Walk the Talk: The Effects of Apology and Reparation After Acts of Prejudice

ABSTRACT In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful response from a high‐status perpetrator. Across three studies using a 2 (apology: present, absent) × 2 (reparation: present, absent)...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of applied social psychology Ročník 55; číslo 11; s. 879 - 899
Hlavní autoři: Szanton, Elizabeth C., Kodipady, Aditi, Onyeador, Ivuoma N., Young, Liane
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2025
Témata:
ISSN:0021-9029, 1559-1816
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract ABSTRACT In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful response from a high‐status perpetrator. Across three studies using a 2 (apology: present, absent) × 2 (reparation: present, absent) within‐subjects design, we presented participants (Ntotal = 300) with 16 vignettes describing prejudicial harm and assessed the unique effects of apology and reparation on perceptions of the perpetrators' subsequent responses. We additionally examined whether apology and reparation operate via a cognitive mechanism (reevaluation of the harm itself) or via a relational mechanism (identification with the perpetrator). As predicted, the presence of an apology and of reparation each independently predicted more positive perceptions of the perpetrator's response. Reparation exerted a stronger effect than apology on ratings of response quality (Study 1) and on ratings of the response's impact (Studies 2 and 3); in some cases, if reparation was present, apology did not add value. Our findings suggest that, while apology operates primarily via a relational mechanism, reparation operates via both cognitive and relational mechanisms. Additionally, responses were perceived more favorably overall in the context of close relationships (Study 3), which contributes to existing evidence that relational closeness buffers against negative attributions about the perpetrator and their motives. We suggest that while apology and reparation are each key to an effective response, reparation plays a particularly important role in predicting positive reception to a response to prejudicial harm.
AbstractList In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful response from a high‐status perpetrator. Across three studies using a 2 (apology: present, absent) × 2 (reparation: present, absent) within‐subjects design, we presented participants ( N total = 300) with 16 vignettes describing prejudicial harm and assessed the unique effects of apology and reparation on perceptions of the perpetrators' subsequent responses. We additionally examined whether apology and reparation operate via a cognitive mechanism (reevaluation of the harm itself) or via a relational mechanism (identification with the perpetrator). As predicted, the presence of an apology and of reparation each independently predicted more positive perceptions of the perpetrator's response. Reparation exerted a stronger effect than apology on ratings of response quality (Study 1) and on ratings of the response's impact (Studies 2 and 3); in some cases, if reparation was present, apology did not add value. Our findings suggest that, while apology operates primarily via a relational mechanism, reparation operates via both cognitive and relational mechanisms. Additionally, responses were perceived more favorably overall in the context of close relationships (Study 3), which contributes to existing evidence that relational closeness buffers against negative attributions about the perpetrator and their motives. We suggest that while apology and reparation are each key to an effective response, reparation plays a particularly important role in predicting positive reception to a response to prejudicial harm.
In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful response from a high‐status perpetrator. Across three studies using a 2 (apology: present, absent) × 2 (reparation: present, absent) within‐subjects design, we presented participants (Ntotal = 300) with 16 vignettes describing prejudicial harm and assessed the unique effects of apology and reparation on perceptions of the perpetrators' subsequent responses. We additionally examined whether apology and reparation operate via a cognitive mechanism (reevaluation of the harm itself) or via a relational mechanism (identification with the perpetrator). As predicted, the presence of an apology and of reparation each independently predicted more positive perceptions of the perpetrator's response. Reparation exerted a stronger effect than apology on ratings of response quality (Study 1) and on ratings of the response's impact (Studies 2 and 3); in some cases, if reparation was present, apology did not add value. Our findings suggest that, while apology operates primarily via a relational mechanism, reparation operates via both cognitive and relational mechanisms. Additionally, responses were perceived more favorably overall in the context of close relationships (Study 3), which contributes to existing evidence that relational closeness buffers against negative attributions about the perpetrator and their motives. We suggest that while apology and reparation are each key to an effective response, reparation plays a particularly important role in predicting positive reception to a response to prejudicial harm.
