Achieving Reliable Mastery of Emergency Airway Management Skills Through 4-Component Instructional Design: A Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation

We used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways Management elements in all participants. We describe the process of designing QUMAC using 4-Component Instructional Design to harness the cogni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Medical Simulation Jg. 20; H. 5; S. 297
Hauptverfasser: Gilic, Fil, McGraw, Robert, Newbigging, Joseph, Blackmore, Elizabeth, Stacey, Matthew, Mercer, Colin, Neufeld, Troy, Johannessen, Erika, Lam, Wilson, Hall, Ryan, Braund, Heather
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.10.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1559-713X, 1559-713X
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract We used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways Management elements in all participants. We describe the process of designing QUMAC using 4-Component Instructional Design to harness the cognitive load theory as a learning tool. We evaluated the effectiveness of QUMAC using an outcome-based mixed-methods approach including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and 2 Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) at course completion using blinded expert video review. We also conducted semistructured interviews at course completion and after 6 months of independent practice. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Mean OSCE Global Performance Scores were 4.1 (±0.56) of 5 for both OSCE scores; and 4.0-4.4 (±0.48-0.89) on OSATS. At course completion, 4 themes were identified: Overall Experience with the Course, Facilitators of Performance, Recommendations, and Transfer to Practice. At 6 months of independent practice 5 themes emerged: Level of Confidence, Management of Cognitive Load, Persistence, Barriers to Application, and Recommendations. All participants demonstrated a high degree of competence when assessed by OSCEs and majority did so with the OSATS. All noticed an increase in confidence and reduced cognitive load while managing airways. These persisted over 6 months of independent practice where the participants were actively managing airways as staff physicians in new workplaces. High performance expectations, automation, schemas, spaced repetition, and homework were the elements most associated with better performance and more confidence. Decreased cognitive load freed up resources for higher order thinking, while the overall sense of competence reduced the anxiety of going to work as a new emergency department staff.
AbstractList We used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways Management elements in all participants. We describe the process of designing QUMAC using 4-Component Instructional Design to harness the cognitive load theory as a learning tool. We evaluated the effectiveness of QUMAC using an outcome-based mixed-methods approach including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and 2 Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) at course completion using blinded expert video review. We also conducted semistructured interviews at course completion and after 6 months of independent practice. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Mean OSCE Global Performance Scores were 4.1 (±0.56) of 5 for both OSCE scores; and 4.0-4.4 (±0.48-0.89) on OSATS. At course completion, 4 themes were identified: Overall Experience with the Course, Facilitators of Performance, Recommendations, and Transfer to Practice. At 6 months of independent practice 5 themes emerged: Level of Confidence, Management of Cognitive Load, Persistence, Barriers to Application, and Recommendations. All participants demonstrated a high degree of competence when assessed by OSCEs and majority did so with the OSATS. All noticed an increase in confidence and reduced cognitive load while managing airways. These persisted over 6 months of independent practice where the participants were actively managing airways as staff physicians in new workplaces. High performance expectations, automation, schemas, spaced repetition, and homework were the elements most associated with better performance and more confidence. Decreased cognitive load freed up resources for higher order thinking, while the overall sense of competence reduced the anxiety of going to work as a new emergency department staff.
