Teaching Cobots in Learning Factories – User and Usability-Driven Implications

Up to now, industrial robots were considered as machines working for humans. In this sense, programming required special coding knowledge and skills as teaching approaches were based on imperative programming methods, formulating the solving of a problem line by line. As novel work principles consid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Procedia manufacturing Jg. 45; S. 398 - 404
Hauptverfasser: Schmidbauer, Christina, Komenda, Titanilla, Schlund, Sebastian
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 2020
Schlagworte:
ISSN:2351-9789, 2351-9789
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Up to now, industrial robots were considered as machines working for humans. In this sense, programming required special coding knowledge and skills as teaching approaches were based on imperative programming methods, formulating the solving of a problem line by line. As novel work principles consider the robot rather a tool, assisting or collaborating with the human, declarative approaches are needed, that allow for intuitiveness and modifiability. Collaborative robot (cobot) control requires intuitive interfaces, not only for ease of use but also for modifying existing execution programs. Furthermore, the increasingly diverse personnel also requires a more democratic approach to robot programming. However, there is no standard or guideline for intuitive cobot control, and it can be noticed that the usability of the diverse interfaces and systems provided on the market is rather poor. This paper compares three systems with their advantages and disadvantages concerning usability and presents the results of the standard usability score (SUS) test, which was conducted in the Vienna learning factory “TU Wien Pilot Factory for Industry 4.0”. Additionally, the paper presents an approach on how to teach different levels of cobot interaction and control addressing the skill sets needed in their individual working environments.
AbstractList Up to now, industrial robots were considered as machines working for humans. In this sense, programming required special coding knowledge and skills as teaching approaches were based on imperative programming methods, formulating the solving of a problem line by line. As novel work principles consider the robot rather a tool, assisting or collaborating with the human, declarative approaches are needed, that allow for intuitiveness and modifiability. Collaborative robot (cobot) control requires intuitive interfaces, not only for ease of use but also for modifying existing execution programs. Furthermore, the increasingly diverse personnel also requires a more democratic approach to robot programming. However, there is no standard or guideline for intuitive cobot control, and it can be noticed that the usability of the diverse interfaces and systems provided on the market is rather poor. This paper compares three systems with their advantages and disadvantages concerning usability and presents the results of the standard usability score (SUS) test, which was conducted in the Vienna learning factory “TU Wien Pilot Factory for Industry 4.0”. Additionally, the paper presents an approach on how to teach different levels of cobot interaction and control addressing the skill sets needed in their individual working environments.
Author Schmidbauer, Christina
Schlund, Sebastian
Komenda, Titanilla
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christina
  surname: Schmidbauer
  fullname: Schmidbauer, Christina
  email: Christina.Schmidbauer@tuwien.ac.at
  organization: TU Wien, Institute for Management Science, Theresianumgasse 27, 1040 Vienna, Austria
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Titanilla
  surname: Komenda
  fullname: Komenda, Titanilla
  organization: Fraunhofer Austria Research GmbH, Advanced Industrial Management, Theresianumgasse 7, 1040 Vienna, Austria
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sebastian
  surname: Schlund
  fullname: Schlund, Sebastian
  organization: TU Wien, Institute for Management Science, Theresianumgasse 27, 1040 Vienna, Austria
BookMark eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWGvfwMO-wK6z2W2y8SBItVoo6KE9hzQ7rVO2SUmWQm--g2_ok7i1HsSDwg_zM_D9zPwX7NR5h4xd5ZDlkIvrdbYNfrNcZRw4ZFB2Kk5YjxfDPFWyUqc__DkbxLgG6DguhFQ99jJDY1_JrZKRX_g2JuSSKZrgDquxsa0PhDH5eHtP5hFDYlzdGbOghtp9eh9ohy6ZbLYNWdOSd_GSnS1NE3HwPftsPn6YjZ7S6fPjZHQ3TS0Xskh5UZW5qoZVyU2lJFYCa4kWDRe5rLEEqIxViKoGAwhS1AuURkGplOBDK4o-uznm2uBjDLjUltqvE9pgqNE56EM9eq2P9ehDPRrKTkUHl7_gbaCNCfv_sNsjht1jO8KgoyV0FmsKaFtde_o74BMHjIQf
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_17979_ja_cea_2025_46_12274
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcim_2024_102770
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogr_2022_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_025_09850_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2024_01_072
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engappai_2025_110320
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procir_2021_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1109_THMS_2022_3230667
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmsy_2021_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2022_2041907
crossref_primary_10_1109_TASE_2024_3403709
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mfglet_2025_06_145
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ifacol_2024_09_083
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.104
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.050
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.121
10.1016/j.robot.2019.03.003
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187
10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.017
10.1109/INDIN.2017.8104828
10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.002
10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.048
10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_8
10.23919/DATE.2019.8714830
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Author(s)
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Author(s)
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2351-9789
EndPage 404
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_promfg_2020_04_043
S2351978920310817
GroupedDBID 0R~
0SF
457
6I.
