A Genetic Algorithm-Based Personalized Remedial Learning System for Learning Object-Oriented Concepts of Java
Contribution: An online genetic algorithm-based remedial learning system is presented in order to strengthen students' understanding of object-oriented programming (OOP) concepts by tailoring personalized learning materials according to each student's strengths and weaknesses. Background:...
Saved in:
| Published in: | IEEE transactions on education Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 237 - 245 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
IEEE
01.11.2019
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0018-9359, 1557-9638 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Contribution: An online genetic algorithm-based remedial learning system is presented in order to strengthen students' understanding of object-oriented programming (OOP) concepts by tailoring personalized learning materials according to each student's strengths and weaknesses. Background: Prior studies on computer programming education have analyzed methods of learning OOP, and shown that teaching this topic is a challenge. A simple and personalized learning system for generating remedial learning materials would therefore be valuable, but had yet to be designed. Intended Outcomes: Students' grasp of OOP concepts is expected to improve through study of the tailored remedial learning materials generated by the system. Application Design: Students who had previously studied OOP were recruited to test the learning system in a two-semester pre-experiment using a one-group pre-test-post-test design. The students first took a pre-test that determined their individual strengths and weaknesses in these concepts. They then read three sets of quiz-based remedial learning materials; each set was generated by the system according to the individual student's answers in the pre-test and previous quizzes. Findings: 1) Overall, the changes between learners' pre-and post-test scores were significant; 2) Score changes for different learners (junior, senior, low-achievement, and high-achievement learners) and for different learning styles (intensive and non-intensive) were also significant; and 3) Score changes for low-achievement learners were greater than those for high-achievement learners. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0018-9359 1557-9638 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TE.2018.2876663 |