The Validity, Reliability and Usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) Instruments for Classification of Peristomal Skin Disorders: A Systematic Review
The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) instruments. Systematic literature review. We searched the following electronic databases: Pu...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing Ročník 52; číslo 4; s. 303 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
01.07.2025
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1528-3976, 1528-3976 |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) instruments.
Systematic literature review.
We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Embase, and CENTRAL. The search was limited to studies published after 2005 and written in the English or Dutch languages. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 years or older) with any type of abdominal ostomy created for any medical indication. Elements were selected for inclusion when they examined or described at least one psychometric aspect regarding validity, reliability, or usability of the OST or SACS.
The search retrieved 3077 records after removing duplicate elements. This systematic review is based on findings from four studies identifying two different psychometric properties. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist and the COSMIN Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The modified GRADE-approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes reported in this systematic review. According to the COSMIN criteria, the overall assessment for reliability and content validity was variable or indeterminate. This results in a low quality of evidence regarding the assessment instruments SACS and OST. Based on these findings, we conclude that neither the SACS nor OST have been sufficiently evaluated to fully determine their validity, reliability and usability in the clinical setting.
More research of peristomal skin assessment instruments SACS and OST is needed for further refining and validation before they can be introduced as a "gold standard" in practice among nurses, experts, and clinicians. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) instruments.
Systematic literature review.
We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Embase, and CENTRAL. The search was limited to studies published after 2005 and written in the English or Dutch languages. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 years or older) with any type of abdominal ostomy created for any medical indication. Elements were selected for inclusion when they examined or described at least one psychometric aspect regarding validity, reliability, or usability of the OST or SACS.
The search retrieved 3077 records after removing duplicate elements. This systematic review is based on findings from four studies identifying two different psychometric properties. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist and the COSMIN Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The modified GRADE-approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes reported in this systematic review. According to the COSMIN criteria, the overall assessment for reliability and content validity was variable or indeterminate. This results in a low quality of evidence regarding the assessment instruments SACS and OST. Based on these findings, we conclude that neither the SACS nor OST have been sufficiently evaluated to fully determine their validity, reliability and usability in the clinical setting.
More research of peristomal skin assessment instruments SACS and OST is needed for further refining and validation before they can be introduced as a "gold standard" in practice among nurses, experts, and clinicians. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) instruments.PURPOSEThe aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) instruments.Systematic literature review.METHODSystematic literature review.We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Embase, and CENTRAL. The search was limited to studies published after 2005 and written in the English or Dutch languages. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 years or older) with any type of abdominal ostomy created for any medical indication. Elements were selected for inclusion when they examined or described at least one psychometric aspect regarding validity, reliability, or usability of the OST or SACS.SEARCH STRATEGYWe searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Embase, and CENTRAL. The search was limited to studies published after 2005 and written in the English or Dutch languages. