P35 The Effect of a Traffic Light Labeling Intervention on Amount of Food Served in a College Dining Hall

College students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user friendliness. To examine the effect of traffic light labels on the amount of food served in a university dining hall in comparison to the control nutri...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of nutrition education and behavior Ročník 53; číslo 7; s. S40
Hlavní autoři: Martin, Amy, Vollmer, Rachel L.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elsevier Inc 01.07.2021
Témata:
ISSN:1499-4046
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract College students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user friendliness. To examine the effect of traffic light labels on the amount of food served in a university dining hall in comparison to the control nutrition facts panels. This study utilized a repeated measures observational design with a control and an intervention period each lasting 28 days at a Midwestern midsize, private university. Following the control period (nutrition facts panels), each food was labeled with a single color (red, yellow, or green) based upon its nutritional quality. Number of servings per day by color (dependent variable) was combined for both lunch and dinner during the control and intervention period. To compare the amount served per day of each color during control and intervention, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Bonferroni post hoc tests were utilized for multiple comparisons. The one-way ANOVA for color and time point was significant (F (5, 150) = 4.75, P < 0.001). Yellow-labeled foods during the intervention (M = 341.89, SD = 275.86) was significantly lower than red-labeled foods during control (M = 654.56, SD = 286.40, P < 0.0001) and intervention (M = 604.91, SD = 295.84, P = 0.008). However, there were no other significant differences between colors and time points. These results suggest that traffic light labels may not be more effective than nutrition facts panels in college dining halls to improve food choices. Specifically, there was no significant difference in number of servings per day in red- and/or green-labeled foods between control and intervention. Furthermore, servings per day of red-labeled foods continued to be significantly greater than yellow-labeled foods during the intervention. Because students may not use nutrition labels to make food choices, college dining halls should consider reformulating recipes to improve healthfulness of options.
AbstractList College students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user friendliness. To examine the effect of traffic light labels on the amount of food served in a university dining hall in comparison to the control nutrition facts panels. This study utilized a repeated measures observational design with a control and an intervention period each lasting 28 days at a Midwestern midsize, private university. Following the control period (nutrition facts panels), each food was labeled with a single color (red, yellow, or green) based upon its nutritional quality. Number of servings per day by color (dependent variable) was combined for both lunch and dinner during the control and intervention period. To compare the amount served per day of each color during control and intervention, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Bonferroni post hoc tests were utilized for multiple comparisons. The one-way ANOVA for color and time point was significant (F (5, 150) = 4.75, P < 0.001). Yellow-labeled foods during the intervention (M = 341.89, SD = 275.86) was significantly lower than red-labeled foods during control (M = 654.56, SD = 286.40, P < 0.0001) and intervention (M = 604.91, SD = 295.84, P = 0.008). However, there were no other significant differences between colors and time points. These results suggest that traffic light labels may not be more effective than nutrition facts panels in college dining halls to improve food choices. Specifically, there was no significant difference in number of servings per day in red- and/or green-labeled foods between control and intervention. Furthermore, servings per day of red-labeled foods continued to be significantly greater than yellow-labeled foods during the intervention. Because students may not use nutrition labels to make food choices, college dining halls should consider reformulating recipes to improve healthfulness of options.
BackgroundCollege students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user friendliness. ObjectiveTo examine the effect of traffic light labels on the amount of food served in a university dining hall in comparison to the control nutrition facts panels. Study Design, Setting, ParticipantsThis study utilized a repeated measures observational design with a control and an intervention period each lasting 28 days at a Midwestern midsize, private university. Following the control period (nutrition facts panels), each food was labeled with a single color (red, yellow, or green) based upon its nutritional quality. Measurable Outcome/AnalysisNumber of servings per day by color (dependent variable) was combined for both lunch and dinner during the control and intervention period. To compare the amount served per day of each color during control and intervention, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Bonferroni post hoc tests were utilized for multiple comparisons. ResultsThe one-way ANOVA for color and time point was significant (F (5, 150) = 4.75, P < 0.001). Yellow-labeled foods during the intervention (M = 341.89, SD = 275.86) was significantly lower than red-labeled foods during control (M = 654.56, SD = 286.40, P < 0.0001) and intervention (M = 604.91, SD = 295.84, P = 0.008). However, there were no other significant differences between colors and time points. ConclusionThese results suggest that traffic light labels may not be more effective than nutrition facts panels in college dining halls to improve food choices. Specifically, there was no significant difference in number of servings per day in red- and/or green-labeled foods between control and intervention. Furthermore, servings per day of red-labeled foods continued to be significantly greater than yellow-labeled foods during the intervention. Because students may not use nutrition labels to make food choices, college dining halls should consider reformulating recipes to improve healthfulness of options.
