A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees
Objectives Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Per...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Cochlear implants international Ročník 15; číslo 3; s. 145 - 160 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
England
Taylor & Francis
01.05.2014
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1467-0100, 1754-7628, 1754-7628 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Objectives
Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Percept (MAP) and appropriate MAP becomes the key issue in the habilitation program. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, objective measures become paramount to predict optimal current levels to be set in the MAP. We aimed to (a) study the trends in multi-modal electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses sequentially over the first year of implant use; (b) generate normative data from the above; (c) correlate the multi-modal electrophysiological thresholds levels with behavioural comfort levels; and (d) create predictive formulae for deriving optimal comfort levels (if unknown), using linear and multiple regression analysis.
Methods
This prospective study included 10 profoundly hearing impaired children aged between 2 and 7 years with normal inner ear anatomy and no additional handicaps. They received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90 K Implant with Harmony Speech processor and used HiRes-P with Fidelity 120 strategy. They underwent, impedance telemetry, neural response imaging, electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry (ESRT), and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) tests at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of implant use, in conjunction with behavioural mapping. Trends in electrophysiological and behavioural responses were analyzed using paired t-test. By Karl Pearson's correlation method, electrode-wise correlations were derived for neural response imaging (NRI) thresholds versus most comfortable level (M-levels) and offset based (apical, mid-array, and basal array) correlations for EABR and ESRT thresholds versus M-levels were calculated over time. These were used to derive predictive formulae by linear and multiple regression analysis. Such statistically predicted M-levels were compared with the behaviourally recorded M-levels among the cohort, using Cronbach's alpha reliability test method for confirming the efficacy of this method.
Results
NRI, ESRT, and EABR thresholds showed statistically significant positive correlations with behavioural M-levels, which improved with implant use over time. These correlations were used to derive predicted M-levels using regression analysis. On an average, predicted M-levels were found to be statistically reliable and they were a fair match to the actual behavioural M-levels. When applied in clinical practice, the predicted values were found to be useful for programming members of the study group. However, individuals showed considerable deviations in behavioural M-levels, above and below the electrophysiologically predicted values, due to various factors. While the current method appears helpful as a reference to predict initial maps in 'difficult to Map' subjects, it is recommended that behavioural measures are mandatory to further optimize the maps for these individuals.
Conclusion
The study explores the trends, correlations and individual variabilities that occur between electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses, recorded over time among a cohort of cochlear implantees. The statistical method shown may be used as a guideline to predict optimal behavioural levels in difficult situations among future implantees, bearing in mind that optimal M-levels for individuals can vary from predicted values. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, following a protocol of sequential behavioural programming, in conjunction with electrophysiological correlates will provide the best outcomes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Percept (MAP) and appropriate MAP becomes the key issue in the habilitation program. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, objective measures become paramount to predict optimal current levels to be set in the MAP. We aimed to (a) study the trends in multi-modal electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses sequentially over the first year of implant use; (b) generate normative data from the above; (c) correlate the multi-modal electrophysiological thresholds levels with behavioural comfort levels; and (d) create predictive formulae for deriving optimal comfort levels (if unknown), using linear and multiple regression analysis.
This prospective study included 10 profoundly hearing impaired children aged between 2 and 7 years with normal inner ear anatomy and no additional handicaps. They received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90 K Implant with Harmony Speech processor and used HiRes-P with Fidelity 120 strategy. They underwent, impedance telemetry, neural response imaging, electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry (ESRT), and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) tests at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of implant use, in conjunction with behavioural mapping. Trends in electrophysiological and behavioural responses were analyzed using paired t-test. By Karl Pearson's correlation method, electrode-wise correlations were derived for neural response imaging (NRI) thresholds versus most comfortable level (M-levels) and offset based (apical, mid-array, and basal array) correlations for EABR and ESRT thresholds versus M-levels were calculated over time. These were used to derive predictive formulae by linear and multiple regression analysis. Such statistically predicted M-levels were compared with the behaviourally recorded M-levels among the cohort, using Cronbach's alpha reliability test method for confirming the efficacy of this method.
