Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada's Smart City Challenge
Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged as part of the “smart” development process, particularly given the significant financial investments often required to meaningfully design sma...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Canadian geographer Jg. 64; H. 3; S. 416 - 432 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Toronto
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0008-3658, 1541-0064 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged as part of the “smart” development process, particularly given the significant financial investments often required to meaningfully design smart city projects. To better understand approaches to public engagement in the context of smart city development, we draw upon three selected finalists of Infrastructure Canada's Smart City Challenge, which invited municipalities, regional governments, and Indigenous communities to enter a competition where the winning proposals would be awarded federal financial grants to complete their projects. Prizes of $5 million, $10 million, and $50 million were awarded. Specifically, we compare the public engagement experiences of the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne (Quebec), the City of Guelph, and the Region of Waterloo. We carried out semi‐structured interviews and reviewed documents in each community to better understand how finalists in each category engaged residents in proposal development. The paper addresses how communities are approaching public engagement in smart city development and the implications of these approaches. We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool.
Key Messages
The Smart City Challenge's focus on citizen engagement highlights tension in municipal smart city design processes between top‐down and bottom‐up policymaking.
Using the IAP2 Spectrum for Public Participation to evaluate proposals of three finalist communities suggests varied approaches to engaging residents in smart city design.
We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool.
La participation des citoyens au développement de la ville intelligente: les leçons du concours canadien sur les villes intelligentes
La qualité de vie est souvent perçue comme étant le principal avantage de la mise en place des villes intelligentes. Toutefois, ceci soulève des questions sur la nature de la participation des citoyens à ce processus, en raison des investissements financiers importants requis pour concevoir les projets de ville intelligente. Pour mieux comprendre les approches à l'égard de la participation dans le contexte du développement de la ville intelligente, nous avons étudié les projets des trois finalistes sélectionnés lors du concours sur les villes intelligentes d'Infrastructure Canada, Rappelons que les propositions gagnantes se voyaient accorder des subventions financières fédérales pour réaliser leurs projets. Des prix de 5, 10 et 50 millions de dollars ont ainsi été attribués. Cet article évalue la façon dont les collectivités abordent la participation des citoyens dans le développement de la ville intelligente et les implications des différentes approches utilisées. Dans ce contexte, nous comparons les expériences de participation publique du Conseil mohawk d'Akwesasne, au Québec, de la Ville de Guelph et de la région de Waterloo. Nous avons effectué des entretiens semi‐directifs et analysé des documents dans chaque collectivité pour mieux comprendre la façon dont les finalistes ont mobilisé les résidents dans le développement de la proposition. Nos résultats montrent que malgré les tentatives sincères d'impliquer la population et d'adopter une approche centrée sur les citoyens, les administrations municipales continuent de considérer la participation civique comme un outil allant du haut vers le bas. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged as part of the “smart” development process, particularly given the significant financial investments often required to meaningfully design smart city projects. To better understand approaches to public engagement in the context of smart city development, we draw upon three selected finalists of Infrastructure Canada's Smart City Challenge, which invited municipalities, regional governments, and Indigenous communities to enter a competition where the winning proposals would be awarded federal financial grants to complete their projects. Prizes of $5 million, $10 million, and $50 million were awarded. Specifically, we compare the public engagement experiences of the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne (Quebec), the City of Guelph, and the Region of Waterloo. We carried out semi‐structured interviews and reviewed documents in each community to better understand how finalists in each category engaged residents in proposal development. The paper addresses how communities are approaching public engagement in smart city development and the implications of these approaches. We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool.
Key Messages
The Smart City Challenge's focus on citizen engagement highlights tension in municipal smart city design processes between top‐down and bottom‐up policymaking.
Using the IAP2 Spectrum for Public Participation to evaluate proposals of three finalist communities suggests varied approaches to engaging residents in smart city design.
We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool.