ABSTRACT In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful response from a high‐status perpetrator. Across three studies using a 2 (apology: present, absent) × 2 (reparation: present, absent) within‐subjects design, we presented participants (Ntotal = 300) with 16 vignettes describing prejudicial harm and assessed the unique effects of apology and reparation on perceptions of the perpetrators' subsequent responses. We additionally examined whether apology and reparation operate via a cognitive mechanism (reevaluation of the harm itself) or via a relational mechanism (identification with the perpetrator). As predicted, the presence of an apology and of reparation each independently predicted more positive perceptions of the perpetrator's response. Reparation exerted a stronger effect than apology on ratings of response quality (Study 1) and on ratings of the response's impact (Studies 2 and 3); in some cases, if reparation was present, apology did not add value. Our findings suggest that, while apology operates primarily via a relational mechanism, reparation operates via both cognitive and relational mechanisms. Additionally, responses were perceived more favorably overall in the context of close relationships (Study 3), which contributes to existing evidence that relational closeness buffers against negative attributions about the perpetrator and their motives. We suggest that while apology and reparation are each key to an effective response, reparation plays a particularly important role in predicting positive reception to a response to prejudicial harm.
Author Szanton, Elizabeth C.
Kodipady, Aditi
Young, Liane
Onyeador, Ivuoma N.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Elizabeth C.
  orcidid: 0009-0005-2501-1229
  surname: Szanton
  fullname: Szanton, Elizabeth C.
  email: szant003@umn.edu
  organization: University of Minnesota Twin Cities
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Aditi
  surname: Kodipady
  fullname: Kodipady, Aditi
  organization: Princeton University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ivuoma N.
  surname: Onyeador
  fullname: Onyeador, Ivuoma N.
  organization: Northwestern University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Liane
  surname: Young
  fullname: Young, Liane
  organization: Boston College
BookMark eNp9kE9PwzAMxSM0JMbgwieIxA2pI86atuFWTeOfJjHBEMcobR1oGU1JOqF9ezK6M7742frZT3qnZNTaFgm5ADaFUNeN9t00ZYzDERmDEDKCDJIRGe9XkWRcnpBT75swSsGyMVm-6c0n7T-QroO4oeugFsZg2XtqDc07u7HvO6rbij5jp53ua9vS3PToaH6AVg6bbVWXeEaOjd54PD_0CXm9Xazn99Hy6e5hni-jkssMooobwY0sAWUcZxySNPiJDLKsAANxWhQmLoAnRVUIjWmJpdQVykIAJExqM5uQy-Fv5-z3Fn2vGrt1bbBUM54ySMVMiEBdDVTprPcOjepc_aXdTgFT-7TUPi31l1aAYYB_6g3u_iHVY_6yGm5-AVSibTA
Cites_doi 10.1073/pnas.1405072111
10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.008
10.1177/0957926511405573
10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101675
10.1177/00223433211024696
10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00024-6
10.1177/0190272514530412
10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096
10.1174/021347410790193504
10.1037/a0024462
10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105814
10.1037/xge0000292
10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104002
10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.003
10.1177/0957926508092244
10.1002/wcs.1572
10.1038/s44271-023-00033-w
10.1007/s11002-012-9218-x
10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406
10.1111/cdev.13069
10.1348/026151009X475343
10.1177/0146167206291005
10.1037/xge0001094
10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.004
10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02
10.1037/a0019993
10.1037/xae0001114
10.2139/ssrn.3812179
10.1007/978-3-030-76966-6_5
10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104544
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.061
10.1111/cdep.12216
10.1177/0265407512448277
10.65030/idr.08003
10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.742
10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.006
10.1111/sode.12413
10.1177/0964663911435519
10.1080/17439760.2012.690444
10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02550.x
10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.219
10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.04.007
10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105607
10.1177/0146167214525807
10.1037/ppm0000195
10.1177/0018726715611236
10.1177/1088868316649297
10.31234/osf.io/wf3tz
10.18637/jss.v082.i13-
10.1007/s42761-021-00055-9
10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110005
10.1002/bsl.495
10.1080/00224545.1994.9710877
10.1080/17439760.2017.1291854
10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105081
10.1037/apl0000271
10.1080/19392390903519065
10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00284
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x
10.1111/sode.12168
10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.009
10.1177/0091647120915181
10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.003
10.1162/opmi_a_00085
10.18637/jss.v067.i01
10.1007/s10551-018-3984-1
10.1353/sais.2005.0028
10.1111/jftr.12060
10.1002/ab.20119
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.09.004
10.5964/jspp.v7i1.673
10.1371/journal.pone.0145952
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
2025. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution License~https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
– notice: 2025. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution License~https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
7U4
8BJ
BHHNA
DWI
FQK
JBE
WZK
DOI 10.1111/jasp.70021
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Sociological Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Sociological Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sociology & Social History
EISSN 1559-1816
EndPage 899
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_jasp_70021
JASP70021
Genre article
GroupedDBID --Z
-ET
-~X
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
07C
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
24P
29J
31~
33P
3EH
3SF
4.4
4R4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6TJ
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
85S
8UM
930
9M8
A03
A8Z
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAUTI
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABUFD
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPVT
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADLEJ
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADXHL
ADZJE
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AETEA
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHEFC
AI.