NRI, ESRT, and EABR thresholds showed statistically significant positive correlations with behavioural M-levels, which improved with implant use over time. These correlations were used to derive predicted M-levels using regression analysis. On an average, predicted M-levels were found to be statistically reliable and they were a fair match to the actual behavioural M-levels. When applied in clinical practice, the predicted values were found to be useful for programming members of the study group. However, individuals showed considerable deviations in behavioural M-levels, above and below the electrophysiologically predicted values, due to various factors. While the current method appears helpful as a reference to predict initial maps in 'difficult to Map' subjects, it is recommended that behavioural measures are mandatory to further optimize the maps for these individuals.
The study explores the trends, correlations and individual variabilities that occur between electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses, recorded over time among a cohort of cochlear implantees. The statistical method shown may be used as a guideline to predict optimal behavioural levels in difficult situations among future implantees, bearing in mind that optimal M-levels for individuals can vary from predicted values. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, following a protocol of sequential behavioural programming, in conjunction with electrophysiological correlates will provide the best outcomes. Objectives Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Percept (MAP) and appropriate MAP becomes the key issue in the habilitation program. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, objective measures become paramount to predict optimal current levels to be set in the MAP. We aimed to (a) study the trends in multi-modal electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses sequentially over the first year of implant use; (b) generate normative data from the above; (c) correlate the multi-modal electrophysiological thresholds levels with behavioural comfort levels; and (d) create predictive formulae for deriving optimal comfort levels (if unknown), using linear and multiple regression analysis. Methods This prospective study included 10 profoundly hearing impaired children aged between 2 and 7 years with normal inner ear anatomy and no additional handicaps. They received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90 K Implant with Harmony Speech processor and used HiRes-P with Fidelity 120 strategy. They underwent, impedance telemetry, neural response imaging, electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry (ESRT), and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) tests at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of implant use, in conjunction with behavioural mapping. Trends in electrophysiological and behavioural responses were analyzed using paired t-test. By Karl Pearson's correlation method, electrode-wise correlations were derived for neural response imaging (NRI) thresholds versus most comfortable level (M-levels) and offset based (apical, mid-array, and basal array) correlations for EABR and ESRT thresholds versus M-levels were calculated over time. These were used to derive predictive formulae by linear and multiple regression analysis. Such statistically predicted M-levels were compared with the behaviourally recorded M-levels among the cohort, using Cronbach's alpha reliability test method for confirming the efficacy of this method. Results NRI, ESRT, and EABR thresholds showed statistically significant positive correlations with behavioural M-levels, which improved with implant use over time. These correlations were used to derive predicted M-levels using regression analysis. On an average, predicted M-levels were found to be statistically reliable and they were a fair match to the actual behavioural M-levels. When applied in clinical practice, the predicted values were found to be useful for programming members of the study group. However, individuals showed considerable deviations in behavioural M-levels, above and below the electrophysiologically predicted values, due to various factors. While the current method appears helpful as a reference to predict initial maps in 'difficult to Map' subjects, it is recommended that behavioural measures are mandatory to further optimize the maps for these individuals. Conclusion The study explores the trends, correlations and individual variabilities that occur between electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses, recorded over time among a cohort of cochlear implantees. The statistical method shown may be used as a guideline to predict optimal behavioural levels in difficult situations among future implantees, bearing in mind that optimal M-levels for individuals can vary from predicted values. