302
DOI:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.09.013