AACTN
AAEDW
AAFTH
AALRI
AAXUO
ABMAC
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEZE
AEXQZ
AFTJW
AGHFR
AITUG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
EBS
EJD
FDB
KQ8
M~E
NCXOZ
O9-
OK1
ROL
SSZ
AAYWO
AAYXX
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFPUW
AIGII
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2673-23841985842a897e86ed7ecea2617de4008ac9ee9d0a0e076dbe7a90499625c63
ISSN 2351-9789
IngestDate Tue Nov 18 21:24:00 EST 2025
Thu Nov 13 04:33:48 EST 2025
Wed May 17 00:08:17 EDT 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Keywords Collaborative Robots
Robot Programming
Usability
Learning Concept
Cobot Teaching
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2673-23841985842a897e86ed7ecea2617de4008ac9ee9d0a0e076dbe7a90499625c63
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_promfg_2020_04_043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_promfg_2020_04_043
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_promfg_2020_04_043
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020
2020-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2020
  text: 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Procedia manufacturing
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References A. Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, M. Lankes, M. Tscheligi, The USUS Evaluation Framework for Human-Robot Interaction, AISB2009: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 4-1 (2009) 11-26.
hi!tech, Agile Fertigung für die smarte Produktion
International Conference on Industrial Informatics, (2017) 533-538.
Stanton, Salmon, Rafferty, Walker, Baber, Jenkins (bib00018) 2017
Salunkhe, Gopalakrishnan, Skoogh, Fasth-Berglund (bib0003) 2018; 25
Kildal, Tellaeche, Fernández, Maurtua (bib00012) 2018; 72
Calitz, Poisat, Cullen (bib0005) 2017; 15-1
International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, (2019) 81-93.
F. Ansari, P. Hold, W. Mayrhofer, S. Schlund, W. Sihn, Autodidact: Introducing the Concept of Mutual Learning into a Smart Factory Industry 4.0, 15
Wermann, Colombo, Pechmann, Zarte (bib0007) 2019; 31
A. Djuric, V.M. Jovanovic, D. Foster, Hands-On Learning Environment and Educational Curriculum on Collaborative Robotics, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, (2017) 1-15.
Mattson, Salunkhe, Fast-Berglund, Li, Skoogh (bib0008) 2018; 25
F. Ferraguti, A. Pertosa, C. Secchi, C. Fantuzzi, M. Bonfè, A Methodology for Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Robots for Industry 4.0, Design, Automation and Test in Europe, (2019) 1070-1075.
El Zaatari, Marei, Li, Usman (bib00013) 2019; 116
ISO 10218-2:2011: Robots and Robotic Devices - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots - Part 2: Robot Systems and Integration.
ISO/TS 15066: 2016: Robots and Robotic Devices - Collaborative Robots, International Organization for Standardization.
T.B. Ionescu, S. Schlund, C. Schmidbauer, Epistemic Debt: A Concept and Measure of Technical Ignorance in Smart Manufacturing, 10
hi!tech, Teamwork 4.0: Mensch und Roboter
W. Mayrhofer, D. Kames, S. Schlund, Made in Austria - Produktionsarbeit in Österreich 2019
International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, (2018).
Schlund, Baaij (bib0002) 2018; 14-3
Wang, Gao, Vánczy, Krüger, Wang, Makris, Chryssolouris (bib0001) 2019; 68
Abele, Metternich, Tisch, Chryssolouris, Sihn, ElMaraghy, Hummel, Ranz (bib0009) 2015; 32
Ionescu, Schlund (bib00014) 2019; 81
J. Brooke: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale, P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, editors, Usability Evaluation in Industry, (1996) Taylor and Francis.
M. Götting, F. Gosewehr, M. Müller, J. Wermann, M. Zarte, A.W. Colombo, A. Pechmann, E. Wings, Methodology and Case Study for Investigating Curricula of Study Programs in Regard to Teaching Industry 4.0, 15
ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.
(accessed Jan. 2020).
