The Big-O Problem
Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not greater than some constant multiple of the weight in the second. We show that the problem is undecidable, even for the instantiation of weighted aut...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Logical methods in computer science Ročník 18, Issue 1 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V
01.01.2022
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1860-5974, 1860-5974 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O
of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not
greater than some constant multiple of the weight in the second.
We show that the problem is undecidable, even for the instantiation of
weighted automata as labelled Markov chains. Moreover, even when it is known
that one weighted automaton is big-O of another, the problem of finding or
approximating the associated constant is also undecidable.
Our positive results show that the big-O problem is polynomial-time solvable
for unambiguous automata, coNP-complete for unlabelled weighted automata (i.e.,
when the alphabet is a single character) and decidable, subject to Schanuel's
conjecture, when the language is bounded (i.e., a subset of $w_1^*\dots w_m^*$
for some finite words $w_1,\dots,w_m$) or when the automaton has finite
ambiguity.
On labelled Markov chains, the problem can be restated as a ratio total
variation distance, which, instead of finding the maximum difference between
the probabilities of any two events, finds the maximum ratio between the
probabilities of any two events. The problem is related to
$\varepsilon$-differential privacy, for which the optimal constant of the big-O
notation is exactly $\exp(\varepsilon)$. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not greater than some constant multiple of the weight in the second. We show that the problem is undecidable, even for the instantiation of weighted automata as labelled Markov chains. Moreover, even when it is known that one weighted automaton is big-O of another, the problem of finding or approximating the associated constant is also undecidable. Our positive results show that the big-O problem is polynomial-time solvable for unambiguous automata, coNP-complete for unlabelled weighted automata (i.e., when the alphabet is a single character) and decidable, subject to Schanuel's conjecture, when the language is bounded (i.e., a subset of $w_1^*\dots w_m^*$ for some finite words $w_1,\dots,w_m$) or when the automaton has finite ambiguity. On labelled Markov chains, the problem can be restated as a ratio total variation distance, which, instead of finding the maximum difference between the probabilities of any two events, finds the maximum ratio between the probabilities of any two events. The problem is related to $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, for which the optimal constant of the big-O notation is exactly $\exp(\varepsilon)$. Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not greater than some constant multiple of the weight in the second. We show that the problem is undecidable, even for the instantiation of weighted automata as labelled Markov chains. Moreover, even when it is known that one weighted automaton is big-O of another, the problem of finding or approximating the associated constant is also undecidable. Our positive results show that the big-O problem is polynomial-time solvable for unambiguous automata, coNP-complete for unlabelled weighted automata (i.e., when the alphabet is a single character) and decidable, subject to Schanuel's conjecture, when the language is bounded (i.e., a subset of $w_1^*\dots w_m^*$ for some finite words $w_1,\dots,w_m$) or when the automaton has finite ambiguity. On labelled Markov chains, the problem can be restated as a ratio total variation distance, which, instead of finding the maximum difference between the probabilities of any two events, finds the maximum ratio between the probabilities of any two events. The problem is related to $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, for which the optimal constant of the big-O notation is exactly $\exp(\varepsilon)$. |