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, following a protocol of sequential behavioural programming, in conjunction with electrophysiological correlates will provide the best outcomes. Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Percept (MAP) and appropriate MAP becomes the key issue in the habilitation program. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, objective measures become paramount to predict optimal current levels to be set in the MAP. We aimed to (a) study the trends in multi-modal electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses sequentially over the first year of implant use; (b) generate normative data from the above; (c) correlate the multi-modal electrophysiological thresholds levels with behavioural comfort levels; and (d) create predictive formulae for deriving optimal comfort levels (if unknown), using linear and multiple regression analysis.OBJECTIVESIndications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant based on behavioural responses may be tedious for audiologists in such cases, wherein matching an effective Measurable Auditory Percept (MAP) and appropriate MAP becomes the key issue in the habilitation program. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, objective measures become paramount to predict optimal current levels to be set in the MAP. We aimed to (a) study the trends in multi-modal electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses sequentially over the first year of implant use; (b) generate normative data from the above; (c) correlate the multi-modal electrophysiological thresholds levels with behavioural comfort levels; and (d) create predictive formulae for deriving optimal comfort levels (if unknown), using linear and multiple regression analysis.This prospective study included 10 profoundly hearing impaired children aged between 2 and 7 years with normal inner ear anatomy and no additional handicaps. They received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90 K Implant with Harmony Speech processor and used HiRes-P with Fidelity 120 strategy. They underwent, impedance telemetry, neural response imaging, electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry (ESRT), and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) tests at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of implant use, in conjunction with behavioural mapping. Trends in electrophysiological and behavioural responses were analyzed using paired t-test. By Karl Pearson's correlation method, electrode-wise correlations were derived for neural response imaging (NRI) thresholds versus most comfortable level (M-levels) and offset based (apical, mid-array, and basal array) correlations for EABR and ESRT thresholds versus M-levels were calculated over time. These were used to derive predictive formulae by linear and multiple regression analysis. Such statistically predicted M-levels were compared with the behaviourally recorded M-levels among the cohort, using Cronbach's alpha reliability test method for confirming the efficacy of this method.METHODSThis prospective study included 10 profoundly hearing impaired children aged between 2 and 7 years with normal inner ear anatomy and no additional handicaps. They received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90 K Implant with Harmony Speech processor and used HiRes-P with Fidelity 120 strategy. They underwent, impedance telemetry, neural response imaging, electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry (ESRT), and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) tests at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of implant use, in conjunction with behavioural mapping. Trends in electrophysiological and behavioural responses were analyzed using paired t-test. By Karl Pearson's correlation method, electrode-wise correlations were derived for neural response imaging (NRI) thresholds versus most comfortable level (M-levels) and offset based (apical, mid-array, and basal array) correlations for EABR and ESRT thresholds versus M-levels were calculated over time. These were used to derive predictive formulae by linear and multiple regression analysis. Such statistically predicted M-levels were compared with the behaviourally recorded M-levels among the cohort, using Cronbach's alpha reliability test method for confirming the efficacy of this method.NRI, ESRT, and EABR thresholds showed statistically significant positive correlations