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00011
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00022
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00023
Salunkhe (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0003) 2018; 25
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00020
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00010
Stanton (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00018) 2017
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00021
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00015
Wang (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0001) 2019; 68
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00016
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00024
Calitz (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0005) 2017; 15-1
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00019
Schlund (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0002) 2018; 14-3
Wermann (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0007) 2019; 31
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00017
El Zaatari (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00013) 2019; 116
Mattson (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0008) 2018; 25
Abele (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0009) 2015; 32
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0006
Kildal (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00012) 2018; 72
Ionescu (10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00014) 2019; 81
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0004
References_xml – volume: 72
  start-page: 21
  year: 2018
  end-page: 26
  ident: bib00012
  article-title: Potential Users’ Key Concerns and Expectations for the Adoption of Cobots
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
– volume: 116
  start-page: 162
  year: 2019
  end-page: 180
  ident: bib00013
  article-title: Cobot programming for collaborative industrial tasks: An overview
  publication-title: Robotics and Autonomous Systems
– reference: ISO 10218-2:2011: Robots and Robotic Devices - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots - Part 2: Robot Systems and Integration.
– reference: International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, (2018).
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2
  year: 2018
  end-page: 9
  ident: bib0003
  article-title: Cyber-Physical Production Testbed: Literature Review and Concept Development
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
– reference: ISO/TS 15066: 2016: Robots and Robotic Devices - Collaborative Robots, International Organization for Standardization.
– volume: 15-1
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 11
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: The Future African Workplace: The Use of Collaborative Robots in Manufacturing
  publication-title: SA Journal of Human Resource Management
– reference: International Conference on Industrial Informatics, (2017) 533-538.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 302
  year: 2019
  end-page: 308
  ident: bib0007
  article-title: Using an Interdisciplinary Demonstration Platform for Teaching Industry 4.0
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
– reference: F. Ferraguti, A. Pertosa, C. Secchi, C. Fantuzzi, M. Bonfè, A Methodology for Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Robots for Industry 4.0, Design, Automation and Test in Europe, (2019) 1070-1075.
– reference: M. Götting, F. Gosewehr, M. Müller, J. Wermann, M. Zarte, A.W. Colombo, A. Pechmann, E. Wings, Methodology and Case Study for Investigating Curricula of Study Programs in Regard to Teaching Industry 4.0, 15
– volume: 81
  start-page: 93
  year: 2019
  end-page: 98
  ident: bib00014
  article-title: A Participatory Programming Model for Democratizing Cobot Technology in Public and Industrial Fablabs
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
– volume: 25
  start-page: 526
  year: 2018
  end-page: 534
  ident: bib0008
  article-title: Design Concept towards a human-centered Learning Factory
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
– reference: A. Djuric, V.M. Jovanovic, D. Foster, Hands-On Learning Environment and Educational Curriculum on Collaborative Robotics, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, (2017) 1-15.
– reference: A. Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, M. Lankes, M. Tscheligi, The USUS Evaluation Framework for Human-Robot Interaction, AISB2009: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 4-1 (2009) 11-26.
– reference: J. Brooke: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale, P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, editors, Usability Evaluation in Industry, (1996) Taylor and Francis.
– volume: 68
  start-page: 701
  year: 2019
  end-page: 726
  ident: bib0001
  article-title: Symbiotic human-robot collaborative assembly
  publication-title: CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 6
  ident: bib0009
  article-title: Learning factories for research, education, and training
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
– volume: 14-3
  year: 2018
  ident: bib0002
  article-title: Describing the technological scope of industry 4.0-a review of survey publications
  publication-title: LogForum
– reference: hi!tech, Teamwork 4.0: Mensch und Roboter,
– reference: hi!tech, Agile Fertigung für die smarte Produktion,
– reference: F. Ansari, P. Hold, W. Mayrhofer, S. Schlund, W. Sihn, Autodidact: Introducing the Concept of Mutual Learning into a Smart Factory Industry 4.0, 15
– reference: T.B. Ionescu, S. Schlund, C. Schmidbauer, Epistemic Debt: A Concept and Measure of Technical Ignorance in Smart Manufacturing, 10
– reference: W. Mayrhofer, D. Kames, S. Schlund, Made in Austria - Produktionsarbeit in Österreich 2019,
– reference: ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.
– reference: , (accessed Jan. 2020).
– year: 2017
  ident: bib00018
  publication-title: Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design
– reference: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, (2019) 81-93.
