Is Law Possible?
Ivan Ilyin’s text, On the Essence of Legal Consciousness [O sushchnosti pravosoznania], appears to be a straightforward exposition of law as a project of creating a genuine society, a stable order in which individuals are joined together in a common concern (obshchee delo) that strives toward perfec...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Studies in East European thought Ročník 77; číslo 6; s. 1241 - 1250 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autor: | |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01.12.2025
Springer Nature B.V |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0925-9392, 1573-0948 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Ivan Ilyin’s text, On the Essence of Legal Consciousness [O sushchnosti pravosoznania], appears to be a straightforward exposition of law as a project of creating a genuine society, a stable order in which individuals are joined together in a common concern (obshchee delo) that strives toward perfection, a formal model reflecting the traditional Orthodox striving to be at one with God (theōsis) (Il’in 2023).1 Not unlike this striving to be one with God, the structuring of that striving as a perfection of what Ilyin refers to as legal consciousness may well be infinite, raising pointed and obvious questions about law as a system of norms and the grounding of law in a striving that infinitely defers the end it sets for itself while maintaining that end as a guide. [...]the introductory essays, ranging from Paul Robinson’s succinct and elegant preface, to useful discussions of Ilyin’s life and the origins and nature of the legal treatise and its principal concept, legal consciousness (pravosoznanie), provide excellent introductions to the treatise that orient one to its main points effectively and as a proleptic response to the apparently diffuse character of Ilyin’s writing. Ilyin prefers to clarify suggestively: A consistent, analytical disclosure of ideas of a living spiritual being, of spiritual freedom, of spiritual self-activity, of spiritual dignity and equality can establish an entire system of natural subjective rights and duties, forming together what it is appropriate to call natural law, the common formulation of which permits one to speak of natural law in an objective sense. If natural law is the articulation of a hitherto unconscious or intuitive truth, how can we find a substantive standard by which to judge the accuracy of the articulation—how can we know the difference between positive law and natural law? |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0925-9392 1573-0948 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11212-024-09664-z |