La participation des citoyens au développement de la ville intelligente: les leçons du concours canadien sur les villes intelligentes
La qualité de vie est souvent perçue comme étant le principal avantage de la mise en place des villes intelligentes. Toutefois, ceci soulève des questions sur la nature de la participation des citoyens à ce processus, en raison des investissements financiers importants requis pour concevoir les projets de ville intelligente. Pour mieux comprendre les approches à l'égard de la participation dans le contexte du développement de la ville intelligente, nous avons étudié les projets des trois finalistes sélectionnés lors du concours sur les villes intelligentes d'Infrastructure Canada, Rappelons que les propositions gagnantes se voyaient accorder des subventions financières fédérales pour réaliser leurs projets. Des prix de 5, 10 et 50 millions de dollars ont ainsi été attribués. Cet article évalue la façon dont les collectivités abordent la participation des citoyens dans le développement de la ville intelligente et les implications des différentes approches utilisées. Dans ce contexte, nous comparons les expériences de participation publique du Conseil mohawk d'Akwesasne, au Québec, de la Ville de Guelph et de la région de Waterloo. Nous avons effectué des entretiens semi‐directifs et analysé des documents dans chaque collectivité pour mieux comprendre la façon dont les finalistes ont mobilisé les résidents dans le développement de la proposition. Nos résultats montrent que malgré les tentatives sincères d'impliquer la population et d'adopter une approche centrée sur les citoyens, les administrations municipales continuent de considérer la participation civique comme un outil allant du haut vers le bas. Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged as part of the “smart” development process, particularly given the significant financial investments often required to meaningfully design smart city projects. To better understand approaches to public engagement in the context of smart city development, we draw upon three selected finalists of Infrastructure Canada's Smart City Challenge, which invited municipalities, regional governments, and Indigenous communities to enter a competition where the winning proposals would be awarded federal financial grants to complete their projects. Prizes of $5 million, $10 million, and $50 million were awarded. Specifically, we compare the public engagement experiences of the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne (Quebec), the City of Guelph, and the Region of Waterloo. We carried out semi‐structured interviews and reviewed documents in each community to better understand how finalists in each category engaged residents in proposal development. The paper addresses how communities are approaching public engagement in smart city development and the implications of these approaches. We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool. Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged as part of the “smart” development process, particularly given the significant financial investments often required to meaningfully design smart city projects. To better understand approaches to public engagement in the context of smart city development, we draw upon three selected finalists of Infrastructure Canada's Smart City Challenge, which invited municipalities, regional governments, and Indigenous communities to enter a competition where the winning proposals would be awarded federal financial grants to complete their projects. Prizes of $5 million, $10 million, and $50 million were awarded. Specifically, we compare the public engagement experiences of the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne (Quebec), the City of Guelph, and the Region of Waterloo. We carried out semi‐structured interviews and reviewed documents in each community to better understand how finalists in each category engaged residents in proposal development. The paper addresses how communities are approaching public engagement in smart city development and the implications of these approaches. We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool . The Smart City Challenge's focus on citizen engagement highlights tension in municipal smart city design processes between top‐down and bottom‐up policymaking. Using the IAP2 Spectrum for Public Participation to evaluate proposals of three