The western North American forestland carbon sink: will our climate commitments go up in smoke?

Pathways to achieving net‐zero and net‐negative greenhouse‐gas (GHG) emission targets rely on land‐based contributions to carbon (C) sequestration. However, projections of future contributions neglect to consider ecosystems, climate change, legacy impacts of continental‐scale fire exclusion, forest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in ecology and the environment Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 1 - n/a
Main Authors: Hessburg, Paul F, Kurz, Werner A, Prichard, Susan J, Smyth, Carolyn E, Daniels, Lori D, Giardina, Christian P, Phillips, Carly A, Gray, Robert W, Tiribelli, Florencia, Baron, Jennifer N, LaFlamme, Jocelyne, Roeser, Dominik
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington Ecological Society of America 01.10.2025
Subjects:
Carbon
Carbon sinks
Climate change
Densification
Drought
Emissions control
Environmental impact
Forests
Greenhouse gases
Insects
Net zero
Pest outbreaks
Pests
Smoke
Wildfires
ISSN:1540-9295, 1540-9309
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pathways to achieving net‐zero and net‐negative greenhouse‐gas (GHG) emission targets rely on land‐based contributions to carbon (C) sequestration. However, projections of future contributions neglect to consider ecosystems, climate change, legacy impacts of continental‐scale fire exclusion, forest accretion and densification, and a century or more of management. These influences predispose western North American forests (wNAFs) to severe drought impacts, large and chronic outbreaks of insect pests, and increasingly large and severe wildfires. To realistically assess contributions of future terrestrial C sinks, we must quantify the amount and configuration of stored C in wNAFs, its vulnerability to severe disturbance and climatic changes, costs and net GHG impacts of feasible transitions to conditions that can tolerate active fire, and opportunities for redirecting thinning‐derived biomass to uses that retain harvested C while reducing emissions from alternate products. Failing to adopt this broader mindset, future forest contributions to emission targets will go up in smoke.
Bibliography:These authors contributed equally to this work
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1540-9295
1540-9309
DOI:10.1002/fee.2869