We used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways Management elements in all participants.INTRODUCTIONWe used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways Management elements in all participants.We describe the process of designing QUMAC using 4-Component Instructional Design to harness the cognitive load theory as a learning tool. We evaluated the effectiveness of QUMAC using an outcome-based mixed-methods approach including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and 2 Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) at course completion using blinded expert video review. We also conducted semistructured interviews at course completion and after 6 months of independent practice. Interviews were analyzed thematically.METHODSWe describe the process of designing QUMAC using 4-Component Instructional Design to harness the cognitive load theory as a learning tool. We evaluated the effectiveness of QUMAC using an outcome-based mixed-methods approach including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and 2 Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) at course completion using blinded expert video review. We also conducted semistructured interviews at course completion and after 6 months of independent practice. Interviews were analyzed thematically.Mean OSCE Global Performance Scores were 4.1 (±0.56) of 5 for both OSCE scores; and 4.0-4.4 (±0.48-0.89) on OSATS. At course completion, 4 themes were identified: Overall Experience with the Course, Facilitators of Performance, Recommendations, and Transfer to Practice. At 6 months of independent practice 5 themes emerged: Level of Confidence, Management of Cognitive Load, Persistence, Barriers to Application, and Recommendations.RESULTSMean OSCE Global Performance Scores were 4.1 (±0.56) of 5 for both OSCE scores; and 4.0-4.4 (±0.48-0.89) on OSATS. At course completion, 4 themes were identified: Overall Experience with the Course, Facilitators of Performance, Recommendations, and Transfer to Practice. At 6 months of independent practice 5 themes emerged: Level of Confidence, Management of Cognitive Load, Persistence, Barriers to Application, and Recommendations.All participants demonstrated a high degree of competence when assessed by OSCEs and majority did so with the OSATS. All noticed an increase in confidence and reduced cognitive load while managing airways. These persisted over 6 months of independent practice where the participants were actively managing airways as staff physicians in new workplaces. High performance expectations, automation, schemas, spaced repetition, and homework were the elements most associated with better performance and more confidence. Decreased cognitive load freed up resources for higher order thinking, while the overall sense of competence reduced the anxiety of going to work as a new emergency department staff.CONCLUSIONSAll participants demonstrated a high degree of competence when assessed by OSCEs and majority did so with the OSATS. All noticed an increase in confidence and reduced cognitive load while managing airways. These persisted over 6 months of independent practice where the participants were actively managing airways as staff physicians in new workplaces. High performance expectations, automation, schemas, spaced repetition, and homework were the elements most associated with better performance and more confidence. Decreased cognitive load freed up resources for higher order thinking, while the overall sense of competence reduced the anxiety of going to work as a new emergency department staff.
Author Lam, Wilson
Hall, Ryan
Blackmore, Elizabeth
Braund, Heather
Stacey, Matthew
Gilic, Fil
Neufeld, Troy
Newbigging, Joseph
McGraw, Robert
Mercer, Colin
Johannessen, Erika
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Fil
  surname: Gilic
  fullname: Gilic, Fil
  organization: From the Queen's University Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (F.G., J.N., E.B., M.S.); Queen's University Department of Emergency Medicine (R.M., C.M.); Queen's University Department of Family Medicine (T.N.); Queen's School of Medicine (E.J.); University of Ottawa Department of Emergency Medicine (W.L.); Quinte Health Care (R.H.); and Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Faculty of Health Sciences (H.B.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Robert
  surname: McGraw
  fullname: McGraw, Robert
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Newbigging
  fullname: Newbigging, Joseph
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Elizabeth
  surname: Blackmore
  fullname: Blackmore, Elizabeth
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Stacey
  fullname: Stacey, Matthew
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Colin
  surname: Mercer
  fullname: Mercer, Colin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Troy
  surname: Neufeld
  fullname: Neufeld, Troy
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Erika
  surname: Johannessen