finalist communities suggests varied approaches to engaging residents in smart city design. We conclude that, despite earnest attempts to publicly engage and become citizen‐centric, municipal governments continue to see civic participation as a top‐down tool. La qualité de vie est souvent perçue comme étant le principal avantage de la mise en place des villes intelligentes. Toutefois, ceci soulève des questions sur la nature de la participation des citoyens à ce processus, en raison des investissements financiers importants requis pour concevoir les projets de ville intelligente. Pour mieux comprendre les approches à l'égard de la participation dans le contexte du développement de la ville intelligente, nous avons étudié les projets des trois finalistes sélectionnés lors du concours sur les villes intelligentes d'Infrastructure Canada, Rappelons que les propositions gagnantes se voyaient accorder des subventions financières fédérales pour réaliser leurs projets. Des prix de 5, 10 et 50 millions de dollars ont ainsi été attribués. Cet article évalue la façon dont les collectivités abordent la participation des citoyens dans le développement de la ville intelligente et les implications des différentes approches utilisées. Dans ce contexte, nous comparons les expériences de participation publique du Conseil mohawk d'Akwesasne, au Québec, de la Ville de Guelph et de la région de Waterloo. Nous avons effectué des entretiens semi‐directifs et analysé des documents dans chaque collectivité pour mieux comprendre la façon dont les finalistes ont mobilisé les résidents dans le développement de la proposition. Nos résultats montrent que malgré les tentatives sincères d'impliquer la population et d'adopter une approche centrée sur les citoyens, les administrations municipales continuent de considérer la participation civique comme un outil allant du haut vers le bas . |
| Author | Goodman, Nicole Spicer, Zachary Carlsen, Nina Zwick, Austin |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nicole surname: Goodman fullname: Goodman, Nicole organization: Brock University – sequence: 2 givenname: Austin orcidid: 0000-0003-3727-055X surname: Zwick fullname: Zwick, Austin email: alzwick@maxwell.syr.edu organization: Syracuse University – sequence: 3 givenname: Zachary surname: Spicer fullname: Spicer, Zachary organization: University of Western Ontario – sequence: 4 givenname: Nina surname: Carlsen fullname: Carlsen, Nina organization: Syracuse University |
| BookMark | eNp9kE9LAzEQxYNUsK0e_AYBD-Jh22Q3-89bWbQKBQX1vEyT2Zqym9TNrtJvb7b1JOhcwkze703yJmRkrEFCLjmbcV9zCZsZDxOWnpAxjwUPGEvEiIwZY1kQJXF2RibObX3LRJyNSfXcr2stKZoNbLBB01FtqGug7ajU3Z4q_MTa7oabW7pC56xxtGptQ6Vtmt7oTqMbmAIMKLh29OUAFwNcvENde2s8J6cV1A4vfs4pebu_ey0egtXT8rFYrAIZ5mkaIMhKZpGSIkURMrVGBcBVKECkqYrAT2XE04rFEcpYZRAnKoHM_y2PVRVl0ZRcHX13rf3o0XXl1vat8SvLMGZ5FIosF151c1TJ1jrXYlXuWu1fvS85K4cYSx9jeYjRa-e_tD4W6LQ1XQu6_o_40jXu_7Yui8XySHwDrQCGhQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3399016 crossref_primary_10_1177_23996544251320261 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scs_2021_103148 crossref_primary_10_1080_07293682_2022_2116463 crossref_primary_10_17645_up_v8i2_6524 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings13082085 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13063397 crossref_primary_10_57111_devt_2_2023_39 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOA_12_2024_5109 crossref_primary_10_1177_10780874231222243 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0269089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cities_2023_104442 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings13061484 crossref_primary_10_17269_s41997_024_00883_9 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7724020 crossref_primary_10_3992_jgb_19_3_139 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12040876 crossref_primary_10_1108_SASBE_05_2024_0178 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsc_2022_960400 crossref_primary_10_1177_0160323X251343025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10708_022_10688_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15054619 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2022_113279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2025_107557 crossref_primary_10_1080_13511610_2023_2266579 crossref_primary_10_17645_up_v8i2_7034 crossref_primary_10_32604_cmc_2024_054007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeog_2025_103773 