The Relationship between Intercoder Reliability of Data Extraction and Effect Measure Calculation in Single-Case Meta-Analysis

Meta-analyzing data from single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) usually requires data extraction, a process by which numerical values are obtained from linear graphs in primary studies, prior to calculating and aggregating single-case effect measures. Existing research suggests data extraction yie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:School psychology review Jg. 54; H. 3; S. 291 - 298
Hauptverfasser: Drevon, Daniel D., Peart, Allison M., Koval, Elizabeth T.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Routledge 04.05.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:2372-966X, 2372-966X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Meta-analyzing data from single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) usually requires data extraction, a process by which numerical values are obtained from linear graphs in primary studies, prior to calculating and aggregating single-case effect measures. Existing research suggests data extraction yields reliable and valid data; however, we have an incomplete understanding of the downstream effects of relying on data extracted by two or more people. This study was undertaken to enhance that understanding in the context of SCEDs published in school psychology journals. Data for 91 unique outcomes across 67 cases in 20 SCEDs were extracted by two data extractors. Four different single-case effect measures were calculated using data extracted by each data extractor and then compared to determine the similarity of the effect measures. Overall, intercoder reliability metrics suggested a high degree of agreement, and there were minimal differences in single-case effect measures calculated from data extracted by different researchers. Intercoder reliability metrics and differences in single-case effect measures were generally negatively related, though the strength varied depending on the single-case effect measure. Hence, it is unlikely that the small differences in effect measure estimates due to the slight unreliability of the data extraction process would have a considerable impact on the interpretation of single-case effect measures. Impact Statement Two people extracted highly similar numerical data from the same linear graphs using plot digitizing software. Differences in calculations across data extracted by two people were trivial. Results suggest researchers can likely have confidence in the calculation of effect measures aggregated in meta-analyses of single-case experimental designs, provided they achieve comparable levels of agreement amongst data extractors.
AbstractList Meta-analyzing data from single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) usually requires data extraction, a process by which numerical values are obtained from linear graphs in primary studies, prior to calculating and aggregating single-case effect measures. Existing research suggests data extraction yields reliable and valid data; however, we have an incomplete understanding of the downstream effects of relying on data extracted by two or more people. This study was undertaken to enhance that understanding in the context of SCEDs published in school psychology journals. Data for 91 unique outcomes across 67 cases in 20 SCEDs were extracted by two data extractors. Four different single-case effect measures were calculated using data extracted by each data extractor and then compared to determine the similarity of the effect measures. Overall, intercoder reliability metrics suggested a high degree of agreement, and there were minimal differences in single-case effect measures calculated from data extracted by different researchers. Intercoder reliability metrics and differences in single-case effect measures were generally negatively related, though the strength varied depending on the single-case effect measure. Hence, it is unlikely that the small differences in effect measure estimates due to the slight unreliability of the data extraction process would have a considerable impact on the interpretation of single-case effect measures. Impact Statement Two people extracted highly similar numerical data from the same linear graphs using plot digitizing software. Differences in calculations across data extracted by two people were trivial. Results suggest researchers can likely have confidence in the calculation of effect measures aggregated in meta-analyses of single-case experimental designs, provided they achieve comparable levels of agreement amongst data extractors.
Author Koval, Elizabeth T.
Drevon, Daniel D.
Peart, Allison M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daniel D.
  surname: Drevon
  fullname: Drevon, Daniel D.
  organization: Central Michigan University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Allison M.
  surname: Peart
  fullname: Peart, Allison M.
  organization: Central Michigan University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Elizabeth T.
  surname: Koval
  fullname: Koval, Elizabeth T.
