Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of dental research Vol. 95; no. 2; p. 143
Main Authors:	Brouwer, F, Askar, H, Paris, S, Schwendicke, F
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States 01.02.2016
Subjects:	Dental Caries - diagnosis Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging Dental Restoration, Permanent Fluorescence Humans Lasers Physical Examination - statistics & numerical data Radiography, Bitewing - statistics & numerical data Recurrence Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Touch - physiology Transillumination - statistics & numerical data Visual Perception - physiology dental decay diagnostic tests radiography caries detection/diagnosis evidence-based dentistry diagnostic systems
ISSN:	1544-0591, 1544-0591
Online Access:	Get more information
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present.
AbstractList	Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present. Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present.Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present.
Author	Askar, H Paris, S Brouwer, F Schwendicke, F
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: F surname: Brouwer fullname: Brouwer, F organization: Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: H surname: Askar fullname: Askar, H organization: Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: S surname: Paris fullname: Paris, S organization: Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: F surname: Schwendicke fullname: Schwendicke, F email: falk.schwendicke@charite.de organization: Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany falk.schwendicke@charite.de
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNpNj0tLAzEURoNU7EP3riRLN6O5mcxNxl2pr0JFsLoeMsmtRKaZOpkq_fcWrODq-xaHA2fMBrGNxNg5iCsAra-FkFLkqoACAYSCIzaCQqlMFCUM_v0hG6f0IQSU0uQnbChRocpLM2LzW-rJ9SG-8yW5Nnrb7fjMdoESX1AKbUw3fMqXu9TT2vbB8Rf6CvTNbfT8iXqb2WibXQrplB2vbJPo7LAT9nZ_9zp7zBbPD_PZdJE5ibrPwGpbKJ8Lm2tbozQrRI_GCBToDUgwZuVLdA5qQ9qSVwhO6druMSoLJyfs8te76drPLaW-WofkqGlspHabKtAoSinQ4B69OKDbek2-2nRhve-r_vLlD4WXXTE
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1159_000527292 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04517_x crossref_primary_10_62610_RJOR_2025_2_17_79 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_022_04709_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_joor_12483 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_020_01307_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103458 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12178780 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9103257 crossref_primary_10_18261_issn_2058_7538_2019_01_15 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2017_05_024 crossref_primary_10_1159_000528730 crossref_primary_10_1159_000542289 crossref_primary_10_12968_denu_2025_52_3_212 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11030235 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_250 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_021_04173_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41405_024_00284_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2023_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_09083_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmats_2020_601078 crossref_primary_10_2341_19_126_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2018_05_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sdentj_2023_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13193 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_023_03047_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12431 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e27734 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12041507 crossref_primary_10_1111_idj_12328 crossref_primary_10_1159_000523951 crossref_primary_10_1002_jemt_23119 crossref_primary_10_2341_18_037_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103421 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12090291 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000019595 crossref_primary_10_3390_app7050472 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj10110208 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj11120271 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_19622_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2016_12_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12412 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_04_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_09_003 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_23801_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_016_2002_1 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_23801_2 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_23801_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_104886 crossref_primary_10_1080_00016357_2022_2055789 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2018_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104604 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_020_03431_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms22126552 crossref_primary_10_2341_16_146_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actbio_2017_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2018_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034515617937 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103351 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9365845 crossref_primary_10_1002_app_48180 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_020_03268_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_019_02999_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11216591 crossref_primary_10_3390_coatings14020165 crossref_primary_10_3390_jfb11010007 crossref_primary_10_1177_00220345241247773 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26041152 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cden_2022_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_105541 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym16142081 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_023_00792_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jebdp_2020_101404 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2018_03_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma17235815 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41894_020_00086_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_016_1859_3
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.
Copyright_xml	– notice: International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.
