Effectiveness of Lateral Bone Augmentation on the Alveolar Crest Dimension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lateral ridge augmentation procedures are aimed to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges or to build up peri-implant dehiscence and fenestrations. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of these interventions by analyzing data from 40 clinical studies evaluating bone augm...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of dental research Ročník 94; číslo 9 Suppl; s. 128S
Hlavní autoři: Sanz-Sánchez, I, Ortiz-Vigón, A, Sanz-Martín, I, Figuero, E, Sanz, M
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.09.2015
Témata:
Alveolar Process - pathology
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - standards
Bone Transplantation - methods
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - standards
Humans
Membranes, Artificial
Treatment Outcome
bone substitutes
bone regeneration
alveolar bone loss
alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implant
bone transplantation
ISSN:1544-0591, 1544-0591
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Lateral ridge augmentation procedures are aimed to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges or to build up peri-implant dehiscence and fenestrations. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of these interventions by analyzing data from 40 clinical studies evaluating bone augmentation through either the staged or the simultaneous approach. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline for systematic reviews was used. The primary outcomes were the changes at reentry, in the ridge width, and in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the peri-implant defect, measured in millimeters, in the staged and simultaneous approaches, respectively. The results of the meta-analysis showed, for the simultaneous approach, a statistically significant defect height reduction when all treatments were analyzed together (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -4.28 mm; 95% confidence interval: [CI] -4.88, -3.69; P < 0.01). The intervention combining bone replacement grafts with barrier membranes was associated with superior outcomes The most frequently used intervention was the combination of xenograft and bioabsorbable membrane. Similarly, for the staged approach, there was a statistically significant horizontal gain when all treatment groups were combined (WMD = 3.90 mm; 95% CI: 3.52, 4.28; P < 0.001). The most frequently used intervention was the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment strategies led to high survival and success rates (>95%) for the implants placed on the regenerated sites. Nonexposed sites gained significantly more in the simultaneous and staged approaches (WMD = 1.1 and 3.1 mm).
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:1544-0591
1544-0591
DOI:10.1177/0022034515594780