Empirics vs. art theory: Exploring a factor structure of pictorial expression based on contemporary artworks

The RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Creativity research journal Jg. 37; H. 1; S. 148 - 166
Hauptverfasser: Schoch, Kerstin, Ostermann, Thomas
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Philadelphia Routledge 02.01.2025
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Schlagworte:
art theory
confirmatory factor analysis
Factor Structure
formal picture analysis
Path Analysis
pictorial expression
visual art
ISSN:1040-0419, 1532-6934
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1040-0419
1532-6934
DOI:10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104