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 years or older) with any type of abdominal ostomy created for any medical indication. Elements were selected for inclusion when they examined or described at least one psychometric aspect regarding validity, reliability, or usability of the OST or SACS.The search retrieved 3077 records after removing duplicate elements. This systematic review is based on findings from four studies identifying two different psychometric properties. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist and the COSMIN Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The modified GRADE-approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes reported in this systematic review. According to the COSMIN criteria, the overall assessment for reliability and content validity was variable or indeterminate. This results in a low quality of evidence regarding the assessment instruments SACS and OST. Based on these findings, we conclude that neither the SACS nor OST have been sufficiently evaluated to fully determine their validity, reliability and usability in the clinical setting.FINDINGS CONCLUSIONSThe search retrieved 3077 records after removing duplicate elements. This systematic review is based on findings from four studies identifying two different psychometric properties. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist and the COSMIN Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The modified GRADE-approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes reported in this systematic review. According to the COSMIN criteria, the overall assessment for reliability and content validity was variable or indeterminate. This results in a low quality of evidence regarding the assessment instruments SACS and OST. Based on these findings, we conclude that neither the SACS nor OST have been sufficiently evaluated to fully determine their validity, reliability and usability in the clinical setting.More research of peristomal skin assessment instruments SACS and OST is needed for further refining and validation before they can be introduced as a "gold standard" in practice among nurses, experts, and clinicians.IMPLICATIONSMore research of peristomal skin assessment instruments SACS and OST is needed for further refining and validation before they can be introduced as a "gold standard" in practice among nurses, experts, and clinicians. |
| Author | Jacobs, Stijn Sergeant, Gregory Paque, Kristel Milisen, Koen Degol, Lien Depaifve, Yves Olaerts, Ine |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lien surname: Degol fullname: Degol, Lien organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 2 givenname: Ine surname: Olaerts fullname: Olaerts, Ine organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 3 givenname: Stijn surname: Jacobs fullname: Jacobs, Stijn organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 4 givenname: Gregory surname: Sergeant fullname: Sergeant, Gregory organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 5 givenname: Yves surname: Depaifve fullname: Depaifve, Yves organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 6 givenname: Kristel surname: Paque fullname: Paque, Kristel organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium – sequence: 7 givenname: Koen surname: Milisen fullname: Milisen, Koen organization: Koen Milisen, RN, PhD, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40717259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkMtO3DAUhq0KVIbLGyDk5SAxgx0ncdzdKKUUCTGIhHY5cuITYerE1HZA0-fjwWouI4035_b9_7G9j3YGOwBCx5TMKRH8_PfyZk62DqWCf0ETmiXFjAme72zle2jf-8cIiZSkX9FeSjjlSSYm6LV-APxLGq10WJ_hOzBaNtrEAstB4Xu_qWyHQ0SrMCpt8cIEcPKftoPG5RjkAG8j20cjPK0WZXX6Ll_62Fvj6o8ecG2twdNlVZ_iq8EHN_YwBI8763BppPe6060M0fFt1S047d_9PsTftbdOgfPf8AJXax-gj2wb7_us4eUQ7XbSeDj6jAeo_nFRlz9n18vLq3JxPWsZ4XwmSUuhaQCoSPJGsa6QjWyEKhgVWd4qkiiRMcZlwVTepAXneZfynKZKMZbkyQGaftg-Oft3BB9WvfYtGBOfb0e_YglLGUmzjEX05BMdmx7U6snpXrr1avPxyX_c9Inr |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2025 by the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2025 by the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1097/WON.0000000000001197 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Nursing |