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
ESI
ESTFP
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HAOEW
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
H~9
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LPU
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MS~
MVM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NHB
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
RXW
S10
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TAE
TEORI
TN5
UB1
UPT
UQL
V8K
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHDPE
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WQJ
WSUWO
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XIH
XOL
XSW
YQT
YR2
YYQ
ZCA
ZCG
ZGI
ZUP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
CITATION
O8X
7U4
8BJ
BHHNA
DWI
FQK
JBE
WZK
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2981-d2f52f9c1e94482167fec58188b1f147bbf4b126bdb5ae7cec9ade9b511609af3
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001582088000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0021-9029
IngestDate Fri Nov 14 11:11:47 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:53:29 EST 2025
Mon Nov 10 09:30:26 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Language English
License Attribution
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2981-d2f52f9c1e94482167fec58188b1f147bbf4b126bdb5ae7cec9ade9b511609af3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0009-0005-2501-1229
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjasp.70021
PQID 3270175355
PQPubID 5203
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_3270175355
crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_70021
wiley_primary_10_1111_jasp_70021_JASP70021
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2025
2025-11-00
20251101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2025
  text: November 2025
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Hoboken
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Journal of applied social psychology
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 1994; 134
2021; 208
2011; 114
2019; 90
2017; 82
2020a; 48
2013; 68
2006; 32
2013; 24
2023; 7
2021; 205
2020; 161
2023; 1
2024
2023; 228
2018; 44
1979
2005; 25
2004; 30
2018; 39
2010; 1
2010; 25
2021; 34
2021; 77
2010; 28
2004; 34
2020; 90
2011; 22
2013; 114
2012; 29
2007; 3
2012; 21
2001; 213
2010; 8
2019; 8
2019; 7
2021; 6
2022; 151
2021; 2
2024; 249
2017; 21
2008; 19
2017; 68
1997; 23
2018; 103
2015; 10
2008
1995
2005
2003; 39
2024; 10
2014; 111
2014; 40
2015; 7
2015; 67
2017; 94
2004; 53
2009; 30
1989; 56
2021; 12
2023
2015; 60
2002; 20
2013; 35
2020
2010; 136
2017; 11
1982; 43
2017; 13
2019
2018
2020; 118
2022; 59
2020; 24
2008; 44
2014
2011; 47
2012; 7
2017; 146
1998; 75
2016; 25
2016; 69
2014; 77
2020b; 11
2020; 29
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_52_1
e_1_2_9_50_1
e_1_2_9_73_1
e_1_2_9_79_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_56_1
e_1_2_9_77_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
e_1_2_9_54_1
e_1_2_9_71_1
Benoit W. L. (e_1_2_9_11_1) 2014
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_58_1
Quinn J. R. (e_1_2_9_60_1) 2008
e_1_2_9_41_1
e_1_2_9_64_1
e_1_2_9_87_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_89_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_45_1
e_1_2_9_68_1
e_1_2_9_83_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_43_1
e_1_2_9_66_1
e_1_2_9_85_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_81_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_49_1
Denham S. (e_1_2_9_18_1) 2005
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_47_1
Reimund M. E. (e_1_2_9_62_1) 2004; 53
e_1_2_9_30_1
Kline R. B. (e_1_2_9_37_1) 2023
e_1_2_9_53_1
e_1_2_9_74_1
e_1_2_9_51_1
e_1_2_9_72_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_57_1
e_1_2_9_78_2
e_1_2_9_78_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_55_1
e_1_2_9_76_1
e_1_2_9_70_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_59_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_42_1
e_1_2_9_63_1
e_1_2_9_88_1
e_1_2_9_40_1
e_1_2_9_61_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_46_1
e_1_2_9_67_1
e_1_2_9_84_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_44_1
e_1_2_9_65_1
e_1_2_9_86_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_80_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_82_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
Tajfel H. (e_1_2_9_75_1) 1979
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_48_1
e_1_2_9_69_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 11
  year: 2020b
  article-title: Apology and Restitution: The Psychophysiology of Forgiveness After Accountable Relational Repair Responses
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Fitting Linear Mixed‐Effects Models Using lme4
  publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software
– volume: 114
  start-page: 131
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 145
  article-title: Forgiveness and Its Determinants Depending on the Interpersonal Context of Hurt
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
– volume: 6
  start-page: 85
  year: 2021