with behavioural M-levels, which improved with implant use over time. These correlations were used to derive predicted M-levels using regression analysis. On an average, predicted M-levels were found to be statistically reliable and they were a fair match to the actual behavioural M-levels. When applied in clinical practice, the predicted values were found to be useful for programming members of the study group. However, individuals showed considerable deviations in behavioural M-levels, above and below the electrophysiologically predicted values, due to various factors. While the current method appears helpful as a reference to predict initial maps in 'difficult to Map' subjects, it is recommended that behavioural measures are mandatory to further optimize the maps for these individuals.RESULTSNRI, ESRT, and EABR thresholds showed statistically significant positive correlations with behavioural M-levels, which improved with implant use over time. These correlations were used to derive predicted M-levels using regression analysis. On an average, predicted M-levels were found to be statistically reliable and they were a fair match to the actual behavioural M-levels. When applied in clinical practice, the predicted values were found to be useful for programming members of the study group. However, individuals showed considerable deviations in behavioural M-levels, above and below the electrophysiologically predicted values, due to various factors. While the current method appears helpful as a reference to predict initial maps in 'difficult to Map' subjects, it is recommended that behavioural measures are mandatory to further optimize the maps for these individuals.The study explores the trends, correlations and individual variabilities that occur between electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses, recorded over time among a cohort of cochlear implantees. The statistical method shown may be used as a guideline to predict optimal behavioural levels in difficult situations among future implantees, bearing in mind that optimal M-levels for individuals can vary from predicted values. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, following a protocol of sequential behavioural programming, in conjunction with electrophysiological correlates will provide the best outcomes.CONCLUSIONThe study explores the trends, correlations and individual variabilities that occur between electrophysiological tests and behavioural responses, recorded over time among a cohort of cochlear implantees. The statistical method shown may be used as a guideline to predict optimal behavioural levels in difficult situations among future implantees, bearing in mind that optimal M-levels for individuals can vary from predicted values. In 'Difficult to MAP' scenarios, following a protocol of sequential behavioural programming, in conjunction with electrophysiological correlates will provide the best outcomes. |
| Author | Raghunandhan, S Kameswaran, Mohan Ranjith, R Ravikumar, A Mandke, Kalyani |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S surname: Raghunandhan fullname: Raghunandhan, S email: raghunandhansampath@gmail.com organization: Consultant ENT SurgeonsMadras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai – sequence: 2 givenname: A surname: Ravikumar fullname: Ravikumar, A organization: Department of ENT and H & N Surgery, Sri Ramachandra University – sequence: 3 givenname: Mohan surname: Kameswaran fullname: Kameswaran, Mohan organization: Consultant ENT SurgeonsMadras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai – sequence: 4 givenname: Kalyani surname: Mandke fullname: Mandke, Kalyani organization: Mandke Hearing ServicesPune – sequence: 5 givenname: R surname: Ranjith fullname: Ranjith, R organization: MERF- Institute of Speech & HearingChennai |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24606544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkctOHDEQRa2IKDx_AfWSTYNfY7clNiMUSCQkNrDIynLb5Ywjd3tiu4nm7-lhBgWxwZuyfO4tl-oeo4MxjYDQOcGXhEh1ReSCS0E7wn9d4v0R_As62oJ2Sw7mOxeyxQTjQ3Rcyh-MGeEL_g0dUi6wWHB-hFbLxsYwBmtiU-rkNk3yDUSwNaf1alNCiun3K7UpZ4imQtlKeliZ55Cm_EoGn3JtIjxDLE0Y5xe7imByE4Z1NGMFKKfoqzexwNm-nqCn2--PNz_a-4e7nzfL-9bSjtfWG8U7ZT0TPbMCnOqVxFICc8xjx61yFjz01FGrvJoJcVZISrvOY-E7yU7Qxa7vOqe_E5Sqh1AsxHkMSFPRZMEwo5hiNUvP99KpH8DpdQ6DyRv9tp1ZcL0T2JxKyeC1DdXUkMaaTYiaYL0NQ78LQ_8PY7aLD_a3Hz41LnfGMM6LHcy_lKPT1Wxiyj6b0Yai2Sc9XgBJwKKh |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijporl_2017_08_026 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_020_00844_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_14992027_2021_2015543 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0272943 