– volume: 72
  start-page: 21
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00012
  article-title: Potential Users’ Key Concerns and Expectations for the Adoption of Cobots
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
  doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.104
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00010
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0003
  article-title: Cyber-Physical Production Testbed: Literature Review and Concept Development
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
  doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.050
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00011
– volume: 14-3
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0002
  article-title: Describing the technological scope of industry 4.0-a review of survey publications
  publication-title: LogForum
– volume: 25
  start-page: 526
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0008
  article-title: Design Concept towards a human-centered Learning Factory
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
  doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.121
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00015
– volume: 116
  start-page: 162
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00013
  article-title: Cobot programming for collaborative industrial tasks: An overview
  publication-title: Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.03.003
– volume: 15-1
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0005
  article-title: The Future African Workplace: The Use of Collaborative Robots in Manufacturing
  publication-title: SA Journal of Human Resource Management
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0009
  article-title: Learning factories for research, education, and training
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
  doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187
– volume: 81
  start-page: 93
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00014
  article-title: A Participatory Programming Model for Democratizing Cobot Technology in Public and Industrial Fablabs
  publication-title: Procedia CIRP
  doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.017
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00020
  doi: 10.1109/INDIN.2017.8104828
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00019
– volume: 68
  start-page: 701
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0001
  article-title: Symbiotic human-robot collaborative assembly
  publication-title: CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology
  doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.002
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0004
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00018
– volume: 31
  start-page: 302
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0007
  article-title: Using an Interdisciplinary Demonstration Platform for Teaching Industry 4.0
  publication-title: Procedia Manufacturing
  doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.048
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00017
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00024
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00021
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00022
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib0006
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00023
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_8
– ident: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043_bib00016
  doi: 10.23919/DATE.2019.8714830
SSID ssj0001626679
Score 2.3089976
Snippet Up to now, industrial robots were considered as machines working for humans. In this sense, programming required special coding knowledge and skills as...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 398
SubjectTerms Cobot Teaching
Collaborative Robots
Learning Concept
Robot Programming
Usability
Title Teaching Cobots in Learning Factories – User and Usability-Driven Implications
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043
Volume 45
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2351-9789
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001626679
  issn: 2351-9789
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3daxNBEF9i9cEXqahYv9gH32Rlc7t3e_so1dKHWgptpG_H7VdNSS4lXkpFEP8H_0P_Eme_0tgUtYIQjmTJ3i47P-Zm5mZ-g9BLxZ0zRnGinaKEl5aTtlCaOEMrBSYFc4FM58Oe2N-vj4_lwWDwJdfCnE9E19UXF_Lsv4oaxkDYvnT2BuJe3hQG4DsIHa4gdrj-neBzfuT2TM36kO66l-MfO6G7ztiHWlOSA3s1gl2FVwijyLbbfyZv514HBubgX0J6yYgNxQWAK5_6uvCVEaHU8fKVzsfp2Kh2kUoMA3tBatIdi2ymtjNtBAqYpqntUZ47WcRQ96GFB2yfwZviEgW9DJOtlcp4bVawckjAZY360V4zltQxL1f0KYstqtOjmcdOxWtaPwYgTv0zZ-pOXvvdBP7aSAB1hU_70K_qFy08K2o9FLfQ7UKU0vf9eP91JUAHrl4VuBqX28yllyE_cH2x602bFXPlaBPdS34GfhPxcR8NbPcAHWRs4IgNPO5wxgZeYgP_-PYde1RgQAW-igq8ioqHaLTz7mh7l6SWGkQXlWAEDDQ-lDVYnUVbS2HryhphtW09Mb-xoNDrVktrpaEttVRURlnRSu8Xg6OsK_YIbXSzzj5GmFspDauocLXjXGhVwokOK2cc-ORU8S3E8mk0OvHN-7YnkyYnFp428Qwbf4YN5fBhW4gsZ51FvpU__F_kg26SzRhtwQbA8duZT_555lN01_-KgbhnaKOfL-xzdEef9-NP8xcBRT8BjVeUVA
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching+Cobots+in+Learning+Factories+%E2%80%93+User+and+Usability-Driven+Implications&rft.jtitle=Procedia+manufacturing&rft.au=Schmidbauer%2C+Christina&rft.au=Komenda%2C+Titanilla&rft.au=Schlund%2C+Sebastian&rft.date=2020&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=2351-9789&rft.eissn=2351-9789&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.promfg.2020.04.043&rft.externalDocID=S2351978920310817
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2351-9789&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2351-9789&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2351-9789&client=summon