College students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user friendliness. To examine the effect of traffic light labels on the amount of food served in a university dining hall in comparison to the control nutrition facts panels. This study utilized a repeated measures observational design with a control and an intervention period each lasting 28 days at a Midwestern midsize, private university. Following the control period (nutrition facts panels), each food was labeled with a single color (red, yellow, or green) based upon its nutritional quality. Number of servings per day by color (dependent variable) was combined for both lunch and dinner during the control and intervention period. To compare the amount served per day of each color during control and intervention, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Bonferroni post hoc tests were utilized for multiple comparisons. The one-way ANOVA for color and time point was significant (F (5, 150) = 4.75, P < 0.001). Yellow-labeled foods during the intervention (M = 341.89, SD = 275.86) was significantly lower than red-labeled foods during control (M = 654.56, SD = 286.40, P < 0.0001) and intervention (M = 604.91, SD = 295.84, P = 0.008). However, there were no other significant differences between colors and time points. These results suggest that traffic light labels may not be more effective than nutrition facts panels in college dining halls to improve food choices. Specifically, there was no significant difference in number of servings per day in red- and/or green-labeled foods between control and intervention. Furthermore, servings per day of red-labeled foods continued to be significantly greater than yellow-labeled foods during the intervention. Because students may not use nutrition labels to make food choices, college dining halls should consider reformulating recipes to improve healthfulness of options.
Author Martin, Amy
Vollmer, Rachel L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Amy
  surname: Martin
  fullname: Martin, Amy
  organization: Bradley University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rachel L.
  surname: Vollmer
  fullname: Vollmer, Rachel L.
  email: rvollmer@fsmail.bradley.edu
  organization: Bradley University, 1501 W. Bradley Ave, Peoria, IL, 61625
BookMark eNqFkc9rHCEUxz2k0CTtP9CTx152qq7jjCEEwja_YKGFbM-iznPjxNVEZwP57-N0cyq0BeEdfJ_v433eCTqKKQJCXyhpKKHi29iMEUzDCKMN4Q1n3RE6plzKBSdcfEQnpYyE0JYReYz8z2WLNw-Ar5wDO-HksMabrJ3zFq_99mHCa20g-LjFd3GC_AJx8ini-i53aR9_I9cpDfh-_hywjzVhlUKALeDvPs7krQ7hE_rgdCjw-b2eol_XV5vV7WL94-ZudbleWNbJbsEEXWpmtel754g0puXOCGF4awZYdhw4t4R3xnCQwjLRD51zVHDpBid61y9P0ddD7lNOz3sok9r5YiEEHSHti2JCECk72dLayg6tNqdSMjj1lP1O51dFiZpdqlHNLtXsUhGuqssKnR8gqEu8eMiqWA_RwuBzNaiG5P-NX_yB2yrXWx0e4RXKmPY5Vj2KqsIUUffz4ea7MUpI23JRA87-HvC_6W81Bqgj
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.04.427
DatabaseName CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
Anatomy & Physiology
Diet & Clinical Nutrition
EndPage S40
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_jneb_2021_04_427
S1499404621005546
1_s2_0_S1499404621005546
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-ET
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0-V
04C
0R~
186
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
29L
2QV
36B
3EH
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
7RV
7X2
85S
88E
88I
8A4
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FQ
8G5
8P~
A8Z
AABSN
AADFP
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAGJA
AAGUQ
AAHBH
AAIKC
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAMNW
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AATLK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABDBF
ABDPE
ABFRF
ABGRD
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABMZM
ABOYX
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACBNA
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIEU
ACJTP
ACLOT
ACNCT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACUHS
ACVFH
ACXNI
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADHUB
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADOJX
ADQTV
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXBA
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGLDT
AGNAY
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHMBA
AI.
