Detecting structural anomalies of quadcopter UAVs based on LSTM autoencoder

Detecting a structural anomaly, such as a damaged propeller or motor, is crucial for mission-critical operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The existing solutions often fail to detect structural anomalies because the pre-defined parameters required for the solution are limited in reflecting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pervasive and mobile computing Jg. 88; S. 101736
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, Seunghyeok, Kang, Jaeyun, Kim, Jiwon, Cha, Hojung
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 01.01.2023
Schlagworte:
LSTM autoencoder
Structural anomaly detection
UAV
Structural anomaly detection
LSTM autoencoder
UAV
ISSN:1574-1192, 1873-1589
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Detecting a structural anomaly, such as a damaged propeller or motor, is crucial for mission-critical operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The existing solutions often fail to detect structural anomalies because the pre-defined parameters required for the solution are limited in reflecting the flight pattern or the external environment, such as wind conditions. In this paper, we propose a method for detecting structural anomalies in quadcopter UAVs, using only regular data and specifically considering flight patterns and runtime flight conditions. To this end, we employ a long short-term memory (LSTM) autoencoder model to learn complex features of regular flight data. While flying the UAV, the trained model estimates the degree of outlierness of the incoming data and assesses abnormal behavior of UAV by adaptively considering its movement. This way, the proposed method accurately detects structural anomalies in UAVs regardless of the runtime environment or flight mission. Our experiment results with an off-the-shelf UAV show that the proposed approach detects diverse structural anomalies by an average of 98.6% specificity and 90.3% sensitivity.
ISSN:1574-1192
1873-1589
DOI:10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.101736