Evaluation of Clauss Fibrinogen Assay Clot Waveform Analysis for the Detection of Dysfibrinogenemia on Sysmex CN‐6000

Dysfibrinogenemia is associated with thrombosis and bleeding. Identification is important as it correlates with adverse clinical outcomes. Clot waveform analysis (CWA) measures optical changes during clot formation to generate a clot waveform curve. Mathematical interpretation allows for the determi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:International journal of laboratory hematology Ročník 47; číslo 5; s. 915 - 922
Hlavní autoři: Horner, Kevin, Kitchen, Steve
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2025
Témata:
ISSN:1751-5521, 1751-553X, 1751-553X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Dysfibrinogenemia is associated with thrombosis and bleeding. Identification is important as it correlates with adverse clinical outcomes. Clot waveform analysis (CWA) measures optical changes during clot formation to generate a clot waveform curve. Mathematical interpretation allows for the determination of velocity through the first derivative (Min1). Clauss Fibrinogen (CF) Min1 correlates with fibrinogen antigen (FbAg) levels. After calibration, estimated fibrinogen antigen (eAg) can be calculated. Studies have established a ratio of functional fibrinogen activity (FbAc) to eAg (FbAc/eAg) threshold of 0.7 effective for identifying dysfibrinogenemia. Samples were analysed by CN-6000 (Sysmex) for PT-derived fibrinogen, Thrombin and Reptilase Times, CF (Dade Innovin, Thromboclotin, Baxotrobin and Dade Thrombin respectively, Siemens) and FbAg (Liaphen Fibrinogen, Hyphen), along with CF-CWA. The effectiveness of eAg for quantifying fibrinogen was compared to traditional FbAg measurements, along with the efficacy of FbAc/eAg in identifying dysfibrinogenemia relative to the classical FbAc/Ag ratio. Strong correlations between FbAg and eAg were evident in normal (R 0.9559) and hypofibrinogenemic (R 0.9119) cohorts; however, a weak correlation was observed in dysfibrinogenemic cohorts (R 0.3987). In the dysfibrinogenemic cohort, modification of the test dilution for calculating eAg was assessed; however, these changes did not enhance correlation. eAg values by both dilutions did not impair the ability of the FbAc/eAg ratio to distinguish dysfibrinogenemia from normal and hypofibrinogenemia cohorts, proving as effective as the FbAc/Ag ratio. Our results endorse the reliability of the FbAc/eAg ratio as a cost-effective parameter for identifying dysfibrinogenemia, despite eAg quantification limitations in dysfibrinogenemia cases.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.14484