Détente: A Practical Understanding of P values and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically significant findings have been used to imply scientifically or clinically significant findings. Challenges to this approach have arisen over the pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Jg. 109; H. 6; S. 1489 - 1498
1. Verfasser: Ruberg, Stephen J.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 01.06.2021
ISSN:0009-9236, 1532-6535, 1532-6535
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically significant findings have been used to imply scientifically or clinically significant findings. Challenges to this approach have arisen over the past 6 decades, but they have largely been unheeded. There is a growing movement for using Bayesian statistical inference to quantify the probability that a scientific finding is credible. There have been differences of opinion between the frequentist (i.e., NHST) and Bayesian schools of inference, and warnings about the use or misuse of P values have come from both schools of thought spanning many decades. Controversies in this arena have been heightened by the American Statistical Association statement on P values and the further denouncement of the term “statistical significance” by others. My experience has been that many scientists, including many statisticians, do not have a sound conceptual grasp of the fundamental differences in these approaches, thereby creating even greater confusion and acrimony. If we let A represent the observed data, and B represent the hypothesis of interest, then the fundamental distinction between these two approaches can be described as the frequentist approach using the conditional probability pr(A | B) (i.e., the P value), and the Bayesian approach using pr(B | A) (the posterior probability). This paper will further explain the fundamental differences in NHST and Bayesian approaches and demonstrate how they can co‐exist harmoniously to guide clinical trial design and inference.
AbstractList Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically significant findings have been used to imply scientifically or clinically significant findings. Challenges to this approach have arisen over the past 6 decades, but they have largely been unheeded. There is a growing movement for using Bayesian statistical inference to quantify the probability that a scientific finding is credible. There have been differences of opinion between the frequentist (i.e., NHST) and Bayesian schools of inference, and warnings about the use or misuse of P values have come from both schools of thought spanning many decades. Controversies in this arena have been heightened by the American Statistical Association statement on P values and the further denouncement of the term "statistical significance" by others. My experience has been that many scientists, including many statisticians, do not have a sound conceptual grasp of the fundamental differences in these approaches, thereby creating even greater confusion and acrimony. If we let A represent the observed data, and B represent the hypothesis of interest, then the fundamental distinction between these two approaches can be described as the frequentist approach using the conditional probability pr(A | B) (i.e., the P value), and the Bayesian approach using pr(B | A) (the posterior probability). This paper will further explain the fundamental differences in NHST and Bayesian approaches and demonstrate how they can co-exist harmoniously to guide clinical trial design and inference.Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically significant findings have been used to imply scientifically or clinically significant findings. Challenges to this approach have arisen over the past 6 decades, but they have largely been unheeded. There is a growing movement for using Bayesian statistical inference to quantify the probability that a scientific finding is credible. There have been differences of opinion between the frequentist (i.e., NHST) and Bayesian schools of inference, and warnings about the use or misuse of P values have come from both schools of thought spanning many decades. Controversies in this arena have been heightened by the American Statistical Association statement on P values and the further denouncement of the term "statistical significance" by others. My experience has been that many scientists, including many statisticians, do not have a sound conceptual grasp of the fundamental differences in these approaches, thereby creating even greater confusion and acrimony. If we let A represent the observed data, and B represent the hypothesis of interest, then the fundamental distinction between these two approaches can be described as the frequentist approach using the conditional probability pr(A | B) (i.e., the P value), and the Bayesian approach using pr(B | A) (the posterior probability). This paper will further explain the fundamental differences in NHST and Bayesian approaches and demonstrate how they can co-exist harmoniously to guide clinical trial design and inference.
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically significant findings have been used to imply scientifically or clinically significant findings. Challenges to this approach have arisen over the past 6 decades, but they have largely been unheeded. There is a growing movement for using Bayesian statistical inference to quantify the probability that a scientific finding is credible. There have been differences of opinion between the frequentist (i.e., NHST) and Bayesian schools of inference, and warnings about the use or misuse of P values have come from both schools of thought spanning many decades. Controversies in this arena have been heightened by the American Statistical Association statement on P values and the further denouncement of the term “statistical significance” by others. My experience has been that many scientists, including many statisticians, do not have a sound conceptual grasp of the fundamental differences in these approaches, thereby creating even greater confusion and acrimony. If we let A represent the observed data, and B represent the hypothesis of interest, then the fundamental distinction between these two approaches can be described as the frequentist approach using the conditional probability pr(A | B) (i.e., the P value), and the Bayesian approach using pr(B | A) (the posterior probability). This paper will further explain the fundamental differences in NHST and Bayesian approaches and demonstrate how they can co‐exist harmoniously to guide clinical trial design and inference.
