Personal Recovery in the General Population: Comparison of Psychometric Properties of the Brief INSPIRE-O in Those With and Without Common Mental Disorders

The 5-item Brief INSPIRE-O instrument, based on the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning in Life, and Empowerment framework, is a novel tool to assess personal recovery. Although initially developed for clinical populations, its conceptual alignment with core dimensions of psychological well-being...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) s. 10731911251367122
Hlavní autori: Ruan, Xingjian, Vergeer-Hagoort, Femke, ten Have, Margreet, Luik, Annemarie I., Tuithof, Marlous, Bohlmeijer, Ernst, ten Klooster, Peter M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 16.09.2025
Predmet:
ISSN:1073-1911, 1552-3489, 1552-3489
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:The 5-item Brief INSPIRE-O instrument, based on the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning in Life, and Empowerment framework, is a novel tool to assess personal recovery. Although initially developed for clinical populations, its conceptual alignment with core dimensions of psychological well-being suggests its potential applicability to a broader audience. The current study aimed to examine its validity, reliability, and measurement invariance across people with and without common mental disorders (CMDs). The scale was administered in a Dutch general population sample ( n = 5,451). Confirmatory factor analyses supported a unidimensional structure with robust factor loadings and scalar invariance across individuals with and without CMDs in the past year. In addition, the Brief INPSIRE-O showed acceptable reliability (ω = .71–.78) and the expected pattern of correlations with other health indicators supported its construct validity. In conclusion, the Brief INSPIRE-O appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of positive psychological functioning that can be validly used and compared across people with and without CMDs.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1073-1911
1552-3489
1552-3489
DOI:10.1177/10731911251367122