Perceptions of the Learning Environment Among Medical Students With Disabilities and the Impact of Program Access

Negative learning environment experiences may contribute to burnout for medical students with disabilities (MSWD). This study explores MSWD's perceptions of the learning environment and the effects of program access (having received or not needing accommodations). The authors analyzed the Assoc...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Academic medicine Ročník 100; číslo 10; s. 1179
Hlavní autori: Moreland, Christopher J, Plegue, Melissa, Sheets, Zoie C, Pereira-Lima, Karina, Jain, Neera R, Stergiopoulos, Erene, Case, Ben, Addams, Amy, Meeks, Lisa M
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.10.2025
Predmet:
Adult
Burnout, Professional - psychology
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Female
Humans
Male
Persons with Disabilities - psychology
Persons with Disabilities - statistics & numerical data
Schools, Medical - organization & administration
Students, Medical - psychology
Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
United States
ISSN:1938-808X, 1040-2446, 1938-808X
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Negative learning environment experiences may contribute to burnout for medical students with disabilities (MSWD). This study explores MSWD's perceptions of the learning environment and the effects of program access (having received or not needing accommodations). The authors analyzed the Association of American Medical Colleges Year Two Questionnaire data from 2019 and 2020, comparing nondisabled students, MSWD with program access, and MSWD without program access (having not received or requested an accommodation, despite a need). Three learning environment measures were examined: how schools fostered students' personal and professional development; a shortened Medical School Learning Environment Scale (MSLES); and subscales on emotional climate, student-faculty interactions, and student-student interactions. Responses were compared across the 3 groups using chi-square and ANOVA tests with post-hoc pairwise comparisons. Of the 23,898 respondents, 10.2% (2,438) self-reported a disability. Among those, 83.6% (2,039) reported program access, and 13.9% (340) reported lack of program access. Students without disabilities (21,008) reported higher agreement that their school fostered their development as a person (72.2%, 15,172) and physician (90.9%, 19,089) compared with MSWD with access (65.6%, 1,312 and 89.0%, 1,778, P < .001). MSWD without access reported lower agreement than both groups (43.7%, 149 and 80.1%, 273, P < .001). There were no differences regarding the MSLES statement about high-performance standards ( F (2, 23742) = 2.35, P = .095). For the 8 remaining MSLES statements and for all 3 subscales, nondisabled students reported significantly higher agreement than MSWD with and without access, and MSWD with access had higher agreement than those without. This nationally representative study demonstrates that MSWD perceive the learning environment less favorably than their nondisabled peers. Program access partially mitigates these differences, underscoring the critical role of accommodations and the need to address structural barriers to access.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1938-808X
1040-2446
1938-808X
DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000006086