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_024_08890_9 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022215124000227 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022215116009026 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000000495 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00106_024_01509_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_025_09532_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_14992027_2017_1370139 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165211031751 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/mao.0b013e3180577919 10.1159/000066154 10.1097/00003446-199404000-00008 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.011 10.1097/01.aud.0000146178.84065.b3 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00004 10.1080/00016480510026890 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00013 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00001 10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00426-8 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2014 2014 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2014 2014 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000064 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1754-7628 |
| EndPage | 160 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 24606544 10_1179_1754762814Y_0000000064 11694208 |
| Genre | Research Article Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 002 0R~ 1OC 1~B 36B 4.4 53G 5GY 6PF AAGDL AALUX AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABBKH ABDBF ABEIZ ABIJN ABIVO ABLIJ ABUPF ABWVI ABXYU ACENM ACIEZ ACUHS ADCVX AECIN AFRVT AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AIJEM AIRBT AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALYBC AMDAE ARJSQ BLEHA BOHLJ CCCUG CS3 E01 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN ESX F5P H13 HCLVR HZ~ KYCEM LAW M4Z OIG P2P P76 P7A P7B QRW RNANH RVRKI RYL SV3 TASJS TBQAZ TERGH TFL TFW TUROJ TUS UEQFS XV2 29F 31~ 8-1 AAJKZ AAYXX ACKZS ACOPL ACXQS ACYZI ADFOM ADFZZ AEIIZ AFBPY AJAOE CITATION CZDIS DRXRE DWTOO IPNFZ LJTGL M46 RIG ADYSH CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-fa9489cf36b3c6ed9b97077e3d3f0d4c9dcefeb2d2c9f90771dc672288f06f873 |
| IEDL.DBID | TFW |
| ISSN | 1467-0100 1754-7628 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 18:44:16 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:52 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:59:19 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:56:57 EST 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:46:51 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | measurable auditory percept electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry Cochlear implant Impedance telemetry most comfortable level neural response imaging Evoked compound action potential electrically evoked auditory brainstem response Clinical unit |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c284t-fa9489cf36b3c6ed9b97077e3d3f0d4c9dcefeb2d2c9f90771dc672288f06f873 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 24606544 |
| PQID | 1530320209 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1530320209 crossref_citationtrail_10_1179_1754762814Y_0000000064 pubmed_primary_24606544 crossref_primary_10_1179_1754762814Y_0000000064 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1179_1754762814Y_0000000064 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2014-May |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2014 text: 2014-May |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Cochlear implants international |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Cochlear Implants Int |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis |
| References | CIT0001 Shallop J.K. (CIT0011) 1995; 166 CIT0012 Di Nardo W. (CIT0006) 2003; 23 Mason S. (CIT0010) 2004; 43 Hodges A.V. (CIT0009) 2003 CIT0003 CIT0014 CIT0002 CIT0013 CIT0005 CIT0004 CIT0015 CIT0007 CIT0008 |
| References_xml | – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3180577919 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1159/000066154 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1097/00003446-199404000-00008 – volume: 23 start-page: 352 year: 2003 ident: CIT0006 publication-title: Acta Otolaryngol Italica – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009 – start-page: S81 volume-title: Cochlear Implants - Objective Measures year: 2003 ident: CIT0009 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.011 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000146178.84065.b3 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00004 – volume: 43 start-page: S33 year: 2004 ident: CIT0010 publication-title: International Journal of Audiology – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1080/00016480510026890 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00013 – volume: 166 start-page: 175 year: 1995 ident: CIT0011 publication-title: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology Supplement – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00001 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00426-8 |
