Outcomes for Physiologic Microsurgical Treatment of Secondary Lymphedema Involving the Extremity

The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL). VLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucit...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Annals of surgery Ročník 276; číslo 4; s. e255
Hlavní autoři: Beederman, Maureen, Garza, Rebecca M, Agarwal, Shailesh, Chang, David W
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.10.2022
Témata:
ISSN:1528-1140, 1528-1140
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL). VLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on patient outcomes after use of these techniques to treat lymphedema. An analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment of secondary lymphedema over a 5.5-year period was performed. Patient demographics, surgical details, subjective reported improvements, LLIS scores, and postoperative limb volume calculations were analyzed. Two hundred seventy-four patients with secondary lymphedema (197 upper, 77 lower) were included in the study. More than 87% of UEL patients and 60% of LEL patients had reduction in excess limb volume postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients with UEL had a 31.1% reduction in volume difference between limbs, 33.9% at 6 months, 25.7% at 12 months, 47.4% at 24 months and 47.7% at 4 years. The reduction in limb volume difference followed a similar pattern but was overall lower for LEL patients. Greater than 86% of UEL and 75% of LEL patients also had improvement in LLIS scores postoperatively. Fifty-nine complications occurred (12.9%); flap survival was >99%. Patients with secondary UEL/LEL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes postoperatively. Patients with UEL seem to have a more substantial reduction in limb volume differential compared to LEL patients.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL).OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL).VLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on patient outcomes after use of these techniques to treat lymphedema.SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATAVLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on patient outcomes after use of these techniques to treat lymphedema.An analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment of secondary lymphedema over a 5.5-year period was performed. Patient demographics, surgical details, subjective reported improvements, LLIS scores, and postoperative limb volume calculations were analyzed.METHODSAn analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment of secondary lymphedema over a 5.5-year period was performed. Patient demographics, surgical details, subjective reported improvements, LLIS scores, and postoperative limb volume calculations were analyzed.Two hundred seventy-four patients with secondary lymphedema (197 upper, 77 lower) were included in the study. More than 87% of UEL patients and 60% of LEL patients had reduction in excess limb volume postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients with UEL had a 31.1% reduction in volume difference between limbs, 33.9% at 6 months, 25.7% at 12 months, 47.4% at 24 months and 47.7% at 4 years. The reduction in limb volume difference followed a similar pattern but was overall lower for LEL patients. Greater than 86% of UEL and 75% of LEL patients also had improvement in LLIS scores postoperatively. Fifty-nine complications occurred (12.9%); flap survival was >99%.RESULTSTwo hundred seventy-four patients with secondary lymphedema (197 upper, 77 lower) were included in the study. More than 87% of UEL patients and 60% of LEL patients had reduction in excess limb volume postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients with UEL had a 31.1% reduction in volume difference between limbs, 33.9% at 6 months, 25.7% at 12 months, 47.4% at 24 months and 47.7% at 4 years. The reduction in limb volume difference followed a similar pattern but was overall lower for LEL patients. Greater than 86% of UEL and 75% of LEL patients also had improvement in LLIS scores postoperatively. Fifty-nine complications occurred (12.9%); flap survival was >99%.Patients with secondary UEL/LEL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes postoperatively. Patients with UEL seem to have a more substantial reduction in limb volume differential compared to LEL patients.CONCLUSIONSPatients with secondary UEL/LEL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes postoperatively. Patients with UEL seem to have a more substantial reduction in limb volume differential compared to LEL patients.
The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL). VLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on patient outcomes after use of these techniques to treat lymphedema. An analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment of secondary lymphedema over a 5.5-year period was performed. Patient demographics, surgical details, subjective reported improvements, LLIS scores, and postoperative limb volume calculations were analyzed. Two hundred seventy-four patients with secondary lymphedema (197 upper, 77 lower) were included in the study. More than 87% of UEL patients and 60% of LEL patients had reduction in excess limb volume postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients with UEL had a 31.1% reduction in volume difference between limbs, 33.9% at 6 months, 25.7% at 12 months, 47.4% at 24 months and 47.7% at 4 years. The reduction in limb volume difference followed a similar pattern but was overall lower for LEL patients. Greater than 86% of UEL and 75% of LEL patients also had improvement in LLIS scores postoperatively. Fifty-nine complications occurred (12.9%); flap survival was >99%. Patients with secondary UEL/LEL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes postoperatively. Patients with UEL seem to have a more substantial reduction in limb volume differential compared to LEL patients.
