Calibrating variant curation by clinical context based on factors that influence patients' tolerance of uncertainty

Shared decision making manages genomic uncertainty by integrating molecular and clinical uncertainties with patient values to craft a person-centered management plan. Laboratories seek genomic report consistency, agnostic to clinical context. Molecular reports often mask laboratory-managed uncertain...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Genetics in medicine Ročník 25; číslo 12; s. 100982
Hlavní autoři: Trainer, Alison H, Goode, Erin, Hoskins, Cass N, Wheeler, Jack C W, Best, Stephanie
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.12.2023
Témata:
Clinical Decision-Making
Communication
Decision Making
Emotions
Humans
Uncertainty
Precision public health
Variant curation
Genomic uncertainty
Patient preference implementation
Person-centred care
ISSN:1530-0366, 1530-0366
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Shared decision making manages genomic uncertainty by integrating molecular and clinical uncertainties with patient values to craft a person-centered management plan. Laboratories seek genomic report consistency, agnostic to clinical context. Molecular reports often mask laboratory-managed uncertainties from clinical decision making. Better integration of these uncertainty management strategies requires a nuanced understanding of patients' perceptions and reactions to test uncertainties. We explored patients' tolerance to variant uncertainty in 3 parameters: (1) relative causal significance, (2) risk accuracy, and (3) classification validity. Deliberative forums were undertaken with 18 patients with predictive testing experience. Uncertainty deliberations were elicited for each parameter. A thematic framework was first developed, and then mapped to whether they justified tolerance to more or less parameter-specific uncertainty. Six identified themes mapped to clinical and personal domains. These domains generated opposing forces when calibrating uncertainty. Personal themes justified tolerance of higher uncertainty and clinical themes lower uncertainty. Decision making in uncertainty focused on reducing management regret. Open communication increased tolerance of classification validity and risk accuracy uncertainty. Using these data, we have developed a nascent clinical algorithm integrating molecular uncertainty with clinical context through a targeted communication framework. Maximizing test utility necessitates context-specific recalibration of uncertainty management and communication.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1530-0366
1530-0366
DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2023.100982