| EISSN | 1528-3976 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40717259 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --K .Z2 0R~ 1B1 1~5 2KS 3T~ 4.4 4G. 4Q1 4Q2 53G 5GY 5VS 6PF 7-5 9V3 AAAAV AAEDT AAHPQ AAIQE AALRI AAMTA AAQQT AAQXK AARTV AASCR AAUEB AAWTL AAXUO ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABILE ABJNI ABNJN ABPXF ABVCZ ABWVN ABXVJ ABZAD ABZZY ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACEWU ACGFS ACHQT ACIFK ACILI ACJBD ACNWC ACRPL ACTHT ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADEGP ADFPA ADGGA ADGHP ADHPY ADMUD ADNKB ADNMO ADRCX ADTGS ADUKH AE3 AEETU AENEX AEQHQ AFBFQ AFDTB AFMBP AFMFG AFPHX AFSOK AFYGQ AGBRE AGQPQ AHQNM AHVBC AHWXW AINUH AJCLO AJEOO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ ALBXT ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC ASPBG ATPOU AVWKF AZFZN BQLVK BS7 C45 CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM DU5 DUNZO E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD EX3 FCALG FDB FEDTE FGOYB FL- GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HVGLF HYJ HZ~ IHE IKREB IN~ IPNFZ IYOWL J5H JF7 JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 L-C LK2 M41 MMDCI MPPUT NPM NQ- N~6 N~M O9- OAG OBZCC OCUKA ODA OFFRU OGKNY OHCKH OKBHI OLG OLL OMK ONSOO ONV OPUJH ORAPC OROCO ORVUJ OUGNH OUVQU OUVZD OVD OVDLW OVDNE OVOZU OWV OWX OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P QMB R2- R58 RIG RLZ ROL RPZ S4R S4S SEW SSZ TEORI TSPGW V2I W3M WG1 WOQ WOW X3V X3W ZZMQN 7X8 ACTAD ADKSD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3077-a0c1ebbee1926bd3f8abab9d831956cd02d95337a83d6b48776f47614dd33262 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001541918700012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1528-3976 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 22:15:24 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 08 01:52:04 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | Ostomy Enterostomy Ureterostomy Skin assessment tools Systematic review Skin Surgical stomas |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2025 by the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3077-a0c1ebbee1926bd3f8abab9d831956cd02d95337a83d6b48776f47614dd33262 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 40717259 |
| PQID | 3234304553 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3234304553 pubmed_primary_40717259 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025 Jul-Aug 01 20250701 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2025 text: 2025 Jul-Aug 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| SSID | ssj0009404 |
| Score | 2.3759854 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature to determine the validity, reliability, and usability of the Studio Alterazioni... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 303 |
| SubjectTerms | Humans Ostomy Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards Reproducibility of Results Skin Care - instrumentation Skin Care - methods Skin Diseases - classification Surgical Stomas - adverse effects |
| Title | The Validity, Reliability and Usability of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS) and Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) Instruments for Classification of Peristomal Skin Disorders: A Systematic Review |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40717259 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3234304553 |
| Volume | 52 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001541918700012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9tAEF7SuoVcmkfbNE8mkEMCXWxpldUql2BMTHKIbbDb-mb2JSjEVlI1Bff35Yd1ZiXFp0IgOgjEspLQjma_nZn9PsZOhBO5sTLn2kWaJyaKeaZswiMjEY4k2NjJg9hEOhio6TQb1QG3si6rbHxicNSusBQjb4tYJJTVOxeX9w-cVKMou1pLaLxhLYFQhqw6na7YwrMkyAfiFKU4zbvN1rksbf8YDirqwvqgbNr_QWaYbPobr33NTfahhpnQrexii635xTZ7X4cGPrIntA74jhDcIQj_ClSXXPF1L0EvHHwrm6siB0SIEKoNC-hSal3_pRAu9B4RVnpqKuZ4Izgdd3vjs9B9iIByvgTS9YJJUdzB6XA8OYObQFYbttQBQmUIepxUqRSMgx41CrzRdL-qc0MNWl5AF8bPnNNQJTQ-sUn_atK75rWeA7foSVKuOzbyxniPqFIaNBKljTaZU4I2LVrXiR0Vu6ZaCScNrqRSmScp4gfnBKLM-DN7uygW_gsDKbMkFc6qzMvEe2Vyd66lUtZbodEr7bLjZnRm-LtQDgQ_SfFYzlbjs8t2qiGe3Ve8HrOwtsXl4N4Leu-z9ZiUgEPh7gFr5egs_CF7Z__8_ln-Ogp2iOfB6PYftDXpTQ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Validity%2C+Reliability+and+Usability+of+the+Studio+Alterazioni+Cutanee+Stomali+%28SACS%29+and+Ostomy+Skin+Tool+%28OST%29+Instruments+for+Classification+of+Peristomal+Skin+Disorders%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+wound%2C+ostomy%2C+and+continence+nursing&rft.au=Degol%2C+Lien&rft.au=Olaerts%2C+Ine&rft.au=Jacobs%2C+Stijn&rft.au=Sergeant%2C+Gregory&rft.date=2025-07-01&rft.eissn=1528-3976&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=303&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FWON.0000000000001197&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40717259&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40717259&rft.externalDocID=40717259 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1528-3976&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1528-3976&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1528-3976&client=summon |