crossref_primary_10_1080_02723638_2023_2235940 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15021591 crossref_primary_10_1080_07352166_2025_2502116 crossref_primary_10_1111_cag_12644 crossref_primary_10_1002_sres_2787 crossref_primary_10_1111_capa_12460 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13010376 crossref_primary_10_3390_su162410967 crossref_primary_10_3390_smartcities5020026 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/21565503.2019.1629314 10.1080/01944366908977225 10.1080/00049180500325694 10.2307/976169 10.56021/9781421416359 10.1068/d070381 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134 10.1162/INOV_a_00056 10.1177/0032329292020004003 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 10.3233/IP-150367 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8 10.1177/147309520200100105 10.1093/cjres/rsu013 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026413.001.0001 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<597::AID-JID610>3.0.CO;2-Q 10.1007/978-3-658-16112-5_12 10.1080/13604810802479126 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00587.x 10.1353/jod.1995.0002 10.1515/9780691234168-007 10.1068/b100071 10.3390/su8030207 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2020 Canadian Association of Geographers / L'Association canadienne des géographes |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Canadian Association of Geographers / L'Association canadienne des géographes |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7ST 8BJ C1K FQK JBE SOI |
| DOI | 10.1111/cag.12607 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Environment Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Environment Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environment Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
| DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Geography |
| EISSN | 1541-0064 |
| EndPage | 432 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1111_cag_12607 CAG12607 |
| Genre | article |
| GeographicLocations | Canada |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Canada |
| GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA 0-V 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29B 2QL 31~ 33P 3V. 4.4 4IJ 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 7PT 7XC 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FQ 8G5 8GL 8R4 8R5 8UM 930 A04 AAESR AAHHS AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJCF ABJNI ABUWG ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADNMO ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYN AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFGKR AFKFF AFKRA AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHEFC AI. AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMBMR AMYDB ARALO ASTYK ATCPS AVQMV AZBYB AZQEC AZVAB BAFTC BCR BCU BDRZF BEC BENPR BES BFHJK BGLVJ BHPHI BKOMP BKSAR BLC BMXJE BNVMJ BPHCQ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CCPQU COF D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DWQXO EAD EAP EAYBP EBS ECC EJD EMK ESX F00 F01 FEDTE G-S G.N G50 GICCO GNUQQ GODZA GUQSH HCIFZ HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IAO ICQ IEA IGS IHE IHI IMW IOF ISN ISR ITC IX1 J0M K48 K50 KWQ L6V LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LK5 LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M1D M2O M2P M2Q M2R M3C M3G M7R M7S MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OHT OIG P2P P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PATMY PCBAR PEA PQQKQ PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q.N Q11 Q2X QB0 QF4 QN7 QO5 R.K R05 RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWL RX1 S0X S10 SJFOW SUPJJ TAE TN5 TWZ U5U UB1 UHB ULY VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WII WMRSR WOHZO WQZ WRC WSUWO XG1 XOL ZCA ZCG ZHY ZZTAW ~IA ~WP 702 AAYXX AEYWJ AFFHD AGQPQ AIQQE CITATION F5P O8X PEJEM PHGZM PHGZT PMKZF PQGLB PRQQA ~02 7ST 8BJ C1K FQK JBE SOI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-eacfc83dc47e420dbedaa1d24a477d3a7e4c317f053ec5d8a56d6a800895df383 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 44 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000522303800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0008-3658 |