  fullname: Johannessen, Erika
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Wilson
  surname: Lam
  fullname: Lam, Wilson
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Ryan
  surname: Hall
  fullname: Hall, Ryan
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Heather
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9749-7193
  surname: Braund
  fullname: Braund, Heather
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39960375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkM1KAzEUhYNUrFbfQCRLN6PJZNJM3JVatdCi-APuSpLeTqOZpE5m1D6DL-2oFXo358L5OBzOAer44AGhY0rOKJHi_GF8c0a2L8_EDtqnnMtEUPbc2fq76CDGF0IyTjjdQ10mZZ8wwffR18AsLbxbX-B7cFZpB3iqYg3VGocFHpVQFeDNGg9s9aHWredVASX4Gj-8WuciflxWoSmWOEuGoVy1HVtr7GNdNaa2wSuHLyHawl_gAZ7aT5jjKdTLMI_4zrpQ49G7co36QQ_R7kK5CEcb7aGnq9Hj8CaZ3F6Ph4NJYlLBRJJLTUlKBE0VF2AYl5IbKUSWapMLLSlATnQfUlA6y1hL6HYvw8lca7bIadpDp3-5qyq8NRDrWWmjAeeUh9DEGaP9nNCc_aInG7TRJcxnq8qWqlrP_gdMvwGY_XZ7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2025_04_039
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2025 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2025 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000847
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1559-713X
ExternalDocumentID 39960375
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.Z2
0R~
53G
5VS
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AARTV
AASCR
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZZY
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACNWC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADKSD
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AHQNM
AHVBC
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
BQLVK
C45
CGR
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
KD2
L-C
NPM
O9-
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OXXIT
RLZ
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
W3M
WOQ
WOW
ZY1
7X8
ACBKD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2737-89b1020712a57ec35995c97742bc87b91ee80b6e2eab443ec3b097c50dbb3f812
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1559-713X
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 09:14:31 EST 2025
Fri Oct 03 01:51:41 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords evaluation
mixed methods
Airway
instructional design
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2737-89b1020712a57ec35995c97742bc87b91ee80b6e2eab443ec3b097c50dbb3f812
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9749-7193
PMID 39960375
PQID 3168018381
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3168018381
pubmed_primary_39960375
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20251000
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2025
  text: 20251000
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Medical Simulation
PublicationTitleAlternate Simul Healthc
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0045051
Score 2.390677
Snippet We used cognitive load theory to design the Queen's University Airway Mastery (QUMAC) pilot course to work toward reliable mastery of Emergency Airways...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 297
SubjectTerms Airway Management - methods
Airway Management - standards
Clinical Competence
Cognition
Educational Measurement
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Pilot Projects
Simulation Training - organization & administration
Title Achieving Reliable Mastery of Emergency Airway Management Skills Through 4-Component Instructional Design: A Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39960375
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168018381
Volume 20
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JasMwEBVtU0ov3Zd0Q4VeRbzL7qWYNiE5OASSgm_GkiVqGuw0Tpd8Q3-6Iy_JqVCoD77YxmI8nnnSjN5D6I46DhUyYUSXrkYsqnHiOS4jDkx6YOBMM6VVik3Q4dANQ29UL7gVdVtlExPLQJ3kXK2Rd5TAkgb-5-oPszeiVKNUdbWW0NhELROgjPJqGq6qCBZk94ov1fYITMbCZuucRzvjQb-iLmwO16K_g8wy2fT2_zvMA7RXw0zsV35xiDZEdoR2grqQfoy-ff6SCrWYgFVTsto_hYNYkSYscS5xt9mUif10_hkv8bpLBo9f0-m0wJNK4AdbRIWUPFOXBms6Wnj5U9kcco99HKRfIsFBKVZd4FE6zRe4u6IZP0HPve7ksU9qXQbCAexAUvMYwBLAJkZsU8FNxVnGFY40GHcp83QhXI05whAxsywT7mBgcm5rCWOmBERxirYyGNc5wrrJRWwbPOGJsBwhY24LTxga40wajqe30W1j5gj8XhUz4kzk70W0NnQbnVXfKppVBB2RqShnTGpf_OHpS7RrKEnfsj_vCrUk_PXiGm3zj0VazG9Kh4LzcBT8AClr1no
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Achieving+Reliable+Mastery+of+Emergency+Airway+Management+Skills+Through+4-Component+Instructional+Design%3A+A+Mixed+Methods+Pilot+Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Simulation+in+healthcare+%3A+journal+of+the+Society+for+Medical+Simulation&rft.au=Gilic%2C+Fil&rft.au=McGraw%2C+Robert&rft.au=Newbigging%2C+Joseph&rft.au=Blackmore%2C+Elizabeth&rft.date=2025-10-01&rft.issn=1559-713X&rft.eissn=1559-713X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSIH.0000000000000847&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1559-713X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1559-713X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1559-713X&client=summon