| SSID | ssj0031454 |
| Score | 1.9792236 |
| Snippet | Objectives
Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming... Indications for cochlear implantation have expanded today to include very young children and those with syndromes/multiple handicaps. Programming the implant... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 145 |
| SubjectTerms | Auditory Threshold - physiology Behavior Child Child, Preschool Clinical unit Cochlear implant Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Deafness - physiopathology Deafness - therapy electrically evoked auditory brainstem response electrically evoked stapedial response telemetry Electrophysiological Phenomena Evoked compound action potential Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem Female Humans Impedance telemetry Male measurable auditory percept most comfortable level neural response imaging Prospective Studies Telemetry |
| Title | A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees |
| URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000064 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24606544 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1530320209 |
| Volume | 15 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis customDbUrl: eissn: 1754-7628 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0031454 issn: 1467-0100 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 20000301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LT8IwGG-UGOPF9wMfpCZeF8Za19YbMRIPygkjnpauj0ACg8Dw7_drtyEcCAe9buu29uv3-LX9vh9CD4IYHlNDgzDlAFDACQRSKB0AdiY2JSpl2kv6jXW7vN8Xq7kw7lilw9C2KBThbbVTbpmWDCRMNMHjUdBh3qJfRflB71jBDIPvd7rZ63xWxpi0qCdC8_YAoEdYJglvfs2af1qrXro5BvW-qHP0H704RodlJIrbxdQ5QTsmO0X77-Ve-xkatHGVNol9EVo8sbhkzfHrIZXZxMoxfIxc0OoeKRP_XTkPuDOGnuV45I4mzfEwgytq4Jgq8HA8HTmpmvk5-ui89J5fg5KXIVDgzPLASkG5UJbEIMzYaJEKFjJmiCY21FQJrYwFxK4jJSyAb9bSKmZRxLkNY8sZuUC1bJKZK4RDm2qICKVMAZcB-JIsNjxMI2qlalkZ19FjJY1ElUXLHXfGKPHghYlkZRiT32Gso-ay3bQo27G1xdOqsJPcL5jYgt0kIdsa31dTIwH1dHsuMjOTxTwBh-Ip6kNRR5fFnFn-UERjl9pLr__y6Rt0ADEcLc5g3qJaPluYO7SnvvPhfNZAu6zPG14lfgDACQXW |
| linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JTsMwEB2xCbiwL2U1EteINDaxzQ0hKhCl4lAEnKzEi6hUUkQD38_YSVgOiANckziJPZ5582zPDMChpFakzLIozgUSFASBKJPaRMidqcupzrkJku7yXk_c38ubCThrYmH8sUrPoV2VKCLYaq_cfjG60nAujxDyGCqxaLOHKv9gQNZJmD5GsPUJ9Pudu8Yc0zYLpdCCRUDyEddhwj-_5xtCfctf-rMXGtCos_gv_ViChdoZJafV7FmGCVuswOx1vd2-Co-npImcJCEPLRk5UhfOCUsijeUk2hf5GHq_1T9Sx_77jB545wm7VpKhP500JoMCr-hHX6yCDJ6eh16wdrwGt53z_tlFVJdmiDTiWRm5TDIhtaMpyjO1RuaSx5xbaqiLDdPSaOuQtJtES4f8m7eNTnmSCOHi1AlO12GqGBV2E0jscoNOYZblSM2Qf2U8tSLOE-Yy3XZZ2oLjRhxK13nLffmMoQr8hUv1ZRjV5zC24Oij3XOVuePXFidfpa3KsGbiqgIniv7W-KCZGwo11G-7ZIUdvY4VYkqoUh_LFmxUk-bjhxKW-uhetvWXT-_D3EX_uqu6l72rbZhHl45VRzJ3YKp8ebW7MKPfysH4ZS9oxjsn0wkY |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB5BQSsuPAqFhQKuxDXaJDZ-cKtoIxBl1cNWLCcr8UNdaZtdNSm_n7GTlN3Dqgd6TeIk9sx45rM98wF8UtRJzhxL0koiQEEnkJTK2ASxM_UVNZWwUdJnYjqV87nazIUJxyoDhvZdoYg4VwfjXlvfGbhQE_R4DG1YZux3V34wOtaH8AhjZx60fFb8GmZjmrHIhBYnBMQeaZ8lvPs9Ww5qq3zp7iA0OqPi2X104zk87UNRctzpzgt44Op9GP3sN9tfwuUxGfImSaxCS1ae9LQ5cUFkmDeJCRQfyxC1hkf6zP9QzwPvXGHPWrIMZ5MasqjxirkMVBVkcbVeBrG65hVcFKezr9-SnpghMejN2sSXikllPOUoTe6sqpRIhXDUUp9aZpQ1ziNkt7lRHtG3yKzhIs-l9Cn3UtAD2KtXtXsDJPWVxZCwLCsEZoi-SsGdTKuc-dJkvuRj-DxIQ5u-ankgz1jqiF6E0hvDqP8N4xgmt-3WXd2OO1t82RS2buOKie_oTTS9q_HRoBoa7TNsupS1W900Gj1K5KhP1Rhedzpz-0M54yG3l739n09_hNH5SaHPvk9_vIMnGM-x7jzmIey11zfuPTw2f9pFc_0h2sVf-wMHyg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+clinical+study+of+electrophysiological+correlates+of+behavioural+comfort+levels+in+cochlear+implantees&rft.jtitle=Cochlear+implants+international&rft.au=Raghunandhan%2C+S&rft.au=Ravikumar%2C+A&rft.au=Kameswaran%2C+Mohan&rft.au=Mandke%2C+Kalyani&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=1467-0100&rft.eissn=1754-7628&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=160&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179%2F1754762814Y.0000000064&rft.externalDocID=11694208 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1467-0100&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1467-0100&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1467-0100&client=summon |