| IngestDate | Mon Nov 10 00:41:11 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:23:48 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:47:38 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:32:37 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2977-eacfc83dc47e420dbedaa1d24a477d3a7e4c317f053ec5d8a56d6a800895df383 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3727-055X |
| PQID | 2509324894 |
| PQPubID | 37554 |
| PageCount | 17 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2509324894 crossref_primary_10_1111_cag_12607 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cag_12607 wiley_primary_10_1111_cag_12607_CAG12607 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2020 text: 2020-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Toronto |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Toronto |
| PublicationTitle | The Canadian geographer |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | 1989; 7 2015; 11 2002; 1 1998 1976 2008 1983; 10 1996 2008; 12 1969; 35 1973 1994 1992 2001; 22 2011; 6 1995; 6 1956 2005; 25 1999 1998; 19 2019; 84 2000 1986; 46 1987 2016; 21 2019 2018 1999; 11 2017 2014; 79 2016 2015 2003; 29 2014; 18 1992; 20 2014; 8 2016; 8 2005; 36 e_1_2_10_23_1 e_1_2_10_46_1 US DOT (US Department of Transportation) (e_1_2_10_56_1) 2015 e_1_2_10_40_1 City of Ottawa (e_1_2_10_14_1) 2018 Hirst P. Q. (e_1_2_10_32_1) 1994 Allied Market Research (e_1_2_10_2_1) 2019 Nielsen K. (e_1_2_10_45_1) 2019 Region of Waterloo (e_1_2_10_48_1) 2018 e_1_2_10_53_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_16_1 e_1_2_10_39_1 e_1_2_10_55_1 e_1_2_10_57_1 e_1_2_10_34_1 Faludi A. (e_1_2_10_20_1) 1973 Amy D. J. (e_1_2_10_4_1) 1987 Dahl R. A. (e_1_2_10_18_1) 1956 Government of Canada (e_1_2_10_27_1) 2017 Kamenova K. (e_1_2_10_37_1) 2015; 11 Bliss L. (e_1_2_10_8_1) 2016 Mukherjee S. (e_1_2_10_43_1) 2019 e_1_2_10_29_1 Smith L. (e_1_2_10_52_1) 1999 e_1_2_10_25_1 e_1_2_10_24_1 Fraser N. (e_1_2_10_22_1) 1996 e_1_2_10_41_1 Statistics Canada (e_1_2_10_54_1) 2016 Dickson G. (e_1_2_10_19_1) 2001; 22 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_17_1 e_1_2_10_38_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 e_1_2_10_15_1 e_1_2_10_36_1 Schumpeter J. A. (e_1_2_10_50_1) 1976 City of Guelph and County of Wellington (e_1_2_10_12_1) 2018 City of Hamilton (e_1_2_10_13_1) 2018 Hall P. (e_1_2_10_30_1) 1992 e_1_2_10_35_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_59_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_33_1 Wylie B. (e_1_2_10_58_1) 2018 Graham K. A. (e_1_2_10_28_1) 1998 e_1_2_10_31_1 Scott J. (e_1_2_10_51_1) 1998 Fourtané S. (e_1_2_10_21_1) 2019 City of Guelph (e_1_2_10_11_1) 2015 e_1_2_10_49_1 e_1_2_10_26_1 Mouffe C. (e_1_2_10_42_1) 2000 Musulin K. (e_1_2_10_44_1) 2019 e_1_2_10_47_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 19 start-page: 173 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 202 article-title: Review of community‐based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health publication-title: Annual Review of Public Health – year: 2019 article-title: Methodological and academic challenges in Canadian political science: The value of a socially engaged approach for Indigenous research publication-title: Politics, Groups, and Identities – year: 1956 – volume: 12 start-page: 303 issue: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 320 article-title: Will the real smart city please stand up? publication-title: City – volume: 6 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 1995 end-page: 78 article-title: Bowling alone: America's declining social capital publication-title: Journal of Democracy – volume: 46 start-page: 170 issue: 2 year: 1986 end-page: 178 article-title: Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 6 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 40 article-title: Government as a platform publication-title: innovations – year: 2019 article-title: Transit tech lab's mission to solve NYC's subway ‘crisis’ publication-title: Smart Cities Dive – year: 2019 article-title: Region of Waterloo falls short in Smart Cities Challenge bid publication-title: Global News – year: 1987 – volume: 11 start-page: 4 issue: 2 year: 2015 article-title: Public engagement with internet voting in Edmonton: Design, outcomes, and challenges to deliberative models publication-title: Journal of Public Deliberation – volume: 21 start-page: 6176 issue: 1 year: 2016 article-title: How are citizens involved in smart cities? Analysing citizen