Sarcopenia and vertebral fracture

We read with interest the article by Iida and colleagues looking at sarcopenia in patients with vertebral fractures [1]. Both these conditions are important issues, especially in Asia. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are not uncommon in the elderly and are under recognised [2]. A recent review arti...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Ročník 4; číslo 4; s. 151
Hlavní autori: Hew, Fen Lee, Chan, Siew Pheng, Yeap, Swan Sim
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2018
Korean Society of Osteoporosis
대한골다공증학회
Predmet:
ISSN:2405-5255, 2405-5263, 2405-5263
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract We read with interest the article by Iida and colleagues looking at sarcopenia in patients with vertebral fractures [1]. Both these conditions are important issues, especially in Asia. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are not uncommon in the elderly and are under recognised [2]. A recent review article on vertebral fracture found that the age-standardised incidence was highest in South Korea, followed by USA and Hong Kong, e.g., for women, the rates were 1377, 939, and 662 per 100,000 respectively, i.e., 2 of the top 3 countries with a high incidence of vertebral fractures are in Asia [3]. For sarcopenia, the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia estimated that between 4.1% and 11.5% of the over 65 year old age group would have sarcopenia [4]. Thus, rehabilitation after an osteoporotic fracture should obviously be seen as a musculoskeletal problem rather than just a skeletal problem. This study has highlighted several important issues that would have clinical implications. Sarcopenia assessment premorbid/ prior to, and at presentation, of a fracture is not universally comprehensive with a few exceptions. The fact that this study demonstrated the prognostic role of such assessment is important given the much poorer outcome in terms of ability to return home 1 year after the fracture. Healthcare resources could be directed to those at higher risk to improve outcomes. However, we have several queries and comments: The authors have defined sarcopenia based only on densitometric criteria i.e., muscle mass, rather than the suggested combination of muscle function and muscle mass. Although the authors stated that they could not evaluate walking speed in the patients following a fracture, could the patients have had their grip strength assessed? We are not clear as to why the subjects were divided into “Osteoporosis” and “Without osteoporosis” groups. Since if they have had “osteoporotic vertebral fractures,” shouldn’t they all be osteoporotic? There were 396 study subjects, but only “about” 336 subjects had a 1-year follow-up. Could the authors be more specific as to exactly how many patients had a 1-year follow-up? In addition, can they provide information on those who were not followed up? If the patients who dropped out were significantly different in any of the characteristics, then the conclusion of the study would be less robust. This study only looked at patients hospitalised for their vertebral fracture, presumably consecutive admissions without selection. Were there patients who did not require hospitalization? And were they studied in a similar manner? Almost all the male elderly subjects in this cohort have sarcopenia e 102 out of 111. Do the authors have any comments as to why this is so? Many studies, though not all, have shown higher rates of sarcopenia in men compared to women [4], but never by this much especially when there is no difference in the age between the genders. Or does this reflect the social background of men being less likely to be involved socially and thus less active which may have contributed to the higher rate of sarcopenia? We know that earlier and adequate pain control improves mobility and reduces bone loss. The inclusion criteria include subjects within a month of onset of symptoms. We do know that a month of inactivity can cause quite substantial skeletal muscle loss. Do the authors have data to look at the time of presentation fromonset of symptoms to see if this has any bearing on sarcopenia? As indicated by the authors, vitamin D (in particular) and bisphosphonate treatment may improve outcome, was there data to indicate the rate of treatment in this cohort? Table 3 is titled “Comparison between patients with and without osteoporosis,” but yet the table headings are “sarcopenia” and “without sarcopenia.” Is there a typographical error? KCI Citation Count: 0