  end-page: 109
– volume: 43
  start-page: 742
  issue: 4
  year: 1982
  end-page: 753
  article-title: Children's Reactions to Apologies
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 146
  start-page: 1379
  issue: 10
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1401
  article-title: Power as An Emotional Liability: Implications for Perceived Authenticity and Trust After a Transgression
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
– volume: 249
  year: 2024
  article-title: School‐Age Children Are More Skeptical of Inaccurate Robots Than Adults
  publication-title: Cognition
– volume: 1
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  article-title: Reminders of Japanese Redress Increase Asian American Support for Black Reparations
  publication-title: Communications Psychology
– start-page: 127
  year: 2005
  end-page: 142
– volume: 1
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 64
  article-title: A Trust Betrayed’: Celebrity and the Work of Emotion
  publication-title: Celebrity Studies
– volume: 60
  start-page: 133
  year: 2015
  end-page: 136
  article-title: Apologies Demanded Yet Devalued: Normative Dilution in the Age of Apology
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
– volume: 39
  start-page: 297
  issue: 4
  year: 2003
  end-page: 316
  article-title: Apology Versus Defense: Antecedents and Consequences
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 219
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 241
  article-title: Government Apologies for Historical Injustices
  publication-title: Political Psychology
– year: 2024
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1969
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1986
  article-title: The Emergence of Forgiveness in Young Children
  publication-title: Child Development
– year: 2018
– year: 2014
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1387
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1418
  article-title: When Saying Sorry May Not Help: Transgressor Power Moderates the Effect of an Apology on Forgiveness in the Workplace
  publication-title: Human Relations
– volume: 103
  start-page: 578
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  end-page: 590
  article-title: Understanding the Positive Effect of Financial Compensation on Trust After Norm Violations: Evidence From fMRI in Favor of Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology
– volume: 44
  start-page: 393
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  end-page: 406
  article-title: Seeking Sincerity, Finding Forgiveness: Youtube Apologies as Image Repair
  publication-title: Public Relations Review
– volume: 29
  start-page: 509
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 525
  article-title: To Err Is Human: Forgiveness Across Childhood and Adolescence
  publication-title: Social Development
– volume: 19
  start-page: 577
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  end-page: 598
  article-title: The Pragmatics of Forgiveness: Judgments of Apologies in the Israeli Political Arena
  publication-title: Discourse & Society
– volume: 90
  year: 2020
  article-title: Is Moral Redemption Possible? The Effectiveness of Public Apologies for Sexual Misconduct
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 620
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 650
  article-title: The Case for and Causes of Intraminority Solidarity in Support for Reparations: Evidence From Community and Student Samples in Canada
  publication-title: Journal of Social and Political Psychology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 165
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 187
  article-title: The Road to Reconciliation: Antecedents of Victim Willingness to Reconcile Following a Broken Promise
  publication-title: Journal of Management
– volume: 28
  start-page: 727
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 746
  article-title: When the Happy Victimizer Says Sorry: Children's Understanding of Apology and Emotion
  publication-title: British Journal of Developmental Psychology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Apologies in Close Relationships: A Review of Theory and Research
  publication-title: Journal of Family Theory & Review
– volume: 228
  year: 2023
  article-title: Beyond Accidents: Young Children's Forgiveness of Third‐Party Intentional Transgressors
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 507
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 531
  article-title: Apologizing for Historical Injustice: Emotion, Truth and Identity in Political Discourse
  publication-title: Discourse & Society
– volume: 2
  start-page: 363
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  end-page: 378
  article-title: Group‐Based Emotions and Support for Reparations: A Meta‐Analysis
  publication-title: Affective Science
– volume: 151
  start-page: 613
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  end-page: 627
  article-title: The Role of Theory of Mind, Group Membership, and Apology in Intergroup Forgiveness Among Children and Adolescents