| Author | Kiefer, Stefan Purser, David Murawski, Andrzej S. Chistikov, Dmitry |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dmitry surname: Chistikov fullname: Chistikov, Dmitry – sequence: 2 givenname: Stefan surname: Kiefer fullname: Kiefer, Stefan – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrzej S. surname: Murawski fullname: Murawski, Andrzej S. – sequence: 4 givenname: David surname: Purser fullname: Purser, David |
| BookMark | eNpNkLtOAzEURC0UJEJIQUuVEoqF68de23QQBYgUKRShtvwMG-1mkZ2GvycPhJhmRlOc4lySwbbfRkJuKNwLZFo9tJ0vFVW39FHAHQPGzsiQKoSq1lIM_u0LMi5lA_twThXDIblefcbJc7OulpP33Ls2dlfkPNm2xPFvj8jHy2w1fasWy9f59GlReQ5qVzmeggxScAoYXHCRhuBqrWvHoEZgHkCAtEJ7aqNG5E7KWHun0FKmdOAjMj9xQ2835is3nc3fpreNOR59Xhubd41vo0k1Qx105M5qgQKtlYlzwTF5jTGmPYudWD73peSY_ngUzNGROTgyVBlqBJiDI_4D7RhZwA |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
| DOI | 10.46298/lmcs-18(1:40)2022 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Computer Science |
| EISSN | 1860-5974 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f5269d9e3ba94646aa7f33436fc96eef 10_46298_lmcs_18_1_40_2022 |
| GroupedDBID | .4S .DC 29L 2WC 5GY 5VS AAFWJ AAYXX ADBBV ADMLS ADQAK AENEX AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARCSS BCNDV CITATION EBS EJD FRP GROUPED_DOAJ J9A KQ8 MK~ ML~ M~E OK1 OVT P2P TR2 TUS XSB |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b3fd7d743106dbdbe1ddb5995b205602c00407a49c1ae9663b77e5cb86a1289d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 5 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001127421400009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1860-5974 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:50:31 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:21:51 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c308t-b3fd7d743106dbdbe1ddb5995b205602c00407a49c1ae9663b77e5cb86a1289d3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/f5269d9e3ba94646aa7f33436fc96eef |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f5269d9e3ba94646aa7f33436fc96eef crossref_primary_10_46298_lmcs_18_1_40_2022 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-01-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2022 text: 2022-01-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Logical methods in computer science |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Logical Methods in Computer Science e.V |
| SSID | ssj0000331826 |
| Score | 2.285012 |
| Snippet | Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O
of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not
greater... Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not greater... |
| SourceID | doaj crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
| SubjectTerms | computer science - formal languages and automata theory computer science - logic in computer science |
| Title | The Big-O Problem |
| URI | https://doaj.org/article/f5269d9e3ba94646aa7f33436fc96eef |
| Volume | 18, Issue 1 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001127421400009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 1860-5974 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000331826 issn: 1860-5974 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1860-5974 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000331826 issn: 1860-5974 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwGLRQxcAC5SXKSxkYQMhqHLt-sAFqxULpAFI3y09UCQpqCyO_HX9xisrEwpLBiiL7TvZ3X5TcIXSmXKiIFxynWhkxs1XElkUwBAC9QHyS0KwOmxDDoRyP1Wgl6gu-Ccv2wBm4boQIbK8CtUYxzrgxIlLKKI9O8RAinL5J9aw0U_UZTCkI5_yXDOOVkt2XVzfHRJ6TK1ZepJa_-lWJVgz768oyaKPNRhIW13kq22gtTHfQ1jJuoWh23y5qJ0qLm8kzfihGOQZmDz0N-o-3d7hJNMCOlnKBLY1eeCjaJffW20C8t2D5ZaskRMrKwZ4ShilHTEiNCLVChJ6zkptUR5Sn-6g1fZuGA1QoYy0jCWoZPJNJ5xPuXc_1rCwjDYF00OVydfo9G1foJPhrLDRgoYnURLNSAxYddAMA_NwJptP1QKJCN1Tov6g4_I-HHKENmFB-y3GMWovZRzhB6-5zMZnPTmuW0_X-q_8NVzCq6w |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Big-O+Problem&rft.jtitle=Logical+methods+in+computer+science&rft.au=Chistikov%2C+Dmitry&rft.au=Kiefer%2C+Stefan&rft.au=Murawski%2C+Andrzej+S.&rft.au=Purser%2C+David&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.issn=1860-5974&rft.eissn=1860-5974&rft.volume=18%2C+Issue+1&rft_id=info:doi/10.46298%2Flmcs-18%281%3A40%292022&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_46298_lmcs_18_1_40_2022 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1860-5974&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1860-5974&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1860-5974&client=summon |