Author Ruberg, Stephen J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Stephen J.
  surname: Ruberg
  fullname: Ruberg, Stephen J.
  email: analytixthinking@gmail.com
  organization: Analytix Thinking, LLC
BookMark eNotkM1Kw0AUhQepYFsFH2GWblLnNz_uaq0_UDCLuB5ukjsykk5qZqr0kXwOX8yUujqcyzmHyzcjE997JOSaswVnTNw2u7gQjKkzMuVaiiTVUk_IlDFWJIWQ6QWZhfAxWlXk-ZRUD78_EX3EO7qk5QBNdA109M23OIQIvnX-nfaWlvQLuj0GOp7oPRwwOPC07EPEwfXDWO1rqF3nosNwSc4tdAGv_nVOqsd1tXpONq9PL6vlJmkkEyrhaBtteW610qkSKFrM2lQXIIsma-sc0HIExmVqrahzXkhVK8GAyyzNBcg5uTnN7ob-c_wtmq0LDXYdeOz3wQglmUzzTBdjNDlFv12HB7Mb3BaGg-HMHKGZEZo5QjOrsjqq_AOU-mM6
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2025_1520615
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13023_022_02342_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_PSY_0000000000001129
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2025_1459126
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1269650
crossref_primary_10_37349_edd_2025_100578
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_025_04166_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmal_2025_100256
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2024_109345
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41573_023_00638_0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
– notice: 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
DBID 24P
7X8
DOI 10.1002/cpt.2004
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1532-6535
EndPage 1498
ExternalDocumentID CPT2004
Genre article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-Q-
.55
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1CY
1OB
1OC
24P
29B
33P
354
36B
39C
3O-
4.4
52O
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
70F
8F7
AAESR
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQOH
AAQQT
AAWTL
AAYCA
AAYOK
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ACBNA
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADKYN
ADNMO
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFFPM
AHBTC
AI.
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZVAB
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BRXPI
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
DCZOG
DPXWK
DU5
EBS
EE.
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
GODZA
GWYGA
HGLYW
IH2
IHE
J5H
L7B
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LSO
LUTES
LYRES
M41
MEWTI
N4W
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OPC
OVD
P2P
P2W
PALCI
RIG
RIWAO
RJQFR
RNTTT
ROL
RPZ
SAMSI
SEW
SJN
SUPJJ
TEORI
TWZ
UHS
VH1
WBKPD
WH7
WOHZO
WXSBR
WYJ
X7M
Y6R
YCJ
YFH
YOC
YXB
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
7X8
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3024-1efc5f18f545642e2de7d659a39c7db8aef1ea0136ff2b81934b420a137682a3
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISSN 0009-9236
1532-6535
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 06:12:05 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:30:29 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3024-1efc5f18f545642e2de7d659a39c7db8aef1ea0136ff2b81934b420a137682a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fcpt.2004
PQID 2430368759
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2430368759
wiley_primary_10_1002_cpt_2004_CPT2004
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2021
  text: June 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
PublicationYear 2021
References 2017; 318
1966; 19
2019; 73
2011
1933; 231
2018; 564
2018; 169
2020; 17
2019; 567
1997
1926; 33
1994
2016; 72
2016; 70
1962; 33
2017; 112
1992; 11
2019; 381
2016; 164
2019; 321
2004; 33
2004; 96
1763; 53
2014; 506
1987; 82
2001; 6
1987; 257
2004; 14
2002; 21
2014; 36
1999; 130
2017; 140
1978; 48
2005; 2
2001; 55
1925
2014; 12
1989
2014; 32
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 231
  start-page: 289
  year: 1933
  end-page: 337
  article-title: On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
  publication-title: Philos. Trans. R Soc. A
– volume: 130
  start-page: 995
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1004
  article-title: Toward evidence‐based medical statistics. 1: the P value fallacy
  publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med.
– volume: 506
  start-page: 150
  year: 2014
  end-page: 152
  article-title: Scientific method: statistical errors
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 33
  start-page: 587
  year: 2004
  end-page: 606
  article-title: Mindless statistics
  publication-title: J. Socio. Econ.
– volume: 55
  start-page: 62
  year: 2001
  end-page: 71
  article-title: Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 164
  start-page: 279
  year: 2016
  end-page: 296
  article-title: Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
  publication-title: Ann. Int. Med.
– volume: 12
  year: 2014
  article-title: Distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory preclinical research will improve translation
  publication-title: PLoS Biol.