  organization: Central Michigan University
BookMark eNqFkEFLAzEQhYNUsK3-BCF_YGs22Xa3eLHUqoWKoBW8LbPJxEbSbElSai_-dru2gnjQ0wzz5nvwXoe0XO2QkPOU9VJWsAsucj4cDF56nHHR4zwXBedHpN3ck0Zo_dhPSCeEN8aYEBlvk4_5AukjWoimdmFhVrTCuEF0dOoielkr9I1uoDLWxC2tNb2GCHTyHj3IhqLgFJ1ojTLSe4Sw9kjHYOV6b0qNo0_GvVpMxhBw9xIhGTmw22DCKTnWYAOeHWaXPN9M5uO7ZPZwOx2PZokUKY-JEKqfcZCQ5kpAwYpMc82LLM8ESt1XfUSWs2GuhQQ14ExWHNOqUgVqpSrNRJf0977S1yF41OXKmyX4bZmysimx_C6xbEosDyXuuMtfnDTxK9YuvbH_0ld72jhd-yVsam9VGWFra689OGlCKf62-ATlEJB0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_2372966X_2025_2522589
crossref_primary_10_1080_2372966X_2025_2497709
Cites_doi 10.4324/9781315517698-15
10.1177/0145445516673998
10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
10.1037/met0000019
10.3758/BRM.41.1.177
10.1002/pits.22012
10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.008
10.1177/1098300715573630
10.1002/pits.22359
10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.002
10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
10.1177/0145445515616105
10.1080/17489539.2021.1886412
10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.031
10.1177/0741932512452794
10.1080/02796015.2014.12087427
10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.001
10.1080/00273171.2014.973989
10.1177/0145445516645763
10.1037/spq0000305
10.1007/s40614-021-00284-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 National Association of School Psychologists 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 National Association of School Psychologists 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1080/2372966X.2023.2273822
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
Psychology
EISSN 2372-966X
EndPage 298
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_2372966X_2023_2273822
2273822
Genre Research Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Faculty Research and Creative Endeavors committee at Central Michigan University
GroupedDBID --Z
-~X
0-V
0BK
0R~
8A4
8R4
8R5
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAHSB
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAYJJ
AAZJI
AAZMC
ABIVO
ABLIJ
ABOPQ
ABPPZ
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACNCT
ADAHI
ADBBV
ADKVQ
AEAQA
AEFOU
AEISY
AEZRU
AFKRA
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIKWM
AIYEW
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALSLI
AQTUD
ARALO
AZQEC
BENPR
BMOTO
BOHLJ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CJNVE
DGFLZ
EBS
EJD
EMG
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
H13
HF~
HVGLF
IAO
ICJ
ICO
IEA
IER
INH
IOF
IPC
IPO
IPY
ITC
L7B
M0P
M2M
M4Z
P2P
PQQKQ
PROAC
PZZ
Q2X
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
RWL
RXW
S0X
SJN
TAE
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TED
TFH
TFL
TFW
TN5
TNTFI
TUROJ
TZEDD
UKHRP
WH7
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-33d542aca17d3a8084f2f284743ecf5d5ee07097f3cad620cb2e1bbd8efddbf03
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 2
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001088399800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2372-966X
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 07:51:34 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:14:23 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:45:13 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c312t-33d542aca17d3a8084f2f284743ecf5d5ee07097f3cad620cb2e1bbd8efddbf03
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_2372966X_2023_2273822
crossref_primary_10_1080_2372966X_2023_2273822
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_2372966X_2023_2273822
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-05-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-05-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-05-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle School psychology review
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Routledge
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
References e_1_3_2_27_1
e_1_3_2_20_1
e_1_3_2_21_1
e_1_3_2_22_1
e_1_3_2_23_1
e_1_3_2_24_1
e_1_3_2_25_1
e_1_3_2_26_1
Card N. A. (e_1_3_2_5_1) 2015
e_1_3_2_16_1
e_1_3_2_9_1
e_1_3_2_17_1
e_1_3_2_8_1
e_1_3_2_18_1
e_1_3_2_7_1
e_1_3_2_19_1
e_1_3_2_2_1
e_1_3_2_10_1
e_1_3_2_11_1
e_1_3_2_6_1
e_1_3_2_12_1
e_1_3_2_13_1
e_1_3_2_4_1
e_1_3_2_14_1
e_1_3_2_3_1
e_1_3_2_15_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_2_19_1
  doi: 10.4324/9781315517698-15
– ident: e_1_3_2_6_1
  doi: 10.1177/0145445516673998
– ident: e_1_3_2_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
– ident: e_1_3_2_18_1
  doi: 10.1037/met0000019
– ident: e_1_3_2_24_1
  doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.177
– ident: e_1_3_2_26_1
  doi: 10.1002/pits.22012
– ident: e_1_3_2_10_1
– ident: e_1_3_2_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.008
– ident: e_1_3_2_13_1
  doi: 10.1177/1098300715573630
– ident: e_1_3_2_21_1
  doi: 10.1002/pits.22359
– volume-title: Applied meta-analysis for social science research
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_3_2_5_1
– ident: e_1_3_2_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.002
– ident: e_1_3_2_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
– ident: e_1_3_2_8_1
  doi: 10.1177/0145445515616105
– ident: e_1_3_2_25_1
  doi: 10.1080/17489539.2021.1886412
– ident: e_1_3_2_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.031
– ident: e_1_3_2_11_1
  doi: 10.1177/0741932512452794
– ident: e_1_3_2_3_1
  doi: 10.1080/02796015.2014.12087427
– ident: e_1_3_2_23_1
– ident: e_1_3_2_20_1
– ident: e_1_3_2_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.001
– ident: e_1_3_2_9_1
  doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.973989
– ident: e_1_3_2_15_1
  doi: 10.1177/0145445516645763
– ident: e_1_3_2_7_1
– ident: e_1_3_2_12_1
  doi: 10.1037/spq0000305
– ident: e_1_3_2_2_1
  doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00284-0
SSID ssj0003342
Score 2.4323668
Snippet Meta-analyzing data from single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) usually requires data extraction, a process by which numerical values are obtained from...