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
– year: 2008
– volume: 32
  start-page: 195
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 206
  article-title: The Reduction of Psychological Aggression Across Varied Interpersonal Contexts Through Repentance and Forgiveness
  publication-title: Aggressive Behavior
– volume: 11
  start-page: 97
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  end-page: 101
  article-title: Causes and Consequences of Children's Forgiveness
  publication-title: Child Development Perspectives
– volume: 118
  start-page: 321
  year: 2020
  end-page: 334
  article-title: The Road to Consumer Forgiveness Is Paved With Money or Apology? The Roles of Empathy and Power in Service Recovery
  publication-title: Journal of Business Research
– volume: 23
  start-page: 177
  issue: 2
  year: 1997
  end-page: 186
  article-title: Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication
  publication-title: Public Relations Review
– volume: 7
  start-page: 294
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  end-page: 305
  article-title: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? Differential Effects of Apology and Restitution on Behavioral and Self‐Report Measures of Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Positive Psychology
– volume: 10
  start-page: 30
  issue: 3
  year: 2024
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Why Reparations? Race and Public Opinion Toward Reparations
  publication-title: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
– volume: 34
  start-page: 322
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 341
  article-title: When Social Accounts Backfire: The Exacerbating Effects of a Polite Message or an Apology on Reactions to an Unfair Outcome
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology
– volume: 24
  start-page: 293
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 309
  article-title: The Nature of An Apology: An Experimental Study on How to Apologize After a Service Failure
  publication-title: Marketing Letters
– volume: 68
  start-page: 601
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 625
  article-title: Experiments With More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Fandom, Forgiveness and Future Support: Youtube Apologies as Crisis Communication
  publication-title: Journal of Communication Management
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1248
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1262
  article-title: Young Children's Responses to Guilt Displays
  publication-title: Developmental Psychology
– volume: 68
  start-page: 255
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 278
  article-title: Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep It Maximal
  publication-title: Journal of Memory and Language
– volume: 77
  year: 2021
  article-title: When Apologies Become Meaningful: Perceptions of Apologies in Environmental Justice Communities
  publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology
– volume: 136
  start-page: 894
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 914
  article-title: The Road to Forgiveness: A Meta‐Analytic Synthesis of Its Situational and Dispositional Correlates
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 21
  start-page: 203
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 227
  article-title: Beyond Dominance and Competence: A Moral Virtue Theory of Status Attainment
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Review
– volume: 56
  issue: 2
  year: 1989
  article-title: Apology as Aggression Control: Its Role in Mediating Appraisal of and Response to Harm
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and social Psychology
– volume: 53
  start-page: 667
  year: 2004
  article-title: The Law and Restorative Justice: Friend or Foe‐A Systemic Look at the Legal Issues in Restorative Justice
  publication-title: Drake L. Rev.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 14
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  article-title: Repairing Trust Between Individuals and Groups: The Effectiveness of Apologies in Interpersonal and Intergroup Contexts
  publication-title: International Review of Social Psychology
– volume: 40
  start-page: 803
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  end-page: 815
  article-title: It Takes Two to Forgive: The Interactive Role of Relationship Value and Executive Control
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 48
  start-page: 88
  issue: 2
  year: 2020a
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Apology and Restitution: Offender Accountability Responses Influence Victim Empathy and Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Psychology and Theology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 114
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 123
  article-title: Do Sincere Apologies Need to be Costly? Test of a Costly Signaling Model of Apology
  publication-title: Evolution and Human Behavior
– volume: 208
  year: 2021
  article-title: Punishment Is Organized Around Principles of Communicative Inference
  publication-title: Cognition
– volume: 12
  issue: 6