participation in Japanese “Smart Communities” publication-title: Information Polity – year: 1973 – volume: 36 start-page: 283 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 299 article-title: Public participation in planning: An intellectual history publication-title: Australian Geographer – year: 2000 – volume: 7 start-page: 381 issue: 4 year: 1989 end-page: 395 article-title: Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning publication-title: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space – volume: 8 start-page: 79 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 92 article-title: Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems publication-title: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society – volume: 79 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 14 article-title: The real‐time city? Big data and smart urbanism publication-title: GeoJournal – volume: 10 start-page: 71 issue: 1 year: 1983 end-page: 87 article-title: Ideology, politics, and planning: Reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning publication-title: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design – volume: 20 start-page: 393 issue: 4 year: 1992 end-page: 472 article-title: Secondary associations in democratic governance publication-title: Politics and Society – year: 2016 – year: 2018 – volume: 8 start-page: 207 issue: 3 year: 2016 article-title: Where's Wally? In search of citizen perspectives on the smart city publication-title: Sustainability – year: 1992 – year: 1994 – start-page: 120 year: 1996 end-page: 136 – volume: 22 issue: 5 year: 2001 article-title: Participatory action research: Lessons learned with Aboriginal grandmothers publication-title: Health Care for Women International – year: 1998 – volume: 1 start-page: 77 issue: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 99 article-title: Towards a post‐positivist typology of planning theory publication-title: Planning Theory – start-page: 249 year: 2017 end-page: 266 – year: 2019 article-title: Smart cities market to garner $2.402 trillion by 2025 with CAGR of 21.28%, globally publication-title: Globe News Wire – volume: 84 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 13 article-title: Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland publication-title: GeoJournal – volume: 18 start-page: 307 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 320 article-title: Smart cities as corporate storytelling publication-title: City – year: 2019 article-title: Evreka! There's a solution for smart waste collection management in smart cities publication-title: Interesting Engineering – volume: 25 start-page: 32 year: 2005 end-page: 35 article-title: Planning through inclusive dialogue: No escape from social choice dilemmas publication-title: Economic Affairs – volume: 11 start-page: 597 year: 1999 end-page: 612 article-title: Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development publication-title: Journal of International Development – year: 2008 – year: 2019 article-title: Smart cities: Rebuilding the Indian urban landscape publication-title: Dataquest – start-page: 299 year: 2016 end-page: 314 – volume: 29 start-page: 515 year: 2003 end-page: 539 article-title: Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes and realities publication-title: Annual Review of Sociology – start-page: 197 year: 1996 end-page: 208 – year: 2016 article-title: Columbus wins the U.S. DOTs smart cities challenge publication-title: CityLab – year: 2017 – volume: 35 start-page: 216 issue: 4 year: 1969 end-page: 224 article-title: A ladder of citizen participation publication-title: Journal of the American Planning Association – year: 2019 – year: 1976 – year: 2015 – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_10_24_1 doi: 10.1080/21565503.2019.1629314 – volume-title: Smart Region of Waterloo Application year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_10_48_1 – year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 article-title: Columbus wins the U.S. DOTs smart cities challenge publication-title: CityLab – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_43_1 article-title: Smart cities: Rebuilding the Indian urban landscape publication-title: Dataquest – volume-title: 2016 Census of Canada: Profile data for City of Guelph, Region of Waterloo, and Mohawk Council of Akwesasne