– volume: 321
  start-page: 2067
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2068
  article-title: The importance of predefined rules and prespecified statistical analyses: do not abandon significance
  publication-title: JAMA
– year: 1989
– volume: 112
  start-page: 885
  year: 2017
  end-page: 895
  article-title: Statistical significance and the dichotomization of evidence
  publication-title: J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 319
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 327
  article-title: Inference and decision making for 21st‐century drug development and approval
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 503
  year: 1926
  end-page: 513
  article-title: The arrangement of field experiments
  publication-title: J. Ministry Agric. Great Britain
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2437
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2444
  article-title: A comment on replication, p‐values and evidence, S.N.Goodman, Statistics in Medicine 1992;11:875‐879
  publication-title: Stat. Med.
– year: 1925
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 19
  article-title: Moving to a world beyond “p<0.05”
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 857
  year: 1966
  end-page: 882
  article-title: The role of hypothesis testing in clinical trials
  publication-title: J. Chron. Dis.
– volume: 169
  start-page: 577
  year: 2018
  end-page: 578
  article-title: Inappropriate statistical analysis and reporting in medical research: perverse incentives and institutional solutions
  publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 3
  article-title: Why are p‐values controversial?
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2
  article-title: Editorial
  publication-title: Basic Appl. Social Psych.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 875
  year: 1992
  end-page: 879
  article-title: A comment on replication, P‐values and evidence
  publication-title: Stat. Med.
– year: 1994
– volume: 17
  start-page: 8
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Different worlds: confirmatory versus exploratory research
  publication-title: Signif. (Oxf).
– volume: 318
  start-page: 1550
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1560
  article-title: Effect of therapeutic hypothermia initiated after 6 hours of age on death or disability among newborns with hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 53
  start-page: 370
  year: 1763
  end-page: 418
  article-title: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances
  publication-title: Philos. Trans. R Soc. London
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2
  article-title: Three inferential questions, two types of p‐value
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 378
  year: 1978
  end-page: 399
  article-title: The case against statistical significance testing
  publication-title: Harvard Educ. Rev.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 295
  year: 2004
  end-page: 327
  article-title: Alphabet soup: blurring the distinctions between p’s and α’s in psychological research
  publication-title: Theory Psych.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1
  year: 1962
  end-page: 67
  article-title: The future of data analysis
  publication-title: Ann. Math. Stat.
– volume: 2
  year: 2005
  article-title: Why most published research findings are false
  publication-title: PLoS Med.
– volume: 564
  start-page: 7
  year: 2018
  article-title: How sure are you of your result? Put a number on it
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 6
  start-page: 193
  year: 2001
  end-page: 204
  article-title: Two cheers for P‐value
  publication-title: J. Epidemiol. Biostat.
– volume: 72
  start-page: 90
  year: 2016
  end-page: 103
  article-title: Rejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
  publication-title: J. Math. Psych.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 106
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 114
  article-title: Valid p‐values behave exactly as they should: some misleading criticisms of p‐values and their resolution with s‐values
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– year: 1997
– volume: 82
  start-page: 112
  year: 1987
  end-page: 122
  article-title: Testing a point null hypothesis: the irreconcilability of p values and evidence
  publication-title: J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 186
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 191
  article-title: Three recommendations for improving the use of p‐values
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 82
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Before p < 0.05 to beyond p < 0.05: using history to contextualize p‐values and significance testing
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 73
  start-page: 69
  issue: suppl. 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 81
  article-title: Expert knowledge elicitation: subjective but scientific
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 567
  start-page: 305
  year: 2019
  end-page: 307
  article-title: Retire statistical significance
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 96
  start-page: 434
  year: 2004
  end-page: 442
  article-title: Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies
  publication-title: J. Nat. Cancer Inst.
– volume: 32
  start-page: 40
  year: 2014
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs
  publication-title: Nat. Biotech.
– volume: 140
  start-page: 685
  year: 2017
  end-page: 687
  article-title: Phase 2 to phase 3 clinical trial transitions: reasons for success and failure in immunologic diseases
  publication-title: J. Allergy Clin. Immun.
– volume: 70
  start-page: 129
  year: 2016
  end-page: 133
  article-title: The ASA's statement on p‐values: context, process, and purpose
  publication-title: Am. Stat.
– volume: 257
  start-page: 2459
  year: 1987
  end-page: 2463
  article-title: Are all significant p values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 381
  start-page: 286
  year: 2019
  article-title: New guidelines for statistical reporting in the journal
  publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med.
SSID ssj0004988
Score 2.4284468
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically...
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with its benchmark P value < 0.05 has long been a stalwart of scientific reporting and such statistically...