AbstractList We read with interest the article by Iida and colleagues looking at sarcopenia in patients with vertebral fractures [1]. Both these conditions are important issues, especially in Asia. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are not uncommon in the elderly and are under recognised [2]. A recent review article on vertebral fracture found that the age-standardised incidence was highest in South Korea, followed by USA and Hong Kong, e.g., for women, the rates were 1377, 939, and 662 per 100,000 respectively, i.e., 2 of the top 3 countries with a high incidence of vertebral fractures are in Asia [3]. For sarcopenia, the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia estimated that between 4.1% and 11.5% of the over 65 year old age group would have sarcopenia [4]. Thus, rehabilitation after an osteoporotic fracture should obviously be seen as a musculoskeletal problem rather than just a skeletal problem. This study has highlighted several important issues that would have clinical implications. Sarcopenia assessment premorbid/ prior to, and at presentation, of a fracture is not universally comprehensive with a few exceptions. The fact that this study demonstrated the prognostic role of such assessment is important given the much poorer outcome in terms of ability to return home 1 year after the fracture. Healthcare resources could be directed to those at higher risk to improve outcomes. However, we have several queries and comments: The authors have defined sarcopenia based only on densitometric criteria i.e., muscle mass, rather than the suggested combination of muscle function and muscle mass. Although the authors stated that they could not evaluate walking speed in the patients following a fracture, could the patients have had their grip strength assessed? We are not clear as to why the subjects were divided into “Osteoporosis” and “Without osteoporosis” groups. Since if they have had “osteoporotic vertebral fractures,” shouldn’t they all be osteoporotic? There were 396 study subjects, but only “about” 336 subjects had a 1-year follow-up. Could the authors be more specific as to exactly how many patients had a 1-year follow-up? In addition, can they provide information on those who were not followed up? If the patients who dropped out were significantly different in any of the characteristics, then the conclusion of the study would be less robust. This study only looked at patients hospitalised for their vertebral fracture, presumably consecutive admissions without selection. Were there patients who did not require hospitalization? And were they studied in a similar manner? Almost all the male elderly subjects in this cohort have sarcopenia e 102 out of 111. Do the authors have any comments as to why this is so? Many studies, though not all, have shown higher rates of sarcopenia in men compared to women [4], but never by this much especially when there is no difference in the age between the genders. Or does this reflect the social background of men being less likely to be involved socially and thus less active which may have contributed to the higher rate of sarcopenia? We know that earlier and adequate pain control improves mobility and reduces bone loss. The inclusion criteria include subjects within a month of onset of symptoms. We do know that a month of inactivity can cause quite substantial skeletal muscle loss. Do the authors have data to look at the time of presentation fromonset of symptoms to see if this has any bearing on sarcopenia? As indicated by the authors, vitamin D (in particular) and bisphosphonate treatment may improve outcome, was there data to indicate the rate of treatment in this cohort? Table 3 is titled “Comparison between patients with and without osteoporosis,” but yet the table headings are “sarcopenia” and “without sarcopenia.” Is there a typographical error? KCI Citation Count: 0
Author Chan, Siew Pheng
Hew, Fen Lee
Yeap, Swan Sim
AuthorAffiliation Department of Medicine, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Medicine, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Fen Lee
  surname: Hew
  fullname: Hew, Fen Lee
  email: hewfenlee@yahoo.co.uk
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Siew Pheng
  surname: Chan
  fullname: Chan, Siew Pheng
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Swan Sim
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0474-3667
  surname: Yeap
  fullname: Yeap, Swan Sim
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002427173$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp9UctuUzEQtVArWkp_gAUKO1jkdvy6dlhUqipaKlWqBGU9sn1tcHNjBzuJ1L_HaUoEm65mpDmP0TlvyEHKyRPyjkJHgfZnD50JuXYMqO4o7UD3r8gxEyCnkvX8YL9LeUROa40WhFBSMtW_JkccVNt7OCYfvpvi8tKnaCYmDZONLytvixknoRi3Whf_lhwGM1Z_-jxPyI-rL_eXX6e3d9c3lxe3U8c076cKtAoA0gcJVjsrFIVBMNdMnVKDEMHamQ3tTzmj1HJlqJk56R1jwlkn-Qn5tNNNJeDcRcwmPs2fGecFL77d3yCfSaWhb9jzHXa5tgs_OJ9W7WVclrgw5fGJ-f8lxV9NZ4M9V0xT3gQ-PguU_Hvt6woXsTo_jib5vK7IqOZUSxDQoO__9dqb_M2wAdgO4Equtfiwh1DAbVf4gNuucNsVUootg0b6vCP5Fukm-oJujCk6M879Iw45vkT-Ay5Fme0
Cites_doi 10.1007/s001980070078
10.1007/s00198-017-3909-3
10.1016/j.afos.2018.09.002
10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.016
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis
2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. 2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis
– notice: 2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. 2018 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2405-5263
EndPage 151
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3957806
PMC6372813
30775560
10_1016_j_afos_2018_11_086
S2405525518300955
Genre Editorial
Commentary
GroupedDBID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
M~E
AAYXX
CITATION
.1-
.FO
0R~
0SF
457
5VS
6I.
