Pediatric advanced appendicitis: open versus laparoscopic approach

Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach. Retrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques Ročník 19; číslo 2; s. 110
Hlavní autori: Nwokoma, Ngozi Joy, Swindells, Mark G, Pahl, Karoline, Mathur, Azad B, Minocha, Ashish, Kulkarni, Milind, Tsang, Thomas
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.04.2009
Predmet:
ISSN:1534-4908, 1534-4908
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach. Retrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay, operating time, wound complications, need for further surgery, and hospital readmission. Forty children were included, 17 were treated with open approach and 23 with laparoscopic approach. There was no conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. Overall complication rate, length of hospital stay, and need for further surgery were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group. Wound complications occurred more in the open group. Readmission for gastrointestinal obstruction was noted in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic approach is safe for advanced appendicitis in children. The outcomes are comparable in both study groups.
AbstractList Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach.PURPOSEOptimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach.Retrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay, operating time, wound complications, need for further surgery, and hospital readmission.METHODSRetrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay, operating time, wound complications, need for further surgery, and hospital readmission.Forty children were included, 17 were treated with open approach and 23 with laparoscopic approach. There was no conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. Overall complication rate, length of hospital stay, and need for further surgery were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group. Wound complications occurred more in the open group. Readmission for gastrointestinal obstruction was noted in the laparoscopic group.RESULTSForty children were included, 17 were treated with open approach and 23 with laparoscopic approach. There was no conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. Overall complication rate, length of hospital stay, and need for further surgery were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group. Wound complications occurred more in the open group. Readmission for gastrointestinal obstruction was noted in the laparoscopic group.Laparoscopic approach is safe for advanced appendicitis in children. The outcomes are comparable in both study groups.CONCLUSIONSLaparoscopic approach is safe for advanced appendicitis in children. The outcomes are comparable in both study groups.
Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach. Retrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay, operating time, wound complications, need for further surgery, and hospital readmission. Forty children were included, 17 were treated with open approach and 23 with laparoscopic approach. There was no conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. Overall complication rate, length of hospital stay, and need for further surgery were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group. Wound complications occurred more in the open group. Readmission for gastrointestinal obstruction was noted in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic approach is safe for advanced appendicitis in children. The outcomes are comparable in both study groups.
Author Mathur, Azad B
Minocha, Ashish
Kulkarni, Milind
Swindells, Mark G
Pahl, Karoline
Tsang, Thomas
Nwokoma, Ngozi Joy
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ngozi Joy
  surname: Nwokoma
  fullname: Nwokoma, Ngozi Joy
  email: ngnwokoma@hotmail.com
  organization: Paediatric Surgical Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. ngnwokoma@hotmail.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mark G
  surname: Swindells
  fullname: Swindells, Mark G
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Karoline
  surname: Pahl
  fullname: Pahl, Karoline
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Azad B
  surname: Mathur
  fullname: Mathur, Azad B
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ashish
  surname: Minocha
  fullname: Minocha, Ashish
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Milind
  surname: Kulkarni
  fullname: Kulkarni, Milind
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Tsang
  fullname: Tsang, Thomas
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19390275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNj1tLxDAQhYOsuBf9ByJ986lrkmmbxjdd1gsUFNTnMk0nGOm2sWkX_PdWXEHOw5kDH2c4SzZru5YYOxd8LbhWVy_Fds0rLoBA5EIbAsQjthApJHGieT77d8_ZMoQPzuUkOGFzoUFzqdIFu32m2uHQOxNhvcfWUB2h99TWzrjBheuom0K0pz6MIWrQY98F0_kf3vu-Q_N-yo4tNoHODr5ib3fb181DXDzdP25uitgAz4ZYoFYGVGptbm0qbQop5JVBUVdoSSurE1UpDlmSJVVeW65EnhkwWhJJkVRyxS5_e6e3nyOFody5YKhpsKVuDKUC4BoykBN5cSDHakd16Xu3w_6r_JstvwEVHF3u
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1739418
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06709_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2011_11_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2021_07_005
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2012_0522
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2020_02_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2011_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000000874
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_012_1962_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_014_2572_7
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31819ce3aa
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1534-4908
ExternalDocumentID 19390275
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.Z2
0R~
123
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5VS
6PF
8L-
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AARTV
AASCR
AAWTL
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEETU
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
EX3
F2K
F2L
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
IPNFZ
J5H
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
NPM
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OCUKA
ODA
OL1
OLG
OLV
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
T8P
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
ZFV
ZZMQN
7X8
ACBKD
ADKSD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-1a97c375ff8ff52f53538bca1dbafe97f947b7036464b8df07186c3c92ee214b2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 14
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000265424100006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1534-4908
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:41:09 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:39 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c306t-1a97c375ff8ff52f53538bca1dbafe97f947b7036464b8df07186c3c92ee214b2
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 19390275
PQID 733093632
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_733093632
pubmed_primary_19390275
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
PublicationTitleAlternate Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
PublicationYear 2009
SSID ssj0020203
Score 1.8975906
Snippet Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach. Retrospective case...
Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach.PURPOSEOptimal...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 110
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Age Factors
Appendectomy - instrumentation
Appendectomy - methods
Appendicitis - surgery
Child
Child Welfare
Child, Preschool
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Postoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
United Kingdom
Young Adult
Title Pediatric advanced appendicitis: open versus laparoscopic approach
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19390275
https://www.proquest.com/docview/733093632
Volume 19
WOSCitedRecordID wos000265424100006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LSwMxEA5qPXjxga_6Igevod1NmocXUWnxUEvBB70tSTYBQbqrtf5-Z_ZRT-LBy0JgF8JkdmaSb_J9hFwK7qPXOmeQiz0TOhdM29hnmksJA2lddcP7ZawmEz2bmWnTm7No2irbmFgF6rzweEbeUxwxO8nT6_KdoWgUgquNgsY66XCoZNCp1WwFIqQIstV0qYIhvtXenDOq9zge_hwBJsYHbu3vNWaVa0Y7_5zlLtluikx6U3vFHlkL831yu1LloC3wT22JErivHomNrigqaVFs01gu6BskUSS6LEp8vyEePyDPo-HT3T1rFBSYh63AJ0usUZ6rQYw6xkEaBxzim_M2yZ2NwahohHJIwSWkcDqPUG9o6bk3aQhpIlx6SDbmxTwcEwrLaL1TOWyAorBS2tT2hY9gdpsoHlyX0NYiGXgowg52HorlIlvZpEuOaqtmZc2kkUH1aBA3Pfn741Oy1QI5_eSMdCL8neGcbPovsNDHRbXy8JxMH74Baym5Ww
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric+advanced+appendicitis%3A+open+versus+laparoscopic+approach&rft.jtitle=Surgical+laparoscopy%2C+endoscopy+%26+percutaneous+techniques&rft.au=Nwokoma%2C+Ngozi+Joy&rft.au=Swindells%2C+Mark+G&rft.au=Pahl%2C+Karoline&rft.au=Mathur%2C+Azad+B&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.issn=1534-4908&rft.eissn=1534-4908&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSLE.0b013e31819ce3aa&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1534-4908&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1534-4908&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1534-4908&client=summon