Coverage optimization for IoT-based network using Monarch Butterfly Optimization with greedy strategy and self-adaptive crossover operator

In the dynamic development of technology, the Internet of Things (IoT) stands as a driving force of innovation and opening new frontiers. Data collection and processing in IoT systems provide services to decision making in various fields including home automation, disaster management, healthcare, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of parallel, emergent and distributed systems Vol. 39; no. 6; pp. 696 - 711
Main Authors: Pavithra, R., Arivudainambi, D., Afizudeen, S., Poorani, T.S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 01.11.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Adaptive algorithms
Crossovers
Greedy algorithms
Heuristic methods
Internet of Things
Meta-heuristic algorithm
Optimal sensor placement
Optimization
Quality of coverage
Statistical analysis
Variance analysis
Wireless sensor network
ISSN:1744-5760, 1744-5779
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the dynamic development of technology, the Internet of Things (IoT) stands as a driving force of innovation and opening new frontiers. Data collection and processing in IoT systems provide services to decision making in various fields including home automation, disaster management, healthcare, and so on. In such services, the IoT has certain limitations to perform the required tasks and it can cause extreme consequences in the network. One of the main challenge in IoT is to ensure maximum coverage by optimally placing the sensors. To address the coverage problem, a meta-heuristic algorithm Monarch Butterfly Optimization with greedy strategy and self-adaptive crossover operator (GCMBO) is proposed for Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP) in 3D monitoring region. The performance of proposed algorithm is evaluated by a series of simulation and it provide efficient results when compared to other similar existing optimization algorithms. Additionally, a statistical analysis (ANOVA and LSD post-hoc) is exhibited from the comparative results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1744-5760
1744-5779
DOI:10.1080/17445760.2024.2417870