Author Agarwal, Shailesh
Beederman, Maureen
Garza, Rebecca M
Chang, David W
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Maureen
  surname: Beederman
  fullname: Beederman, Maureen
  organization: Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rebecca M
  surname: Garza
  fullname: Garza, Rebecca M
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Shailesh
  surname: Agarwal
  fullname: Agarwal, Shailesh
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David W
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, David W
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUF9LwzAcDDJxf_QbiOTRl84kTZv0cYypg8qEzeeaJr9ulaaZTTvst7fghN3L3cFxcDdFo9rVgNA9JXNKEvG0TRdzcgHOI3GFJjRiMqCUk9GFHqOp91-EUC6JuEHjkEmZSBFN0Oema7Wz4HHhGvx-6H3pKrcvNX4rdeN81wxaVXjXgGot1C12Bd6CdrVRTY_T3h4PYMAqvK5PrjqV9R63B8Crn7YBW7b9LbouVOXh7swz9PG82i1fg3Tzsl4u0kAzyeKAycQIlpNwsEbSWBIQeaxDliujFBMR0WFilIwjapQoQCdCFpoXPCmAKKHZDD3-9R4b992BbzNbeg1VpWpwnc8Y54THyTB7iD6co11uwWTHprTDmOz_FfYLdP5ogw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000010591
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09348_y
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_09920_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13143584
crossref_primary_10_3390_lymphatics1020013
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina61081327
crossref_primary_10_1089_lrb_2020_0098
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000011675
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005591
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11547_021_01410_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000210
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000006860
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2023_08_015
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13071540
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000010965
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfma_2024_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000011745
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2257_5345
crossref_primary_10_1089_lrb_2021_0051
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59071194
crossref_primary_10_1002_micr_30878
crossref_primary_10_1002_micr_30844
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2025_06_038
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000009761
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004457
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1528-1140
ExternalDocumentID 32889875
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1J1
23M
354
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABPPZ
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADGGA
ADHPY
AE6
AEBDS
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFCHL
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHJKT
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BOYCO
BQLVK
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IH2
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
J5H
JF7
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
OCB
ODMTH
OGEVE
OHH
OHYEH
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
RIG
RLZ
RPM
RXW
S4R
S4S
TAF
TEORI
TSPGW
UQX
V2I
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZFV
ZY1
~H1
7X8
ACBKD
ADKSD
ADSXY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2826-289d72b03c28d81680e7b6c32badaa2750c39da8651da7fec978fc4f49fe0a7c2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 39
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=00000658-202210000-00026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1528-1140
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 14:30:26 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:33:52 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2826-289d72b03c28d81680e7b6c32badaa2750c39da8651da7fec978fc4f49fe0a7c2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 32889875
PQID 2440469898
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2440469898
pubmed_primary_32889875
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-10-01
20221001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Annals of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssj0014807
Score 2.5564106
Snippet The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e255
SubjectTerms Humans
Lower Extremity - surgery
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphedema - etiology
Lymphedema - surgery
Microsurgery
Surgical Flaps - surgery
Upper Extremity
Title Outcomes for Physiologic Microsurgical Treatment of Secondary Lymphedema Involving the Extremity
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889875
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2440469898
Volume 276
WOSCitedRecordID wos00000658-202210000-00026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB7UevDiglvdGMFraJqZzGROUqRFoa2FVugtTmYBD01q0or9977JQk-CYA6BBBLCy8w331vmfQg9hFxHWliYSAlAIE2ckHtCmCeoCm0gtAiJLcUm-HgczediUgfcirqsssHEEqh1plyMvBO4Rnal2uHj8tNzqlEuu1pLaOyiFgEq40q6-HybRai3S8MSBZ4SeBLN1jnBO9Nhr2pdWB-Uhvx3klkuNoOj_37mMTqsaSbuVePiBO2Y9BS9v65X8BZTYGCquKz9rKAPj1xZXrHOSxjEs6b4HGcWT53HrGW-wcMN_HmjzULilxRQzYUiMPBH3P9e5WYBdP4MvQ36s6dnr1ZY8BS4WswDb0vzIPEJXGqnwOEbnjBFgkRqKV3rd0WElhELu1pyaxT4nFZRS4U1vuQqOEd7aZaaS4QdcEhmuoRpRruWiyS0PtOGMd8CJ6FtdN8YLIYR7NISMjXZuoi3Jmuji8rq8bJqtRGTIIL7PLz6w9PX6CBwexPKSrsb1LIwf80t2ldfq48ivyuHBpzHk9EPn_XDrg
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes+for+Physiologic+Microsurgical+Treatment+of+Secondary+Lymphedema+Involving+the+Extremity&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgery&rft.au=Beederman%2C+Maureen&rft.au=Garza%2C+Rebecca+M&rft.au=Agarwal%2C+Shailesh&rft.au=Chang%2C+David+W&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.issn=1528-1140&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.volume=276&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e255&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSLA.0000000000004457&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon