Bridging the Gap between Clients and Public Defenders: Introducing a Structured Shadow Method to Examine Attorney Communication

A growing body of scholarship argues that representing clients in an effective and quality manner should be a critical goal for public defenders, emphasizing the need to be client-centered. Beyond this call, recent research emphasizes that client-centered approaches hinge on good communication as it...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	The Justice system journal Ročník 43; číslo 1; s. 26 - 52
Hlavní autori:	Campbell, Christopher M., Henderson, Kelsey S.
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Williamsburg Routledge 25.07.2022 National Center for State Courts
Predmet:	attorney-client communication attorney-client relationship Attorneys Client relationships Clients Communication Criminal justice Operational definitions Patient-centered care Polls & surveys Public defenders public defense
ISSN:	0098-261X, 2327-7556
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Abstract	A growing body of scholarship argues that representing clients in an effective and quality manner should be a critical goal for public defenders, emphasizing the need to be client-centered. Beyond this call, recent research emphasizes that client-centered approaches hinge on good communication as it can contribute to a more effective attorney-client relationship. However, to identify and improve communication and client-centered relationships, major obstacles must be overcome which involve conceptualizing and operationalizing quality representation and communication. In this article, we introduce a two-phase, structured shadowing method as a way to overcome these obstacles. Phase I consists of a survey of public defenders that captures attorneys' perspectives of factors important in developing and maintaining good communication with clients. The second phase involves an exploratory method of shadowing attorneys in meetings with their clients, and administering a survey of clients to assess the importance of these factors from their vantagepoint and their overall perception of communication with their attorney. Additionally, we demonstrate how this method can be deployed to aid in understanding and improving attorney-client communication from both the attorneys' and clients' perspectives. We conclude the article with a discussion of how this method can help to progress research and practice related to quality representation, and as appendices we provide the tools used to demonstrate the approach.
AbstractList	A growing body of scholarship argues that representing clients in an effective and quality manner should be a critical goal for public defenders, emphasizing the need to be client-centered. Beyond this call, recent research emphasizes that client-centered approaches hinge on good communication as it can contribute to a more effective attorney–client relationship. However, to identify and improve communication and client-centered relationships, major obstacles must be overcome which involve conceptualizing and operationalizing quality representation and communication. In this article, we introduce a two-phase, structured shadowing method as a way to overcome these obstacles. Phase I consists of a survey of public defenders that captures attorneys’ perspectives of factors important in developing and maintaining good communication with clients. The second phase involves an exploratory method of shadowing attorneys in meetings with their clients, and administering a survey of clients to assess the importance of these factors from their vantagepoint and their overall perception of communication with their attorney. Additionally, we demonstrate how this method can be deployed to aid in understanding and improving attorney–client communication from both the attorneys’ and clients’ perspectives. We conclude the article with a discussion of how this method can help to progress research and practice related to quality representation, and as appendices we provide the tools used to demonstrate the approach.
Author	Henderson, Kelsey S. Campbell, Christopher M.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Christopher M. surname: Campbell fullname: Campbell, Christopher M. organization: Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Portland State University – sequence: 2 givenname: Kelsey S. surname: Henderson fullname: Henderson, Kelsey S. organization: Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Portland State University
BookMark	eNp9kE9v1DAQxS1UJLaFj1DJEucUx3FihxNlaUulolYqSNws_xl3vUrsxXa03RNfnURbOHKZObz3ZvR-p-gkxAAIndfkoiaCfCCkF7Srf15QQut51DXr2Su0og3lFW_b7gStFk-1mN6g05y3hJCWcbZCvz8nb598eMJlA_hG7bCGsgcIeD14CCVjFSx-mPTgDf4CDoKFlD_i21BStJNZkgo_ljSZMiWw-HGjbNzjb1A20eIS8dWzGn0AfFlKTAEOeB3HcQreqOJjeIteOzVkePeyz9CP66vv66_V3f3N7fryrjINEaXiTjnGoemgbeeSrG910zhdGyU0M9oprpU1YDpOaic63RAumNCUadIqELo5Q--Pd3cp_pogF7mNUwrzS0m7ngrOGO1mV3t0mRRzTuDkLvlRpYOsiVxYy7-s5cJavrCec-fH3DbPJf-FKKeU8b6d9U9H3QcX06j2MQ1WFnUYYnJJBeOzbP7_4g--T5M9
Cites_doi	10.1002/bsl.2182 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31820c722d 10.2307/796611 10.2307/798932 10.1002/job.395 10.1002/bsl.584 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 10.1177/0887403419861672 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951646 10.1007/s10459-004-1790-2 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00136-7 10.2307/800044 10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826 10.1080/09614520903220792 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195078206.001.0001 10.1080/10417948009372467 10.1037/law0000095 10.1002/bsl.469
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2021 National Center for State Courts 2021 2022 National Center for State Courts 2021 National Center for State Courts
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2021 National Center for State Courts 2021 – notice: 2022 National Center for State Courts – notice: 2021 National Center for State Courts
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 4T- K7.
