Cracking a hierarchical chaotic image encryption algorithm based on permutation
In year 2000, an efficient hierarchical chaotic image encryption (HCIE) algorithm was proposed, which divides a plain-image of size M×N with T possible value levels into K blocks of the same size and then operates position permutation on two levels: intra-block and inter-block. As a typical position...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Signal processing Vol. 118; pp. 203 - 210 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V
01.01.2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0165-1684, 1872-7557 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In year 2000, an efficient hierarchical chaotic image encryption (HCIE) algorithm was proposed, which divides a plain-image of size M×N with T possible value levels into K blocks of the same size and then operates position permutation on two levels: intra-block and inter-block. As a typical position permutation-only encryption algorithm, it has received intensive attention. The present paper analyzes specific security performance of HCIE against ciphertext-only attack and known/chosen-plaintext attack. It is found that onlyO(⌈logT(M·N/K)⌉)known/chosen plain-images are sufficient to achieve a good performance, and the computational complexity isO(M·N·⌈logT(M·N/K)⌉), which effectively demonstrates that hierarchical permutation-only image encryption algorithms are less secure than normal (i.e., non-hierarchical) ones. Detailed experiment results are given to verify the feasibility of the known-plaintext attack. In addition, it is pointed out that the security of HCIE against ciphertext-only attack was much overestimated.
•Security performance of an encryption algorithm called HCIE is analyzed in detail.•Hierarchical permutation-only encryption schemes are less secure than normal ones.•Security of HCIE against ciphertext-only attack was reported being overestimated. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0165-1684 1872-7557 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.008 |