SourceID proquest
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 1489
Title Détente: A Practical Understanding of P values and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fcpt.2004
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2430368759
Volume 109
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV09T8MwELWgMLDwjShfMhLq1KiN48QOWylUTFWGIHWL7MSWWJKqaZH6k_gd_DHukoaUDYklkaJYis7PvnfO3TtCHlwZ-CozEmITrRwujHaAxylHWy8MjISoSKuq2YSYTuVsFkabrEqshan1IX4O3HBlVPs1LnCly0ErGprOq1RIvkv2XNcTiGjGo7YmMpSy6aIGJCZohGeHbNCM_EUqt6lp5VsmR__5qmNyuGGUdFRD4ITsmPyU9KJaknrdp3FbYVX2aY9GrVj1-ozEz1-fS9TlfKQjWosXwazRt-2aF1pYGlGUBTclhUf0Sa0NFl9SbPULEC4WMBQ2hirRFkLvcxJPXuLxq7PptOCkHjhpxzU29a0rLfIpzgzLjMgCP1RemIpMS2WsaxTKu1nLNJAIj2vOhgrsHsDMehekkxe5uSRUap1pq1IeQugI3EHq1Ag_46gDb0Vgu-S-sXkCQMa_Eyo3xapMGEdvCuFT2CW9ysTJvBbcSGppZZaAcbFtJk_GUYz3q7--eE0OGOaiVKcnN6SzXKzMLdlPP5bv5eKuAg5cxUx-A1TVyPg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NS8NAEB1qFfTit1g_V5CeGtpuNslGT7VaKtaSQ4Tewm6yC17a0rRCf5K_wz_mbNKYehM8BUIWltnZnfc2M28AbtvcdUSiOHITKSzmKWkhjhOW1LbvKo6sSIqs2YQ3HPLRyA8qcF_UwuT6ED8XbmZnZOe12eDmQrpZqobG0ywXkm3AJsOgZJgXZUFZFOlzXrRRQxTjFsqzLdosRv5ClevYNAsuvb1_TWsfdleYknRyJziAihofQj3IRamXDRKWNVZpg9RJUMpVL48gfPz6nBtlzjvSIbl8Ea4beVuveiETTQJihMFVSvAVeRBLZcoviWn2i048meFQPBqyVFsk38cQ9p7Cbt9a9VqwYhvDtNVWOnZ0m2uDqBhVNFFe4jq-sP3YSyQXSreVMAJvWlOJMMJmktGWQLu7uLb2CVTHk7E6BcKlTKQWMfORPCJ64DJWnpMwowSvPVfX4KYweoSubP5PiLGaLNKIMhNPkUD5NahnNo6mueRGlIsr0wiNaxpnsqgbhOZ59tcPr2G7H74OosHz8OUcdqjJTMnuUi6gOp8t1CVsxR_z93R2lXnRN4_Ly_Y
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3PS8MwFMcfc4p48bc4f0aQnVa2tmmb6mluDkUZPVTYrSRtAl7asW7C_iT_Dv8xX9rVzpvgqVAaCMlL8n3pe58HcGsy1-GJZOibCG5QTwoDdRw3hLJ9VzL0igQvik144zGbTPygAfdVLkzJh_i5cNMro9iv9QKX00R1a2poPC1iIekGbFIHfS2NdaZBnRTpM1aVUUMV41bk2Z7VrVr-UpXr2rQ4XEZ7_-rWPuyuNCXpl0ZwAA2ZHkI7KKHUyw4J6xyrvEPaJKhx1csjCIdfn3NN5rwjfVLii3DeyNt61gvJFAmIBoPLnOAr8sCXUqdfEl3sF404m2FT3BqKUFt0vo8hHD2GgydjVWvBiG08pg1TqthRJlNaUVFLWon0Etfxue3HXiIYl8qUXAPelLIEygibCmr1uIkbFM6tfQLNNEvlKRAmRCIUj6mPziOqByZi6TkJ1SR45bmqBTfVoEdoyvr_BE9ltsgji-rzFB0ovwXtYoyjaYnciEq4shXh4OrCmTQaBKF-nv31w2vYDoaj6PV5_HIOO5YOTCmuUi6gOZ8t5CVsxR_z93x2VRjRN2ely3E
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=D%C3%A9tente%3A+A+Practical+Understanding+of+P+values+and+Bayesian+Posterior+Probabilities&rft.jtitle=Clinical+pharmacology+and+therapeutics&rft.au=Ruberg%2C+Stephen+J.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.issn=0009-9236&rft.eissn=1532-6535&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1489&rft.epage=1498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fcpt.2004&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fcpt.2004&rft.externalDocID=CPT2004
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0009-9236&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0009-9236&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0009-9236&client=summon