Collaborative Magnetic Manipulation via Two Robotically Actuated Permanent Magnets

Magnetically actuated robots have proven effective in several applications, specifically in medicine. However, generating high actuating fields with a high degree of manipulability is still a challenge, especially when the application needs a large workspace to suitably cover a patient. The presente...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on robotics Jg. 39; H. 2; S. 1 - 12
Hauptverfasser: Pittiglio, Giovanni, Brockdorff, Michael, da Veiga, Tomas, Davy, Joshua, Chandler, James Henry, Valdastri, Pietro
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York IEEE 01.04.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1552-3098, 1941-0468
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Magnetically actuated robots have proven effective in several applications, specifically in medicine. However, generating high actuating fields with a high degree of manipulability is still a challenge, especially when the application needs a large workspace to suitably cover a patient. The presented work discusses a novel approach for the control of magnetic field and field gradients using two robotically actuated permanent magnets. In this case, permanent magnets-relative to coil-based systems-have the advantage of larger field density without energy consumption. We demonstrate that collaborative manipulation of the two permanent magnets can introduce up to three additional Degrees of Freedom (DOFs) when compared to single permanent magnet approaches (five DOFs). We characterized the dual-arm system through the measurement of the fields and gradients and show accurate open-loop control with a 13.5% mean error. We then demonstrate how the magnetic DOFs can be employed in magnetomechanical manipulation, by controlling and measuring the wrench on two orthogonal magnets within the workspace, observing a maximum crosstalk of 6.1% and a mean error of 11.1%.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1552-3098
1941-0468
DOI:10.1109/TRO.2022.3209038