Computational implementation of bounding surface model and its verification through cavity benchmark problems

This paper develops an implicit integration algorithm for a general form of the bounding surface model, using the return mapping approach (elastic predictor‐plastic corrector), to obtain the updated stresses for given strain increments. The formulation of the constitutive integration requires the de...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics Ročník 46; číslo 3; s. 553 - 569
Hlavní autoři: Chen, Shengli, Abousleiman, Younane, Muraleetharan, Kanthasamy K.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2022
Témata:
ISSN:0363-9061, 1096-9853
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This paper develops an implicit integration algorithm for a general form of the bounding surface model, using the return mapping approach (elastic predictor‐plastic corrector), to obtain the updated stresses for given strain increments. The formulation of the constitutive integration requires the derivation of a supplementary differential equation to describe the evolution of a key variable, that is, the ratio between the image stress and the current stress quantities. The integration algorithm for the bounding surface model is implemented into the finite element analysis commercial program, ABAQUS, through the material interface of UMAT (user defined material subroutine), and then used for the analysis of cavity contraction (wellbore drilling/tunnel excavation) boundary value problems. The predictions from the ABAQUS simulations are found to be in excellent agreement with the analytical solutions, thus demonstrating the validity and accuracy of the proposed integration scheme.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0363-9061
1096-9853
DOI:10.1002/nag.3311