Comparative computational analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm bullet moving at Mach 2.0 in close vicinity to the wall

Comparative Computational Analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm Bullet Moving at Mach 2.0 in Close Vicinity to the Wall Various rifles require unique bullets. Each bullet has its capability, speed, and impact on the target. In metropolitan warfare, several bullets are shot close t...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:FME transactions Ročník 51; číslo 1; s. 81 - 89
Hlavní autori: Salunke, Samruddhi, Shinde, Suryapratap, Gholap, Tanmay, Sahoo, Devabrata
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: University of Belgrade - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade 2023
Predmet:
ISSN:1451-2092, 2406-128X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Comparative Computational Analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm Bullet Moving at Mach 2.0 in Close Vicinity to the Wall Various rifles require unique bullets. Each bullet has its capability, speed, and impact on the target. In metropolitan warfare, several bullets are shot close to the solid walls. These near walls affect the pressure distribution over the entire asymmetric bullet. The influence of a reflected shock depends on the angle at which it was reflected and the altitude from the ground to the body of the bullet. The current research emphasizes three bullets of varying diameters used in different types of guns. The first bullet is of NATO 5.56 mm, the second is APM2's 7.62 mm bullet, and the third is a 7.82 mm bullet from an AK-47 rifle. For 2-D steady computations, the supersonic speed of Mach 2 is considered to analyze the flowfield across all three bullets. The heights of the bullet are taken considering the height-to-diameter ratios (h/D ratio) from 0.5 to 3.0. The Mach contour drawn from the numerical simulations is used to analyze the flowfield, and aerodynamic coefficients like lift, drag, and moment are also plotted to analyze the ground effects on the projectile. The comparative analysis showed that the trend of shock wave reflections was similar in the bullets till h/D of 1.5. The APM2 bullet experienced maximum drag, followed by AK-47's 7.82 mm and NATO's 5.56 mm bullet. The 7.82 mm bullet experienced maximum lifting force at h/D = 1.0 due to its larger surface area than the other two ammo. The 7.82 mm bullet experienced a nose-up moment, whereas the other two faced a nose-down moment. As the altitude of the bullets from the ground increased, the ground effect appearing on the bullets reduced. The present comparative analysis research shows that it is suitable to fire an AK-47 bullet from h/D greater than 2.0 and the other two bullets from an altitude greater than or equal to h/D of 3.0.
AbstractList Comparative Computational Analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm Bullet Moving at Mach 2.0 in Close Vicinity to the Wall Various rifles require unique bullets. Each bullet has its capability, speed, and impact on the target. In metropolitan warfare, several bullets are shot close to the solid walls. These near walls affect the pressure distribution over the entire asymmetric bullet. The influence of a reflected shock depends on the angle at which it was reflected and the altitude from the ground to the body of the bullet. The current research emphasizes three bullets of varying diameters used in different types of guns. The first bullet is of NATO 5.56 mm, the second is APM2's 7.62 mm bullet, and the third is a 7.82 mm bullet from an AK-47 rifle. For 2-D steady computations, the supersonic speed of Mach 2 is considered to analyze the flowfield across all three bullets. The heights of the bullet are taken considering the height-to-diameter ratios (h/D ratio) from 0.5 to 3.0. The Mach contour drawn from the numerical simulations is used to analyze the flowfield, and aerodynamic coefficients like lift, drag, and moment are also plotted to analyze the ground effects on the projectile. The comparative analysis showed that the trend of shock wave reflections was similar in the bullets till h/D of 1.5. The APM2 bullet experienced maximum drag, followed by AK-47's 7.82 mm and NATO's 5.56 mm bullet. The 7.82 mm bullet experienced maximum lifting force at h/D = 1.0 due to its larger surface area than the other two ammo. The 7.82 mm bullet experienced a nose-up moment, whereas the other two faced a nose-down moment. As the altitude of the bullets from the ground increased, the ground effect appearing on the bullets reduced. The present comparative analysis research shows that it is suitable to fire an AK-47 bullet from h/D greater than 2.0 and the other two bullets from an altitude greater than or equal to h/D of 3.0.
