MOEA/D with angle-based constrained dominance principle for constrained multi-objective optimization problems

This paper proposes a novel constraint-handling mechanism, namely the angle-based constrained dominance principle (ACDP), to solve constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). In this work, the mechanism of ACDP is embedded in a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorith...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied soft computing Vol. 74; pp. 621 - 633
Main Authors: Fan, Zhun, Fang, Yi, Li, Wenji, Cai, Xinye, Wei, Caimin, Goodman, Erik
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01.01.2019
Subjects:
ISSN:1568-4946, 1872-9681
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper proposes a novel constraint-handling mechanism, namely the angle-based constrained dominance principle (ACDP), to solve constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). In this work, the mechanism of ACDP is embedded in a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA/D). ACDP uses the angle information among solutions of a population and the proportion of feasible solutions to adjust the dominance relationship, so that it can maintain good convergence, diversity and feasibility of a population, simultaneously. To evaluate the performance of the proposed MOEA/D-ACDP, fourteen benchmark instances and an engineering optimization problem are studied. Six state-of-the-art CMOEAs, including C-MOEA/D, MOEA/D-CDP, MOEA/D-Epsilon, MOEA/D-SR, NSGA-II-CDP and SP, are compared. The experimental results illustrate that MOEA/D-ACDP is significantly better than the other six CMOEAs on these benchmark problems and the real-world case, which demonstrates the effectiveness of ACDP. •The proposed MOEA/D-ACDP utilizes the angle information to maintain the diversity.•MOEA/D-ACDP enhances convergence to the PF by exploring infeasible regions.•MOEA/D-ACDP is significantly better than the other six CMOEAs on the benchmark problems.
ISSN:1568-4946
1872-9681
DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.027