Sleep assessment by means of a wrist actigraphy-based algorithm: agreement with polysomnography in an ambulatory study on older adults

The purpose of the present work is to examine, on a clinically diverse population of older adults (N = 46) sleeping at home, the performance of two actigraphy-based sleep tracking algorithms (i.e., Actigraphy-based Sleep algorithm, ACT-S1 and Sadeh's algorithm) compared to manually scored elect...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Chronobiology international Ročník 38; číslo 3; s. 400 - 414
Hlavní autoři: Regalia, Giulia, Gerboni, Giulia, Migliorini, Matteo, Lai, Matteo, Pham, Jonathan, Puri, Nirajan, Pavlova, Milena K., Picard, Rosalind W., Sarkis, Rani A., Onorati, Francesco
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England 04.03.2021
Témata:
Actigraphy
Aged
Algorithms
Circadian Rhythm
Humans
Polysomnography
Reproducibility of Results
Sleep
Wrist
older adults
sleep detection
Actigraphy-based sleep tracking algorithms
wearables
polysomnography
sleep quality
ISSN:0742-0528, 1525-6073, 1525-6073
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The purpose of the present work is to examine, on a clinically diverse population of older adults (N = 46) sleeping at home, the performance of two actigraphy-based sleep tracking algorithms (i.e., Actigraphy-based Sleep algorithm, ACT-S1 and Sadeh's algorithm) compared to manually scored electroencephalography-based PSG (PSG-EEG). ACT-S1 allows for a fully automatic identification of sleep period time (SPT) and within the identified sleep period, the sleep-wake classification. SPT detected by ACT-S1 did not differ statistically from using PSG-EEG (bias = -9.98 min; correlation 0.89). In sleep-wake classification on 30-s epochs within the identified sleep period, the new ACT-S1 presented similar or slightly higher accuracy (83-87%), precision (86-89%) and F1 score (90-92%), significantly higher specificity (39-40%), and significantly lower, but still high, sensitivity (96-97%) compared to Sadeh's algorithm, which achieved 99% sensitivity as the only measure better than ACT-S1's. Total sleep times (TST) estimated with ACT-S1 and Sadeh's algorithm were higher, but still highly correlated to PSG-EEG's TST. Sleep quality metrics of sleep period efficiency and wake-after-sleep-onset computed by ACT-S1 were not significantly different from PSG-EEG, while the same sleep quality metrics derived by Sadeh's algorithm differed significantly from PSG-EEG. Agreement between ACT-S1 and PSG-EEG reached was highest when analyzing the subset of subjects with least disrupted sleep (N = 28). These results provide evidence of promising performance of a full-automation of the sleep tracking procedure with ACT-S1 on older adults. Future longitudinal validations across specific medical conditions are needed. The algorithm's performance may further improve with integrating multi-sensor information.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0742-0528
1525-6073
1525-6073
DOI:10.1080/07420528.2020.1835942