Author Salunke, Samruddhi
Sahoo, Devabrata
Shinde, Suryapratap
Gholap, Tanmay
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Samruddhi
  surname: Salunke
  fullname: Salunke, Samruddhi
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Suryapratap
  surname: Shinde
  fullname: Shinde, Suryapratap
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Tanmay
  surname: Gholap
  fullname: Gholap, Tanmay
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Devabrata
  surname: Sahoo
  fullname: Sahoo, Devabrata
BookMark eNpNkUtP5DAQhK0VK-3wOO0f6PtuhrZjO85xNFpYxGsl5sAt6vgBRkmMEjNo_gK_esNDiEt3Van0XWqf7Q1p8Iz95LhUdVkdh96LEjkafvONLYREXXBhbvfYgkvFC4G1-MGOpukBEQXnplR6wV7WqX-kkXLcerCzfsqzTgN1QPPZTXGCFOBqtbkGtVQa-v43rP5dCqiWWsxurjlYnReymhPzlrRPXecz9GkbhzugDJdk70EsEeIAtkuTh220cYh5BzlBvvfwTF13yL4H6iZ_9PEP2Obkz2b9t7i4Pj1bry4KK2qZC_Iag-M6hMBRSUG8xtZI4Y2XJI1Wc42XSso6VNYp540yHrU3KIRQZXnAzt6xLtFD8zjGnsZdkyg2b0Ea7xoac7Sdb1rukStyrlSVtI6bEIypWqdbTVhXbmb9emfZMU3T6MMnj2PzOkrzZZTyP-FjfRc
Cites_doi 10.1007/978-3-540-85181-3_118
10.2322/tjsass.62.219
10.2514/6.2014-0214
10.1007/978-981-32-9931-3_40
10.1109/PuneCon52575.2021.9686472
10.5937/fme2004761D
10.1007/978-3-319-46213-4_109
10.5937/fme2201024M
10.1117/12.725226
10.5937/fmet1903552T
10.2514/1.J054114
10.2514/1.J050505
10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.001
10.5937/fme2201369G
10.5937/fme2004779T
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.5937/fme2301081S
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 2406-128X
EndPage 89
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_b1e015add3574cd18ff887bd6b6a097d
10_5937_fme2301081S
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARCSS
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
OK1
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-ae60fd16fff10542a190b842e8e4a4865c29135449f7cd5de858e06e80222533
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 2
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000943167400009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1451-2092
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:53:44 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:17:55 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c294t-ae60fd16fff10542a190b842e8e4a4865c29135449f7cd5de858e06e80222533
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/b1e015add3574cd18ff887bd6b6a097d
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b1e015add3574cd18ff887bd6b6a097d
crossref_primary_10_5937_fme2301081S
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-00-00
2023-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2023
  text: 2023-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle FME transactions
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher University of Belgrade - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade
Publisher_xml – name: University of Belgrade - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref11
ref10
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref13
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85181-3_118
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.2322/tjsass.62.219
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.2514/6.2014-0214
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9931-3_40
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1109/PuneCon52575.2021.9686472
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.5937/fme2004761D
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46213-4_109
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.5937/fme2201024M
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1117/12.725226
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.5937/fmet1903552T
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.2514/1.J054114
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.2514/1.J050505
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.001
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.5937/fme2201369G
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.5937/fme2004779T
– ident: ref12
SSID ssj0002118356
Score 2.2396216
Snippet Comparative Computational Analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm Bullet Moving at Mach 2.0 in Close Vicinity to the Wall Various rifles...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 81
SubjectTerms bullet's computational aerodynamics
external ballistics
ground effect
near wall proximity
urban warfare
Title Comparative computational analysis of NATO 5.56 mm, APM2 7.62 mm and AK-47 7.82 mm bullet moving at Mach 2.0 in close vicinity to the wall
URI https://doaj.org/article/b1e015add3574cd18ff887bd6b6a097d
Volume 51
WOSCitedRecordID wos000943167400009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2406-128X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002118356
  issn: 1451-2092
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JSsRAEG1EPOhBXHGnDh7NmKTXHMdBEXRGwTl4C72iMIto1H_wq610osaTF48pmhBedXe9qnS_IuSYBcsFdTwRLLiE5U4nxvs0MVxzUzDhuItdS67laKTu74vbTquv-kxYIw_cAHdqMo8RC1ch5ZJZl6kQcF0YJ4zQaSFdvfsi6-kkU_UejGkNUovmahHPcCoUeXM5j2M4Rpd5ZN4ZRsO7X-Goo9ofw8vFGllteSH0m-9ZJwt-tkFWOmqBm-Rj8KPUDTZ2Y2greaBbaRGYBxj1xzfAe1zAdHoC_dthDrIncnzCYQ76VwmTaFHRYqL6NkxjXQF0BUNtHyDvpfA4AzuZv3h4q_-9I1eHag7IFuFdTyZbZHxxPh5cJm0rhcTmBasS7UUaXCZCCEioWK6RBxjFcq8800wJjsMyyhkrgrToH6-48qnwKuaDlG6Txdl85ncICOoRfma0Ty2TMtWBWiupdqmlTAWzS46_AC2fGsGMEhONGveyg_suOavB_h5Sq1xHA_q-bH1f_uX7vf94yT5ZrlvIN2WVA7JYPb_6Q7Jk36rHl-ejOK0-ASXwzpk
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+computational+analysis+of+NATO+5.56+mm%2C+APM2+7.62+mm+and+AK-47+7.82+mm+bullet+moving+at+Mach+2.0+in+close+vicinity+to+the+wall&rft.jtitle=FME+transactions&rft.au=Salunke%2C+Samruddhi&rft.au=Shinde%2C+Suryapratap&rft.au=Gholap%2C+Tanmay&rft.au=Sahoo%2C+Devabrata&rft.date=2023&rft.issn=1451-2092&rft.eissn=2406-128X&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=89&rft_id=info:doi/10.5937%2Ffme2301081S&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5937_fme2301081S
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1451-2092&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1451-2092&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1451-2092&client=summon