On Algorithmic Descriptions and Software Implementations for Multi-objective Optimisation: A Comparative Study
Multi-objective optimisation is a prominent subfield of optimisation with high relevance in real-world problems, such as engineering design. Over the past 2 decades, a multitude of heuristic algorithms for multi-objective optimisation have been introduced and some of them have become extremely popul...
Saved in:
| Published in: | SN computer science Vol. 1; no. 5; p. 247 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Singapore
Springer Singapore
01.09.2020
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2662-995X, 2661-8907 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Multi-objective optimisation is a prominent subfield of optimisation with high relevance in real-world problems, such as engineering design. Over the past 2 decades, a multitude of heuristic algorithms for multi-objective optimisation have been introduced and some of them have become extremely popular. Some of the most promising and versatile algorithms have been implemented in software platforms. This article experimentally investigates the process of interpreting and implementing algorithms by examining multiple popular implementations of three well-known algorithms for multi-objective optimisation. We observed that official and broadly employed software platforms interpreted and thus implemented the same heuristic search algorithm differently. These different interpretations affect the algorithmic structure as well as the software implementation. Numerical results show that these differences cause statistically significant differences in performance. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 2662-995X 2661-8907 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s42979-020-00265-1 |