DBID	CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8
DOI	10.1177/0022034515611041
DatabaseName	Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Dentistry
EISSN	1544-0591
ExternalDocumentID	26464398
Genre	Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- -TM .2E .2J .2N .55 01A 0R~ 18M 1~K 29K 2WC 31R 31U 31X 31Z 34H 4.4 53G 54M 5GY 5RE 5VS 7RQ 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8R4 8R5 AABMB AABOD AACMV AACTG AADUE AAEJI AAEWN AAGGD AAGLT AAGMC AAITX AAJPV AAKGS AANSI AAOVH AAPEO AAPII AAQXH AAQXI AARDL AARDX AARIX AATAA AATBZ AAUAS AAWTL AAXOT AAZBJ ABAWP ABCCA ABCJG ABDWY ABEIX ABFWQ ABHKI ABIDT ABJZC ABKRH ABLUO ABPGX ABPNF ABQKF ABQXT ABRHV ABUJY ABUWG ABVFX ABYTW ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACFEJ ACFMA ACGBL ACGFO ACGFS ACGZU ACJER ACJTF ACLFY ACLHI ACLZU ACOFE ACOXC ACPRK ACROE ACSIQ ACUAV ACUIR ACXKE ACXMB ADBBV ADDLC ADEBD ADEIA ADMPF ADNON ADRRZ ADSTG ADTBJ ADUKL ADVBO ADZZY AECGH AEDTQ AEILP AEKYL AENEX AEPTA AEQLS AERKM AESZF AEUHG AEWDL AEWHI AEXFG AEXNY AFEET AFFNX AFGYO AFKRA AFKRG AFMOU AFOSN AFQAA AFUIA AGHKR AGKLV AGNHF AGPXR AGWFA AHDMH AHJOV AHMBA AI. AIGRN AJEFB AJGYC AJMMQ AJUZI AJVBE AJXAJ ALIPV ALKWR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMCVQ ANDLU ARTOV AUTPY AUVAJ AYAKG B3H B8M B8R B8Z B94 BBNVY BBRGL BDDNI BENPR BHPHI BKEYQ BKIIM BKSCU BPACV BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI BWJAD BYIEH CAG CBRKF CCPQU CDWPY CFDXU CGR COF CORYS CQQTX CUTAK CUY CVF D-I DB0 DC- DF0 DO- DOPDO DU5 DV7 DWQXO E3Z EBD EBS ECM EIF EJD EX3 F5P FHBDP FYUFA GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION GX1 H13 HCIFZ HF~ HMCUK HZ~ J8X K.F LK8 M1P M7P N9A NAPCQ NPM O9- OHT P.9 P.B P2P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q1R Q2X Q7L Q7U Q83 ROL S01 S0X SASJQ SAUOL SCNPE SFC SGO SGR SGV SGZ SHG SPQ SPV TDR UKHRP VH1 W8F WOQ WOW X7M ZE2 ZGI ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH 7X8 AJHME
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-1a7a54d30a37ab628f66d6880606d812188fd96cc1b8e7aed461c47ba66de95c2
IEDL.DBID	7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount	82
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000368507500003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1544-0591
IngestDate	Thu Oct 02 07:10:27 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:32:08 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	2
Keywords	dental decay diagnostic tests radiography caries detection/diagnosis evidence-based dentistry diagnostic systems
Language	English
License	International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c267t-1a7a54d30a37ab628f66d6880606d812188fd96cc1b8e7aed461c47ba66de95c2
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4
PMID	26464398
PQID	1760920686
PQPubID	23479
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1760920686 pubmed_primary_26464398
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2016-Feb 20160201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2016-02-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 02 year: 2016 text: 2016-Feb
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	United States
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: United States
PublicationTitle	Journal of dental research
PublicationTitleAlternate	J Dent Res
PublicationYear	2016
SSID	ssj0019283
Score	2.4608178
SecondaryResourceType	review_article
Snippet	Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions....
SourceID	proquest pubmed
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database
StartPage	143
SubjectTerms	Dental Caries - diagnosis Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging Dental Restoration, Permanent Fluorescence Humans Lasers Physical Examination - statistics & numerical data Radiography, Bitewing - statistics & numerical data Recurrence Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Touch - physiology Transillumination - statistics & numerical data Visual Perception - physiology
Title	Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
URI	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464398 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1760920686
Volume	95
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000368507500003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEB7UCnrx_agvVvAazCbp7saLlNai0JZCFXoLm30c09pWwX_vTJLakyB4yWkDy-zszDfzzc4A3CHiaOUWT8Cr0AdJHOpAU0ZMSl7yMNaacmpJXw6HajJJR3XCbVGXVa5sYmmo7dRQjvyeSxGmET1oeJy9BzQ1itjVeoTGJjRihDKk1XKyZhHSqGzDSQ1nAoQRfE1T0ivwKIwT9OYCN5Xw3wFm6Wh6-__d4gHs1RCTtSudOIQNVxzBTpfKgmiy2zG8dB1RB-i02JjiYavnX6xTBs2s7yh9tnhgbTb-afLMKgaB6cKygVuioOtWJifw1nt67TwH9UiFwERCLgOupW4lFo8kljoXkfJCWIF3GOMYi76eK-VtKozhuXJSO5sIbhKZa1zm0paJTmGrmBbuHJhPZOSN9VxqiVGPTYmy9KE0qdIazW8TbldSylBliYfQhZt-LLK1nJpwVok6m1W9NTLEZ4SR1MUf_r6EXYQvdQ31FTQ8Xlh3DdvmE-U5vyl1Ab_D0eAbQ0O8UQ
linkProvider	ProQuest
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting+Secondary+Caries+Lesions%3A+A+Systematic+Review+and+Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+dental+research&rft.au=Brouwer%2C+F&rft.au=Askar%2C+H&rft.au=Paris%2C+S&rft.au=Schwendicke%2C+F&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.issn=1544-0591&rft.eissn=1544-0591&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F0022034515611041&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1544-0591&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1544-0591&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1544-0591&client=summon