year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_10_54_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225 – ident: e_1_2_10_35_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_41_1 doi: 10.1080/00049180500325694 – ident: e_1_2_10_17_1 doi: 10.2307/976169 – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_44_1 article-title: Transit tech lab's mission to solve NYC's subway ‘crisis’ publication-title: Smart Cities Dive – ident: e_1_2_10_38_1 doi: 10.56021/9781421416359 – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1068/d070381 – ident: e_1_2_10_23_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134 – volume-title: Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_10_52_1 – volume-title: Associative democracy year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_10_32_1 – volume-title: Smart Cities Challenge application year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_46_1 doi: 10.1162/INOV_a_00056 – volume-title: Citizen engagement: Lessons in participation from local government year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_10_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_16_1 doi: 10.1177/0032329292020004003 – start-page: 197 volume-title: Radical democracy: Identity, citizenship and the state year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_10_22_1 – volume-title: Press release: Government of Canada launches the smart city challenge year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_10_27_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_40_1 doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 – volume-title: Urban and regional planning year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_10_30_1 – volume-title: Community engagement framework year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_45_1 article-title: Region of Waterloo falls short in Smart Cities Challenge bid publication-title: Global News – ident: e_1_2_10_29_1 doi: 10.3233/IP-150367 – volume-title: Searching for the smart city's democratic future year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_10_58_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_36_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 – volume-title: Hamilton's Public Engagement Committee, Charter, Policy & Toolkit year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_10_13_1 – volume-title: Capitalism, socialism and democracy year: 1976 ident: e_1_2_10_50_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_53_1 doi: 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8 – volume-title: The politics of environmental mediation year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1177/147309520200100105 – ident: e_1_2_10_26_1 doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu013 – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026413.001.0001 – volume-title: Smart city challenge year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_10_56_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_15_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<597::AID-JID610>3.0.CO;2-Q – ident: e_1_2_10_57_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-16112-5_12 – volume-title: The democratic paradox year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_10_42_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_33_1 doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126 – ident: e_1_2_10_49_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00587.x – volume: 22 start-page: 471482 issue: 5 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_10_19_1 article-title: Participatory action research: Lessons learned with Aboriginal grandmothers publication-title: Health Care for Women International – ident: e_1_2_10_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_47_1 doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002 – ident: e_1_2_10_59_1 doi: 10.1515/9780691234168-007 – volume-title: Public Engagement: Summary of public consultations year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_10_14_1 – volume-title: Planning theory year: 1973 ident: e_1_2_10_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_39_1 doi: 10.1068/b100071 – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 article-title: Smart cities market to garner $2.402 trillion by 2025 with CAGR of 21.28%, globally publication-title: Globe News Wire – volume-title: A preface to democratic theory year: 1956 ident: e_1_2_10_18_1 – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_21_1 article-title: Evreka! There's a solution for smart waste collection management in smart cities publication-title: Interesting Engineering – volume-title: Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve human condition have failed year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_10_51_1 – volume: 11 start-page: 4 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_10_37_1 article-title: Public engagement with internet voting in Edmonton: Design, outcomes, and challenges to deliberative models publication-title: Journal of Public Deliberation – ident: e_1_2_10_55_1 doi: 10.3390/su8030207 |