  year: 2021
  article-title: Eliciting Forgiveness
  publication-title: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
– volume: 25
  start-page: 53
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Public Apologies as Performative Redress
  publication-title: SAIS Review of International Affairs
– volume: 25
  start-page: 742
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 758
  article-title: Making Amends: Children's Expectations About and Responses to Apologies
  publication-title: Social Development
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1389
  issue: 10
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1401
  article-title: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Validation in the Repentance–Forgiveness Process
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 94
  start-page: 305
  year: 2017
  end-page: 315
  article-title: Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models
  publication-title: Journal of Memory and Language
– volume: 35
  start-page: 95
  year: 2013
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Money Isn't All That Matters: The Use of Financial Compensation and Apologies to Preserve Relationships in the Aftermath of Distributive Harm
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Psychology
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 26
  article-title: Lmertest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
  publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software
– volume: 213
  start-page: 103
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 119
  article-title: Costly Signaling and Cooperation
  publication-title: Journal of Theoretical Biology Theoretical Biology
– volume: 77
  start-page: 123
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 149
  article-title: Apologies of the Rich and Famous: Cultural, Cognitive, and Social Explanations of Why We Care and Why We Forgive
  publication-title: Social Psychology Quarterly
– volume: 111
  start-page: 11211
  issue: 30
  year: 2014
  end-page: 11216
  article-title: Conciliatory Gestures Promote Forgiveness and Reduce Anger in Humans
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
– volume: 29
  start-page: 997
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1010
  article-title: Does Love Mean Never Having to Say You're Sorry? Associations Between Relationship Satisfaction, Perceived Apology Sincerity, and Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
– volume: 20
  start-page: 337
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  end-page: 362
  article-title: Apology in the Criminal Justice Setting: Evidence for Including Apology as an Additional Component in the Legal System
  publication-title: Behavioral Sciences & the Law
– start-page: 33
  year: 1979
  end-page: 47
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Apology, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation: An Ecological World View Framework
  publication-title: Individual Differences Research
– volume: 39
  start-page: 249
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  end-page: 256
  article-title: Costly Apologies Communicate Conciliatory Intention: An fMRI Study on Forgiveness in Response to Costly Apologies
  publication-title: Evolution and Human Behavior
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 8
  article-title: I'll Make It Up to You:’ Examining the Effect of Apologies on Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Positive Psychology
– volume: 44
  start-page: 983
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 992
  article-title: The Effects of Attributions of Intent and Apology on Forgiveness: When Saying Sorry May Not Help the Story
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 460
  year: 2023
  end-page: 482
  article-title: Virtue Discounting: Observability Reduces Moral Actors' Perceived Virtue
  publication-title: Open Mind
– volume: 134
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 1994
  end-page: 17
  article-title: Children's Reactions to Mitigating Accounts: Apologies, Excuses, and Intentionality of Harm
  publication-title: Journal of Social Psychology
– volume: 151
  issue: 5
  year: 2022
  article-title: Preferential Forgiveness: The Impact of Group Membership and Remorse on Preschoolers’ Forgiveness
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
– volume: 10
  issue: 12
  year: 2015
  article-title: Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence‐Versus Integrity‐Based Trust Violations
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 3
  start-page: 161
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 187
  article-title: Restorative Justice: What Is It and Does It Work?
  publication-title: Annual Review of Law and Social Science
– volume: 8
  start-page: 410
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  end-page: 419
  article-title: The Influence of Apology on Audiences' Reactions Toward a Media Figure's Transgression
  publication-title: Psychology of Popular Media Culture
– volume: 21
  start-page: 215
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Is Political Apology a Sorry Affair?
