Precoder Design For Multi-Group Multicasting With a Common Message
This paper considers precoding for multi-group multicasting with a common message. The multiple antenna base station communicates with K clusters, each with L users. There is a common message destined to all users and a private multicast message for each cluster. We study the weighted sum rate (WSR)...
Saved in:
| Published in: | IEEE transactions on communications Vol. 67; no. 10; pp. 7302 - 7315 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
IEEE
01.10.2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0090-6778, 1558-0857 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper considers precoding for multi-group multicasting with a common message. The multiple antenna base station communicates with K clusters, each with L users. There is a common message destined to all users and a private multicast message for each cluster. We study the weighted sum rate (WSR) maximization problem for two different schemes: 1) the base station transmits the superposition of common and multicast messages and 2) the base station concatenates the multicast message vector with the common message. We also formulate a second problem, weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE) minimization, and prove that WSR maximization and WMMSE minimization are equivalent at the optimal solution. Inspired by the WMMSE problem, we suggest a suboptimal algorithm, based on alternating optimization. We apply this algorithm to the two transmission schemes and understand that there is a fundamental difference between the two. We compare the results with maximal ratio transmission (MRT) and zero-forcing (ZF) precoding and investigate the effects of the number of base station antennas, the number of groups, and the number of users in a group. Finally, we study imperfect successive interference cancellation (SIC) at the receivers and show that the first transmission scheme is more robust. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0090-6778 1558-0857 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2931580 |