| SSID | ssj0000458 |
| Score | 2.416941 |
| Snippet | Quality of life is often touted as the main benefit of building smart cities. This, however, raises questions about the extent to which the public is engaged... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 416 |
| SubjectTerms | American Indians cadre de l'Association internationale pour la participation publique (IAP2) Cities Citizen participation Community concours sur les villes intelligentes d'Infrastructure Canada First Nations Grants IAP2 Framework Indigenous peoples Infrastructure Infrastructure Canada Smart City Challenge Investments Local government Mohawk Municipalities Participation participation publique Premières nations public engagement Public participation Quality of life Questions Regions Smart cities villes intelligentes |
| Title | Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada's Smart City Challenge |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcag.12607 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2509324894 |
| Volume | 64 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000522303800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1541-0064 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000458 issn: 0008-3658 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEB5qK-jFt1itsoigl0iTbJpET6VaPZQiaqG3sM9a0ChNFfz3zm6StoKC4C2EnU2YnZn9Zpn9BuAkdrnLGTfG21QOZT53uK99x1NRHCitKZPaNpsI-_1oOIzvKnBZ3oXJ-SFmB27GM2y8Ng7OeLbg5IKNzl1E4-ES1Dy026AKtav77qA3D8Q0yAOxOQLEnbYgFjKFPDPh79vRHGMuIlW71XTX__WTG7BWIEzSzk1iEyoq3YKVotn50-c26Pyojqh0VFS-kHFKshc0IiIQlBM5LyS6ID0MhWiZxNxDISK_TmJIWI2MpTZgpxl5sMIdI9wpu7PswKB7_di5dYp2C47wEAU6GIK1iHwpaKio15RcScZc6VFGw1D6DN8KRBsa3VaJQEYsaMkWQ8CJqyo1Zrq7UE1fU7UHRLdUiJmKiLgKKGKSyLIE-U0tmlJz163DWan1RBRc5KYlxnNS5iSouMQqrg7Hs6FvOQHHT4Ma5dIlhQ9mCYI7BKc0iil-zi7S7xMknfaNfdj_-9ADWPVM8m0LzhpQnU7e1SEsi4_pOJscFcb4BSA74vE |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwED_mJuiL3-J0ahBBXyr9SNdOfBnTOXEO0Q32VtJ8zIFW2abgf-8lbbcJCoJvpeTSktxdfndcfgdwXHNiJ2axVl5bWpR5sRV7yrNcGdZ8qRRlQplmE0GnE_b7tfsCXOR3YVJ-iGnCTVuG8dfawHVCes7KORucOQjHgwUoUVQj1O_S5UOz1555YuqnnljnAPGozZiFdCXPVPj7eTQDmfNQ1Zw1zdX__eUarGQYk9RTpViHgkw2YClrd_70uQkqTdYRmQyy2hcyTMj4BdWIcITlRMxKic5JG50h6ibRN1EITy-UaBpWLWPIDdjJmDwa4YYWbuT9Wbag17zqNlpW1nDB4i7iQAudsOKhJzgNJHVtEUvBmCNcymgQCI_hW454Q6HhSu6LkPlVUWUIOXFfhcJYdxuKyWsid4CoqgwwVuFhLH2KqCQ0PEGerbgtVOw4ZTjNlz3iGRu5borxHOVRCS5cZBauDEfToW8pBcdPgyr53kWZFY4jhHcIT2lYo_g5s0u_TxA16tfmYffvQw9hqdW9a0ftm87tHiy7OhQ35WcVKE5G73IfFvnHZDgeHWSa-QW7O-bh |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwED_mJuqL3-J0ahBBXyr9SNdOfBmbU3GMoQ58K2k-5kDr2Kbgf-8lbbcJCoJvpeTScrm7_C5cfgdwUnNiJ2axNl5bWpR5sRV7yrNcGdZ8qRRlQplmE0GnEz491boFuMzvwqT8ENMDN-0ZJl5rB5dDoea8nLP-uYNwPFiAEtVNZIpQat63eu1ZJKZ-Gon1GSButRmzkK7kmQp_349mIHMeqpq9prX2v79ch9UMY5J6ahQbUJDJJixn7c6fP7dApYd1RCb9rPaFDBIyfkUzIhxhORGzUqIL0sZgiLZJ9E0UwtMLJZqGVcsYcgN2OiYPRrihhRt5f5Zt6LWuHhs3VtZwweIu4kALg7DioSc4DSR1bRFLwZgjXMpoEAiP4VuOeEOh40rui5D5VVFlCDlxXYXCXHcHislbIneBqKoMMFfhYSx9iqgkNDxBnq24LVTsOGU4y9Ue8YyNXDfFeInyrAQVFxnFleF4OnSYUnD8NKiSr12UeeE4QniH8JSGNYqfM6v0-wRRo35tHvb-PvQIlrrNVtS-7dztw4qrM3FTfVaB4mT0Lg9gkX9MBuPRYWaYX2t75lw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public+engagement+in+smart+city+development%3A+Lessons+from+communities+in+Canada%27s+Smart+City+Challenge&rft.jtitle=The+Canadian+geographer&rft.au=Goodman%2C+Nicole&rft.au=Zwick%2C+Austin&rft.au=Spicer%2C+Zachary&rft.au=Carlsen%2C+Nina&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0008-3658&rft.eissn=1541-0064&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcag.12607&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0008-3658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0008-3658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0008-3658&client=summon |