  publication-title: Social & Legal Studies
– year: 2020
– volume: 59
  start-page: 436
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  end-page: 448
  article-title: Examining the ‘Age of Apology’: Insights From the Political Apology Database
  publication-title: Journal of Peace Research
– year: 2023
– year: 1995
– start-page: 197
  year: 2019
  end-page: 209
– volume: 205
  year: 2021
  article-title: Children Are More Forgiving of Accidental Harms Across Development
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1586
  issue: 6
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1603
  article-title: Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 161
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 69
  article-title: Apology, Restitution, and Forgiveness After Psychological Contract Breach
  publication-title: Journal of Business Ethics
– volume: 25
  start-page: 101
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 115
  article-title: Official or Political Apologies and Improvement of Intergroup Relations: A Neo‐Durkheimian Approach to Official Apologies as Rituals
  publication-title: International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social
– volume: 114
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  end-page: 86
  article-title: In Money We Trust? The Use of Financial Compensations to Repair Trust in the Aftermath of Distributive Harm
  publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
– ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405072111
– ident: e_1_2_9_54_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.008
– start-page: 33
  volume-title: The Social Psychology of Inter‐Group Relations
  year: 1979
  ident: e_1_2_9_75_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1177/0957926511405573
– ident: e_1_2_9_58_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101675
– ident: e_1_2_9_89_1
  doi: 10.1177/00223433211024696
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00024-6
– ident: e_1_2_9_78_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1177/0190272514530412
– ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_67_1
  doi: 10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0096
– ident: e_1_2_9_56_1
  doi: 10.1174/021347410790193504
– ident: e_1_2_9_79_1
  doi: 10.1037/a0024462
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105814
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1037/xge0000292
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
– ident: e_1_2_9_70_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104002
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.003
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1177/0957926508092244
– ident: e_1_2_9_87_1
  doi: 10.1002/wcs.1572
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00033-w
– ident: e_1_2_9_65_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11002-012-9218-x
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406
– ident: e_1_2_9_55_1
  doi: 10.1111/cdev.13069
– ident: e_1_2_9_72_1
  doi: 10.1348/026151009X475343
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1177/0146167206291005
– ident: e_1_2_9_48_1
  doi: 10.1037/xge0001094
– ident: e_1_2_9_78_2
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
– ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_52_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.004
– ident: e_1_2_9_64_1
  doi: 10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1037/a0019993
– ident: e_1_2_9_80_1
  doi: 10.1037/xae0001114
– ident: e_1_2_9_63_1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3812179
– ident: e_1_2_9_61_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76966-6_5
– ident: e_1_2_9_68_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104544
– ident: e_1_2_9_84_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.061
– ident: e_1_2_9_83_1
  doi: 10.1111/cdep.12216
– ident: e_1_2_9_69_1
  doi: 10.1177/0265407512448277
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.65030/idr.08003
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.742
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_74_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_81_1
  doi: 10.1111/sode.12413
– volume-title: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
  year: 2023
  ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_76_1
  doi: 10.1177/0964663911435519
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.690444
– ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
– ident: e_1_2_9_71_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02550.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_50_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.219
– ident: e_1_2_9_66_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.04.007
– ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105607
– ident: e_1_2_9_82_1
  doi: 10.1177/0146167214525807
– start-page: 127
  volume-title: Handbook of Forgiveness
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1037/ppm0000195
– volume: 53
  start-page: 667
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_9_62_1
  article-title: The Law and Restorative Justice: Friend or Foe‐A Systemic Look at the Legal Issues in Restorative Justice
  publication-title: Drake L. Rev.
– ident: e_1_2_9_88_1
  doi: 10.1177/0018726715611236
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1177/1088868316649297
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.31234/osf.io/wf3tz
– ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13-
– volume-title: The Age of Apology: Facing Up to the Past
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_9_60_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00055-9
– ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110005
– ident: e_1_2_9_59_1
  doi: 10.1002/bsl.495
– ident: e_1_2_9_51_1
  doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9710877
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1291854
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105081
– volume-title: Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1037/apl0000271
– ident: e_1_2_9_49_1
  doi: 10.1080/19392390903519065
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_85_1
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00284
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/sode.12168
– ident: e_1_2_9_57_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.009
– ident: e_1_2_9_86_1
  doi: 10.1177/0091647120915181
– ident: e_1_2_9_77_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.003
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00085
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3984-1
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1353/sais.2005.0028
– ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
  doi: 10.1111/jftr.12060
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1002/ab.20119
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_53_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.09.004
– ident: e_1_2_9_73_1
  doi: 10.5964/jspp.v7i1.673
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145952
SSID ssj0029508
Score 2.4479012
Snippet ABSTRACT In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a...