DOI	10.1080/0098261X.2021.2011494
DatabaseName	CrossRef Docstoc ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) Docstoc
DatabaseTitleList	ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Law
EISSN	2327-7556
EndPage	52
ExternalDocumentID	10_1080_0098261X_2021_2011494 27224795 2011494
Genre	Research Article
GroupedDBID	.CB .M. 2-G 29L 4.4 5GY 6DY 85S 8R4 8R5 96U AAKQS AAVDF AAZMC ABBHK ABCCY ABFIM ABJNI ABPEM ABTAI ABXSQ ABXYU ACDEK ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACTIO ACTOA ADAJC ADCVX ADFRT AECIN AEMXT AEOZU AEUPB AEYOC AEZRU AFAZI AGDLA AIJEM ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQTUD ASUFR AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BENPR BLEHA BOHLJ CCCUG DGFLZ DKSSO E3Z EBS E~B E~C F8P GTTXZ H13 HLR HOCAJ HZ~ IPNFZ IPSME JENOY JPL JST KYCEM LJTGL M2O M4Z NB9 O9- P2P Q2X RHO RIG RWL RXW S-F SA0 STATR TAA TAE TDBHL TFL TFW TNTFI TRJHH TWJ U5U ULE UNMZH UT5 W2G WEY X6Y AAYXX CITATION XRW 4T- K7.
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-7faf47e36e55021495b33fb1ca8b4cbfa7badcec6701f86b307848b24b05ae8b3
IEDL.DBID	TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount	4
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000728527600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0098-261X
IngestDate	Thu Nov 20 00:59:35 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:20:24 EST 2025 Thu May 29 09:07:25 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:48:20 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	1
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c308t-7faf47e36e55021495b33fb1ca8b4cbfa7badcec6701f86b307848b24b05ae8b3
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14
PQID	2692874426
PQPubID	47469
PageCount	27
ParticipantIDs	jstor_primary_27224795 proquest_journals_2692874426 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_0098261X_2021_2011494 crossref_primary_10_1080_0098261X_2021_2011494
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2022-07-25
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2022-07-25
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 07 year: 2022 text: 2022-07-25 day: 25
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Williamsburg
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Williamsburg
PublicationTitle	The Justice system journal
PublicationYear	2022
Publisher	Routledge National Center for State Courts
Publisher_xml	– name: Routledge – name: National Center for State Courts
References	Boccaccini M. T. (CIT0007) 2001; 25 Drinan C. H. (CIT0014) 2010; 47 CIT0030 Kohnke W. R. (CIT0024) 2001; 15 CIT0032 Cunningham C. D. (CIT0012) 1995; 2 CIT0034 Smith L.F. (CIT0042) 2018; 24 Moore J. (CIT0029) 2016; 14 Sandys M. (CIT0038) 2017; 14 CIT0036 CIT0035 CIT0037 CIT0039 Cunningham C. D. (CIT0011) 1998; 67 CIT0040 CIT0043 Davis K. (CIT0013) 1976 Stewart M. (CIT0045) 2000; 49 Steinberg R. (CIT0044) 2013; 70 Barton K. (CIT0004) 2006; 13 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0002 CIT0046 CIT0005 CIT0049 CIT0048 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 CIT0050 Gonzalez Van Cleve N. (CIT0019) 2017 Neustadter G. (CIT0033) 1986; 35 CIT0018 CIT0017 Clair M. (CIT0010) 2020 Gellhorn G. (CIT0015) 1994; 1 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0022 Moore J. (CIT0031) 2018; 69 Institute of Medicine (US). (CIT0023) 2001 Gerber R. J. (CIT0016) 1989 CIT0025 Sklansky D. A. (CIT0041) 2011 CIT0027 CIT0026 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (CIT0001) 2005 CIT0028