AACTN
AAEDW
AAFTH
AALRI
AAXUO
ABMAC
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADVLN
AEXQZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGHFR
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
AMRAJ
AOIJS
BCNDV
EBS
EJD
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IPNFZ
KQ8
NCXOZ
NPM
O9-
OK1
RIG
ROL
RPM
SSZ
Z5R
7X8
AAYWO
ACVFH
ADCNI
AEUPX
AFPUW
AIGII
AKBMS
AKYEP
5PM
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-7087f005ef50b8cb4710d42c475c77d44fbb9bf0865911b37a1a9c5ec224cbc53
ISSN 2405-5255
2405-5263
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:33:08 EST 2023
Tue Nov 04 01:55:45 EST 2025
Fri Jul 11 12:03:05 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:01:01 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:00:25 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 18:47:44 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2836-7087f005ef50b8cb4710d42c475c77d44fbb9bf0865911b37a1a9c5ec224cbc53
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ORCID 0000-0002-0474-3667
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086
PMID 30775560
PQID 2183185040
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3957806
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6372813
proquest_miscellaneous_2183185040
pubmed_primary_30775560
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2018_11_086
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_afos_2018_11_086
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2018
2018-12-00
2018-Dec
20181201
2018-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2018
  text: December 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
PublicationTitleAlternate Osteoporos Sarcopenia
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Korean Society of Osteoporosis
대한골다공증학회
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Korean Society of Osteoporosis
– name: 대한골다공증학회
References Iida, Sakai, Watanabe, Matsui, Takemura, Matsui (bib1) 2018; 4
Ballane, Cauley, Luckey, El-Hajj Fuleihan (bib3) 2017; 28
Gehlbach, Bigelow, Heimisdottir, May, Walker, Kirkwood (bib2) 2000; 11
Chen, Lee, Peng, Liu, Arai, Akishita (bib4) 2016; 17
Gehlbach (10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib2) 2000; 11
Ballane (10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib3) 2017; 28
Iida (10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib1) 2018; 4
Chen (10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib4) 2016; 17
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 767.e1-7
  year: 2016
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Recent advances in sarcopenia research in Asia: 2016 update from the Asian working group for sarcopenia
  publication-title: J Am Med Dir Assoc
– volume: 11
  start-page: 577
  year: 2000
  end-page: 582
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1531
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1542
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
– volume: 4
  start-page: 114
  year: 2018
  end-page: 117
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Sarcopenia affects conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture
  publication-title: Osteoporos Sarcopenia
– volume: 11
  start-page: 577
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib2
  article-title: Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s001980070078
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1531
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib3
  article-title: Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3909-3
– volume: 4
  start-page: 114
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib1
  article-title: Sarcopenia affects conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture
  publication-title: Osteoporos Sarcopenia
  doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.09.002
– volume: 17
  start-page: 767.e1-7
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.086_bib4
  article-title: Recent advances in sarcopenia research in Asia: 2016 update from the Asian working group for sarcopenia
  publication-title: J Am Med Dir Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.016
SSID ssib044755276
ssj0001562622
Score 2.0487344
Snippet We read with interest the article by Iida and colleagues looking at sarcopenia in patients with vertebral fractures [1]. Both these conditions are important...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 151
SubjectTerms 정형외과학
Title Sarcopenia and vertebral fracture
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S2405525518300955
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775560
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2183185040
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6372813
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002427173
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia, 2018, 4(4), 14, pp.151-151
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2405-5263
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001562622
  issn: 2405-5255
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2405-5263
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssib044755276
  issn: 2405-5255
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NT9swFLdWNiEuE_suYyhMu1VBsZ3E9nGaQEwaDAkm9WbFrj0KI6kKDE772_fs2GnoxrQddnGrxLFj_5z3Zb_3EHo3YRYroUWqKlqlOZlkqaKGpV52LYRxXNcnm2CHh3w8FkchLfulTyfA6prf3orZf4UargHYznX2H-DuGoUL8B9AhxJgh_KvgD-G8bicWK231cjlW3abw99G1jlEhQAiUR79DCA3III3Li6Jt6F3Ty-spH73B8Y4-mS6ZeC8Erzl1Dm-HJ2awAC99bXyOe-ObxzpmF707QqY985oGE9_gNcXoKcG-hOIZd5bE3mP8OE2bOwvBLm1DZztVLZxwdEx3_ExU8t-ZZi_2YVHg7qAfEWbYGApDHa8NUAPCSwi0dOeg0M4KQkJblHtCb7lPtfQamzlPilkUM_t73SN5SOzPRnkZB09DspD8r4F_Ql6YOqnaPUgHI94hrYX2CcAZtJhn0Tsn6Mve7snH_bTkAMj1SD4lSnLOLNAKY0tMsW1Alkim-REw4ekGZvkuVVKKAujK4BtKcoqXAldGA2imVa6oC_QSt3U5hVKykwwA9o3thznKseCU4qJzVSmLMkZGaJRnBM5a0OdyHgG8Ey6yZRuMkFnlNDdENE4bTI68QLbkQD8H596CzMsz_VUurjm7vdrI8_nErS3j9LtGfMMKm1HACQQO7eDVdWmuYaWgAGBgAmMZ4hetoB0rxqhHSJ2B6quguvw7p16euoDqpeUEY7pxr1tvkZri09kE61cza_NG_RIf7-aXs630ICN-ZZfj1Ae_Nj9CTnwigU
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sarcopenia+and+vertebral+fracture&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis+and+sarcopenia&rft.au=Hew%2C+Fen+Lee&rft.au=Chan%2C+Siew+Pheng&rft.au=Yeap%2C+Swan+Sim&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.eissn=2405-5263&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=151&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.afos.2018.11.086&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30775560&rft.externalDocID=30775560
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2405-5255&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2405-5255&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2405-5255&client=summon