Colonizing Canis lupus: Wolf Management as a Settler Colonial Project

ABSTRACT The hostility to wolves by segments of agribusiness and the general public in the United States is a puzzle, given that wolf predation is not responsible for a large number of cattle and sheep losses and has only a very modest economic effect on the livestock industry. Thus, the logic of pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rural sociology Vol. 90; no. 3
Main Authors: Beggen, Kristina, York, Richard
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2025
Subjects:
Agribusiness
Animal husbandry
Animals
Canidae
Capitalism
Colonialism
conservation
General public
Hostility
human–wildlife conflict
Indigenous peoples
Interpersonal relations
Kinship
Livestock
Livestock industry
livestock loss
Management
Predation
Public administration
settler colonialism
Sheep
Sociological theory
Wildlife management
Wolves
United States > US
ISSN:0036-0112, 1549-0831
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT The hostility to wolves by segments of agribusiness and the general public in the United States is a puzzle, given that wolf predation is not responsible for a large number of cattle and sheep losses and has only a very modest economic effect on the livestock industry. Thus, the logic of profit‐seeking in capitalism, although playing a role, is insufficient to explain the outsized and partisan opposition to wolf recovery. We argue that the logics of settler colonialism are a foundational force that shapes the politics and management of wolves in the United States. We explain how settler colonialism seeks to eliminate both Indigenous people and wolves to appropriate and reshape landscapes for settler use. Contemporary wolf policy and management at the state and federal levels continue to reflect settler colonial logics. Our general aim is to show how theories of settler colonialism complement other prominent sociological theories and enhance our understanding of the forces leading to ecological crises. We conclude by highlighting examples of more just approaches to wolf management that include Indigenous kinship and relational values.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0036-0112
1549-0831
DOI:10.1111/ruso.70009