References_xml	– ident: CIT0040 – volume: 25 start-page: 81 year: 2001 ident: CIT0007 publication-title: Law and Psychology Review – volume-title: The Persistent Pull of Police Professionalism year: 2011 ident: CIT0041 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1002/bsl.2182 – volume-title: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century - Institute of Medicine year: 2001 ident: CIT0023 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31820c722d – year: 2005 ident: CIT0001 publication-title: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.2307/796611 – volume-title: Lawyers, Courts, and Professionalism: The Agenda for Reform year: 1989 ident: CIT0016 – ident: CIT0046 doi: 10.2307/798932 – volume: 24 start-page: 487 year: 2018 ident: CIT0042 publication-title: Clinical Law Review – volume: 13 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: CIT0004 publication-title: Clinical Law Review – volume: 2 start-page: 285 issue: 1 year: 1995 ident: CIT0012 publication-title: Clinical Law Review – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1002/job.395 – ident: CIT0025 – volume: 35 start-page: 177 issue: 1 year: 1986 ident: CIT0033 publication-title: Buffalo Law Review – ident: CIT0002 – volume: 49 start-page: 796 issue: 9 year: 2000 ident: CIT0045 publication-title: The Journal of Family Practice – ident: CIT0035 – volume: 14 start-page: 345 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: CIT0029 publication-title: Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1002/bsl.584 – volume: 70 start-page: 961 year: 2013 ident: CIT0044 publication-title: Washington and Lee Law Review – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1177/0887403419861672 – ident: CIT0005 – ident: CIT0036 – volume-title: Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry year: 1976 ident: CIT0013 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951646 – ident: CIT0017 – volume: 1 start-page: 245 issue: 2 year: 1994 ident: CIT0015 publication-title: Clinical Law Review – volume-title: Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America’s Largest Criminal Court year: 2017 ident: CIT0019 – volume: 67 start-page: 1959 issue: 5 year: 1998 ident: CIT0011 publication-title: Fordham Law Review – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-1790-2 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00136-7 – volume-title: Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court year: 2020 ident: CIT0010 – volume: 15 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: CIT0024 publication-title: American Jails – volume: 47 start-page: 487 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: CIT0014 publication-title: Harvard Journal on Legislation – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.2307/800044 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826 – ident: CIT0048 doi: 10.1080/09614520903220792 – ident: CIT0049 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195078206.001.0001 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1080/10417948009372467 – volume: 14 start-page: 431 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: CIT0038 publication-title: Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law – ident: CIT0020 – ident: CIT0050 doi: 10.1037/law0000095 – volume: 69 start-page: 769 year: 2018 ident: CIT0031 publication-title: Mercer Law Review – ident: CIT0003 – ident: CIT0028 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1002/bsl.469 – ident: CIT0034
SSID	ssj0005474
Score	2.2610388
Snippet	A growing body of scholarship argues that representing clients in an effective and quality manner should be a critical goal for public defenders, emphasizing...
