From funding agencies to scientific agency Collective allocation of science funding as an alternative to peer review

Graphical Abstract The traditional peer review system for grant proposals is not always optimal. A new crowdfunding proposal based on advances in technology and mathematics could improve efficiency while retaining peer judgement.

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	EMBO reports Ročník 15; číslo 2; s. 131 - 133
Hlavní autoři:	Bollen, Johan, Crandall, David, Junk, Damion, Ding, Ying, Börner, Katy
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.02.2014 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Témata:	Biomedical Research - economics EMBO55 Peer Review, Research Research Support as Topic - economics Research Support as Topic - methods Research Support as Topic - organization & administration Science & Society
ISSN:	1469-221X, 1469-3178, 1469-3178
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Popis
Shrnutí:	Graphical Abstract The traditional peer review system for grant proposals is not always optimal. A new crowdfunding proposal based on advances in technology and mathematics could improve efficiency while retaining peer judgement.
Bibliografie:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	1469-221X 1469-3178 1469-3178
DOI:	10.1002/embr.201338068