Exact Random Coding Error Exponents of Optimal Bin Index Decoding

We consider ensembles of channel codes that are partitioned into bins, and focus on analysis of exact random coding error exponents associated with an optimum decoding of the index of the bin to which the transmitted codeword belongs. Two main conclusions arise from this analysis. First, for an inde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on information theory Vol. 60; no. 10; pp. 6024 - 6031
Main Author: Merhav, Neri
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01.10.2014
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
ISSN:0018-9448, 1557-9654
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We consider ensembles of channel codes that are partitioned into bins, and focus on analysis of exact random coding error exponents associated with an optimum decoding of the index of the bin to which the transmitted codeword belongs. Two main conclusions arise from this analysis. First, for an independent random selection of codewords within a given type class, the random coding exponent of an optimal bin index decoding is given by the ordinary random coding exponent function, computed at the rate of the entire code, independently of the exponential rate of the size of the bin. Second, for this ensemble of codes, suboptimal bin index decoding, which is based on an ordinary maximum likelihood decoding, is as good as the optimal bin index decoding in terms of the random coding error exponent achieved. Finally, for the sake of completeness, we also outline how our analysis of exact random coding exponents extends to the hierarchical ensemble that correspond to superposition coding and optimal decoding, where for each bin, first, a cloud center is drawn at random, and then the codewords of this bin are drawn conditionally indepenently given the cloud center. For this ensemble, the two conclusions, mentioned above, no longer hold necessarily in general.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0018-9448
1557-9654
DOI:10.1109/TIT.2014.2348554