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AIKWM
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
AOMHK
APXCP
ARALO
AVARZ
AXJTR
B0M
BCU
BEC
BKOJK
BKOMP
BLXMC
BMSDO
BNPGV
BVXVI
C45
CCPQU
COPKO
CS3
DU5
DXH
E.L
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
ECF
ECT
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EHN
EHX
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENB
ENC
ENX
EO9
EP2
EP3
ESTFP
ESX
EX3
F5P
FAFAN
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
H~9
IHE
J1W
KOM
L7B
M0P
M1P
M2M
M3G
M41
MO0
N9A
NAPCQ
NEJ
NHB
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OD~
OHT
OKEIE
OO0
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
PADUT
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PRBVW
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
Q38
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SJFOW
SNC
SND
SNG
SPCBC
SSA
SSB
SSH
SSO
SSY
SSZ
SV3
T5K
TEORI
TUS
TWZ
UBH
UHB
UKHRP
UKR
UNMZH
UPT
VH1
VQP
WH7
WOW
WQ9
XOL
XZL
YHZ
YQT
YRY
YZZ
Z5R
ZCA
ZCG
ZHY
~8M
~G-
~HD
~KM
9DU
AFFHD
AGCQF
PUEGO
AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2797-2613a2cab88ff09bb54fb66b45bde374e44c047bb4e96c268d7ff1649fdf68f83
ISSN 1499-4046
IngestDate Fri Nov 14 18:39:33 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:41:00 EST 2025
Sat Aug 30 17:14:30 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 12:11:23 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:26:17 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2797-2613a2cab88ff09bb54fb66b45bde374e44c047bb4e96c268d7ff1649fdf68f83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://www.jneb.org/article/S1499404621005546/pdf
PQID 2660997951
PQPubID 24069
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2660997951
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneb_2021_04_427
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jneb_2021_04_427
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1499404621005546
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jneb_2021_04_427
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20210701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2021
  text: 20210701
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of nutrition education and behavior
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
SSID ssj0015209
Score 2.277382
Snippet College students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user...
BackgroundCollege students may not use the nutrition facts label suggesting changes to the label, such as the Traffic Light Label, are needed to increase user...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage S40
SubjectTerms analysis of variance
behavior
color
dinner
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Internal Medicine
lunch
nutrition education
nutritive value
Title P35 The Effect of a Traffic Light Labeling Intervention on Amount of Food Served in a College Dining Hall
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1499404621005546
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1499404621005546
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.04.427
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2660997951
Volume 53
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  issn: 1499-4046
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20190401
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015209
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3da9swEBdZu4e9jC3dWLoPNBh7CQ62LFv2Y2hS2i2EsnYlb0KyZUhwnVKnpfuD9n_uZElO2i77goExsbBsJffL6e509xNCH6KUZKESsSczRjwqksyTJM-9QPoyy0VAVUP2fD5h02kym6Unnc53VwtzU7KqSm5v08v_KmpoA2Hr0tm_EHf7UGiAzyB0OIPY4fxHgj8JoyaPwvISN_WPMCNpqgjwwMEV70-ENFXox5sJj3AML_TOEbrLoSY71npEaW4meIILMIyaDSX6R6Ist9i1leP3t6ywLt_ZEQKsY-AtgcG6quIcXmP3c_miqabL_mRg4j4jEyuYboYpSNCmtDrNCq4VOKs23mhVr-EJthBjG3r01HA42SnZXj3Q9ibwsBgsKiUH-qWatZYaroG71Nrjg8-BV5OB753qgehxgK_r6xS9uzcbx4jXhPv8wa2P0C5hUQrKc3d4PJ59aperbC5R-x1tdZZJJLw_um0W0D1boDFwzp6hp1aCeGgQ9Rx1VNVFe8NKrJYX3_BH3OQKN4swXdQbzdUK2iyrbImnTuhdvQ-4FfsemgMYMYARGzDiZYEFtmDEDRixAyPeBCOGw4BRd9FgxAaMeF7BEywYsQEj1mB8gb4ejs8Ojjy7uYeXEZYyDzz3UJBMyCQpCj-VMqKFjGNJI5mrkFFFaeZTJiVVaZyROMlZUYBvnxZ5ESdFEr5EO9WyUq8QjkUkEyko0fR_UsWJDGjBfFAzSopYkB7qux-cXxoOF-6SGxdci4dr8XCfchBPD4VOJtxVJ8N8ygF0v-zFftZL1VYz1HwbqHooantaq9dYs79943sHGA5Tgl7nE5VaXtccbG5dDw--0_4_j-o1erL-F79BO6ura_UWPc5uVvP66p3F_w9C9Nhi
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P35+The+Effect+of+a+Traffic+Light+Labeling+Intervention+on+Amount+of+Food+Served+in+a+College+Dining+Hall&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+nutrition+education+and+behavior&rft.au=Martin%2C+Amy&rft.au=Vollmer%2C+Rachel+L.%2C+PhD%2C+RDN&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.issn=1499-4046&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=S40&rft.epage=S40&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jneb.2021.04.427&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S1499404621005546&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S1499404621005546
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F14994046%2FS1499404621X00073%2Fcov150h.gif