SourceID crossref
informaworld
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 291
SubjectTerms Jorge E. Gonzalez
meta-analysis
research methods
single subject designs
Title The Relationship between Intercoder Reliability of Data Extraction and Effect Measure Calculation in Single-Case Meta-Analysis
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2372966X.2023.2273822
Volume 54
WOSCitedRecordID wos001088399800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2372-966X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003342
  issn: 2372-966X
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 19720101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELZQxdCFRwFRXvLA6pLYbh4jKq0YoEKiQLfI8UNEqtIqDYgu_Hbs2InaARhgTi6y7Mvd2f7u-wC45FQGoacU0tUqRlRxH6VxGiGhpJChzyitOryf78LxOJpO4weHJlw6WKXZQytLFFHFavNzs3RZI-KusLlqCoJpz0h_97BpLsEmCuvK3vj4ZPTSxGJCKK77dr6z3MhIG3yla5lmtPsPY9wDO67MhNfWL_bBlsw7RqHZoTk6oN1EvtUB-NTOAhtY3Gu2gA6-BasDQ9P2XpjnmSX1XsG5gjesZHD4URa2MwLqkUJLhQzv7bkjHLAZd-pgMMvho86SM4kGOm_qV0qGakKUQ_A0Gk4Gt8gJMyBOfFwiQkSfYsaZHwrCIi-iCiuT5yiRXPVFX0odSeJQEc5EgD2eYumnqYikEiJVHjkCrXyey2MAPW4uHhmjMec0YrqcZFJvsjATRH_Nk11A68VJuGMtN-IZs8R35Kb1TCdmphM3013Qa8wWlrbjN4N4feWTsjovUVbcJCE_2p78wfYUtLFRFDYQSnoGWmXxJs_BNn8vs2VxUTnzF1xa9Cw
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LTwIxEG4MmsjFB2rEZw9ei7tt2cfRIAQjcBGV26bbRyQhQNbVyMXfbmcfBA7qQc-7s2na2Zl2-s33IXQlufZ8xxhid6uUcCNdEodxQJTRSvuu4Dzr8H7q-YNBMBqFq70wAKuEM7TJiSKyWA0_NxSjS0jcNYW7Js8bNUD7u0Ghu4TaMLzZtLkWYH3DzvMyGjPGadm5853pWk5aYyxdyTWd3f8Y5R7aKXaa-CZ3jX20oac1EGkuAB01VF0Gv8UB-rT-gpfIuJfxHBcILpzVDKHzPYHn45zXe4FnBt-KVOD2R5rkzRHYDhXnbMi4n5cecUtMZCEQhsdT_GAT5USTlk2d9pVUkJIT5RA9dtrDVpcU2gxEMpemhDHV5FRI4fqKicAJuKEGUh1nWpqmamptg0noGyaF8qgjY6rdOFaBNkrFxmFHqDKdTfUxwo6Eu0cheCglD4TdUQptz1lUKGa_5ug64uXqRLIgLgf9jEnkFvym5UxHMNNRMdN11FiazXPmjt8MwtWlj9KsZGJyfZOI_Wh78gfbS7TdHfZ7Ue9ucH-KqhQEhgFRyc9QJU3e9Dnaku_p-DW5yDz7C7lo-E0
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NT8IwFG8MGsPFD9SInz14LW5tYdvRAItGJCSiclu6fsQlBAhMIxf_dtutW-CgHvS8vaVp3957bX_v9wPgilPZ8hylkK5WMaKKuygOYh8JJYX0XEZp1uH93PP6fX80CgYWTbiwsEqzh1Y5UUQWq83PPROqQMRdY3PV1GqNGkb6u4FNcwnWUXgzI8fSLj0MX8pgTAjFRePOd6ZrKWmNsHQl1YS7_zDIPbBj60x4kzvGPtiQk5qRaLZwjhqolqFveQA-tbfAEhf3msygxW_B7MTQ9L3PzfMkZ_VewqmCHZYy2P1I53lrBNQjhTkXMnzIDx5hm425lQeDyQQ-6jQ5lqitE6d-JWWoYEQ5BE9hd9i-RVaZAXHi4hQRIpoUM85cTxDmOz5VWJlER4nkqimaUupQEniKcCZa2OExlm4cC18qIWLlkCNQmUwn8hhAh5ubR8ZowDn1ma4nmdS7LMwE0V9zZB3QYnEibmnLjXrGOHItu2kx05GZ6cjOdB00SrNZztvxm0GwuvJRmh2YqFzdJCI_2p78wfYSbA86YdS769-fgio26sIGTknPQCWdv8lzsMXf02Qxv8j8-gupgvbx
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Relationship+between+Intercoder+Reliability+of+Data+Extraction+and+Effect+Measure+Calculation+in+Single-Case+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=School+psychology+review&rft.au=Drevon%2C+Daniel+D.&rft.au=Peart%2C+Allison+M.&rft.au=Koval%2C+Elizabeth+T.&rft.date=2025-05-04&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.eissn=2372-966X&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F2372966X.2023.2273822&rft.externalDocID=2273822
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2372-966X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2372-966X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2372-966X&client=summon