Combined Denoising and Suppression of Transient Artifacts in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Using Deep Learning
Background Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a useful tool for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, due to the low signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of the technique, multiple repetitions are required, which results in prolonged scan times and increased susceptibility to artifacts. Purpose To devel...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 1413 - 1426 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.11.2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1053-1807, 1522-2586, 1522-2586 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a useful tool for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, due to the low signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of the technique, multiple repetitions are required, which results in prolonged scan times and increased susceptibility to artifacts.
Purpose
To develop a deep‐learning‐based algorithm for simultaneous denoising and suppression of transient artifacts in ASL images.
Study Type
Retrospective.
Subjects
131 pediatric neuro‐oncology patients for model training and 11 healthy adult subjects for model evaluation.
Field Strength/Sequence
3T / pseudo‐continuous and pulsed ASL with 3D gradient‐and‐spin‐echo readout.
Assessment
A denoising autoencoder (DAE) model was designed with stacked encoding/decoding convolutional layers. Reference standard images were generated by averaging 10 pairwise ASL subtraction images. The model was trained to produce perfusion images of a similar quality using a single subtraction image. Performance was compared against Gaussian and non‐local means (NLM) filters. Evaluation metrics included SNR, peak SNR (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM) of the CBF images, compared to the reference standard.
Statistical Tests
One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests for group comparisons.
Results
The DAE model was the only model to produce a significant increase in SNR compared to the raw images (P < 0.05), providing an average SNR gain of 62%. The DAE model was also effective at suppressing transient artifacts, and was the only model to show a significant improvement in accuracy in the generated CBF images, as assessed using PSNR values (P < 0.05). In addition, using data from multiple inflow time acquisitions, the DAE images produced the best fit to the Buxton kinetic model, offering a 75% reduction in the fitting error compared to the raw images.
Data Conclusion
Deep‐learning‐based algorithms provide superior accuracy when denoising ASL images, due to their ability to simultaneously increase SNR and suppress artifactual signals in raw ASL images.
Level of Evidence
3
Technical Efficacy Stage
1 |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | Contract grant sponsor: Children with Cancer UK; Contract grant number CwCUK‐15‐203. Level of EvidenceTechnical Efficacy Stage ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27255 |