SourceID	proquest crossref jstor informaworld
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher
StartPage	26
SubjectTerms	attorney-client communication attorney-client relationship Attorneys Client relationships Clients Communication Criminal justice Operational definitions Patient-centered care Polls & surveys Public defenders public defense
Title	Bridging the Gap between Clients and Public Defenders: Introducing a Structured Shadow Method to Examine Attorney Communication
URI	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0098261X.2021.2011494 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27224795 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2692874426
Volume	43
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000728527600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete customDbUrl: eissn: 2327-7556 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0005474 issn: 0098-261X databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 19880101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JTsMwELWg4sCFvaJsmgPXQBI7ccyNpQUkqJAA0VtkO7ZAgrZqAoUTv47tJIUKIQ7wAbZjz3gW580bhHbjUNAsZtijnDKPqMj3jJ9nnhQ80IybgCSSrtkE7XaTXo9dVWjCvIJV2hxal0QRzlbby81FXiPi9i0Hpgn8eya7CwPHwkmYZQQ1kb3V8ZvO3SfIg1Q8zMzogxlS1_D8NMuUd5riLq3xit9stnNEncV_2MISWqiiUDgs1WYZzaj-Cpq94ONV9H5kS7iMQwMTGsIpH0IF5YLjR1s7mYNZFMrXPjhR2rWiyw_g3ELes2dpR3K4drS0zyOVwfU9zwZjuHStqqEYQPuVP5kvhsPCbLSv3mCqSGUN3XbaN8dnXtWlwZPYTwqPaq4JVThWJtkJbcIlMNYikDwRRArNqeCZVDKmfqCTWBijkpBEhET4EVeJwE3U6A_6ah0Bi7T9TYiFCDLCI5_HCdHKToQDRbFsob1aOumwJONIgwnHaXmiqT3RtDrRFmJfZZgW7hVEly1LUvzL2KYT-GSlkJpwh7KohbZqDUirC5-nYcxcJ4Ew3vjDmptoPrTlFb5lz9hCDSMrtY3m5EvxkI92nGp_AFZE9dc
linkProvider	Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwEB7xkuDSUh5iKdA59JqSxE4c90aBBdRlL2zVvVm2Ywsk2EVsePTUv17bSYAVqjjAD7Ade8bzcL75BuBrnipW5pxETDIeUZPFkfPzPNJKJpZLF5BkOjSbYP1-MRzy57UwHlbpc2hbE0UEW-0vt3-MbiFxu54E00X-Q5fepUmg4aSczsJ85nyth_UNur-fYB60YWLmTiPcmLaK53_TTPmnKfbSFrH4wmoHV9T9-B6bWIYPTSCKe7XmfIIZM1qB2Z68X4W_P3wVl_Np6KJDPJLX2KC5cP_Sl09O0K2K9YMfHhgbutFNvuOJR72Xt9qPlHgWmGlvb0yJZ-eyHN_jaehWjdUYDx_klftk3KvcTkfmD07VqazBr-7hYP84aho1RJrERRUxKy1lhuTG5Tupz7kUIVYlWhaKamUlU7LURucsTmyRK2dXClqolKo4k6ZQZB3mRuOR2QDkmfV_ColSSUllFsu8oNb4iUhiGNEd-NaKR1zXfBwieaQ5rU9U-BMVzYl2gD8XoqjCQ4itu5YI8srY9SDxx5VS5iIexrMObLUqIJo7PxFpzkMzgTTffMOaX2DxeHDaE72T_s_PsJT6aovYk2lswZyTm9mGBX1XXUxudoKe_wPOe_n4
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwEB4VWqFeKE-xlNI5cA1NYieOuVFgW1RYIUHVvVm2Ywsk2F2RbLc98ddrOwntClU90B9gO_aM5-F88w3AXp4qVuacREwyHlGTxZHz8zzSSiaWSxeQZDo0m2CDQTEc8osWTVi1sEqfQ9uGKCLYan-5J6XtEHEfPAemC_yHLrtLk8DCSTldgJeBHMup9FX_22-UB22JmLlTCDemK-L52zRz7mmOvLQDLD4x2sET9d_8hz2swHIbhuJhozer8MKM1mDhTM7W4eGjr-FyHg1dbIif5ARbLBce3friyQrdotg89-GxsaEXXXWApx7zXk61HynxMvDSTu9NiZfXshzP8Dz0qsZ6jCc_5J37Yjys3UZH5ifOValswNf-ydXR56ht0xBpEhd1xKy0lBmSG5ftpD7jUoRYlWhZKKqVlUzJUhudszixRa6cVSlooVKq4kyaQpFNWByNR2YLkGfW_yckSiUllVks84Ja4yciiWFE92C_k46YNGwcInkkOW1OVPgTFe2J9oD_KUNRh2cQ2_QsEeQfYzeDwB9XSpmLdxjPerDTaYBob3wl0pyHVgJpvv2MNd_D0sVxX5ydDr68hdepL7WIPZPGDiw6sZl38Ep_r2-q-92g5b8At2r4nA
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging+the+Gap+between+Clients+and+Public+Defenders&rft.jtitle=The+Justice+system+journal&rft.au=Campbell%2C+Christopher+M.&rft.au=Henderson%2C+Kelsey+S.&rft.date=2022-07-25&rft.pub=National+Center+for+State+Courts&rft.issn=0098-261X&rft.eissn=2327-7556&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=52&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F0098261X.2021.2011494&rft.externalDocID=27224795
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0098-261X&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0098-261X&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0098-261X&client=summon