In an era of abundant high‐profile apologies, many of which are perceived to be cheap and insincere, it is crucial to understand what constitutes a meaningful...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 879
SubjectTerms Apologies
apology
Attribution
Closeness
Cognition
Perceptions
Perpetrators
Prejudice
Ratings & rankings
reparation
Reparations
Vignettes
Title Walk the Talk: The Effects of Apology and Reparation After Acts of Prejudice
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjasp.70021
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3270175355
Volume 55
WOSCitedRecordID wos001582088000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1559-1816
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0029508
  issn: 0021-9029
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LSwMxEB5q68GLb7G1loDiQVhp0k13I14WtYiUUrTV3pYkmwUftKXbCv5789iu9SKItxySEGZnMt8s-b4BOGUtmWLpE4_xkHl-EHJPg1jqCUKl1CnI55a39tQNer1wNGL9ElwtuTBOH6L44WYiw97XJsC5yFaDnGfTi8DkqDWoYNwKTeMG4veLcsv0N3UPPMwjBMJycVL7jqdY-zMdfWPMVaRqU01n63-H3IbNHGKiyPnEDpTUeBdqBTMFnSHHyUVOIuRzD7rP_P0NaSiIBnpwibTvICdrnKFJiqKpW8jHCdKAnTunQZFpL46ifFJ_pl4Xib529mHYuR1c33l5mwVPEhZiLyEpJSmTWDFdqxHcDvT-VCfyUOAU-4EQqS8waYtEUK4CqSTjiWJCQ7V2k_G0dQDl8WSsDgEpXX2FbaExI0t8P-Fcl2dUNnFKDeGVsSqcLK0dT52aRlxUIdpUsTVVFerLDxHnEZXFLRI0jaoopVU4tyb_ZYf4Pnrs21HtL5OPYIOY9r6WaliH8ny2UMewLj_mL9msYb2rAZWbh86w-wV5eNGG
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LSwMxEB60CnrxLbZWDSgehJVumuxuvC1i8bGWglV7W5JsFnzQlj4E_715bNd6EcRbDkkIk5nMN2HmG4AT1pS5Lwn2GI-YR8KIexrEUk9gKqV2QYTburWnJGy3o16PdYrcHFML4_ghyg83Yxn2vTYGbj6k562cj4fnoXFSi7BEtJsxao5Jp4y3TINTl-FhshAwK9hJbSJPufanP_oGmfNQ1fqa1vo_T7kBawXIRLHTik1YUP0tqJW1KegUuapc5EhCPrcheebvb0iDQdTVgwuktQc5YuMxGuQoHrqFvJ8hDdm5UxsUmwbjKC4mdUbqdZrph2cHHltX3ctrr2i04EnMIt_LcE5xzqSvmI7WsB-Een-qXXkk_NwnoRA5ET4ORCYoV6FUkvFMMaHBWtBgPG_uQqU_6Ks9QErHX1EgNGpkGSEZ5zpAo7Lh59SUvDJWheOZuNOh49NIyzhEiyq1oqpCfXYTaWFT47SJw4bhFaW0CmdW5r_skN7GDx07qv1l8hGsXHfvkzS5ad_twyo2zX5t4WEdKpPRVB3AsvyYvIxHh1bVvgBu0dPR
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFD7oJuKLd3FzakDxQaisWbM2vhXn8FJG0U33VpI0AS9sYxfBf2_SdHW-COJbH5JQTs_J-U4533cATmlDKFd42KEsoI7nB8zRIJY4HBMhdAryWMZbe4r8Tifo92mc9-YYLozVhyh-uJnIyO5rE-BylKrFKGeT0YVvktQylD0zRaYE5dZDuxcVFZcZcWp7PEwfAqa5PmnWylPs_pmRvmHmIljNsk1745_vuQnrOcxEofWLLViSg22oFuwUdIYsLxdZmZDPHYie2fsb0nAQdfXDJdL-g6y08QQNFQpHdiMbpEiDdmYdB4VmxDgK80XxWL7OUn317EKvfd29unHyUQuOwDRwnRQrghUVrqS6XsNu09fnE53MA-4q1_M5Vx53cZOnnDDpCykoSyXlGq4165Spxh6UBsOB3AckdQUWNLnGjTT1vJQxXaIRUXcVMaRXSitwMjd3MrKKGklRiWhTJZmpKlCbf4kkj6pJ0sB-3SiLElKB88zmv5yQ3IWPcfZU_cviY1iNW-0kuu3cH8AaNtN-M-ZhDUrT8Uwewor4mL5Mxke5r30BJWDU5w
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Walk+the+Talk%3A+The+Effects+of+Apology+and+Reparation+After+Acts+of+Prejudice&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+social+psychology&rft.au=Szanton%2C+Elizabeth+C.&rft.au=Kodipady%2C+Aditi&rft.au=Onyeador%2C+Ivuoma+N.&rft.au=Young%2C+Liane&rft.date=2025-11-01&rft.issn=0021-9029&rft.eissn=1559-1816&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjasp.70021&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_jasp_70021
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-9029&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-9029&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-9029&client=summon