Soft Law in Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum : What Lessons for Business and Human Rights?

This contribution, rather than focusing on the debates within the Business and Human Rights (BHR) domain itself, offers a comparison between soft law regulation in the BHR context, on the one hand, and in the jus in bello (JIB) and jus ad bellum (JAB) contexts, on the other. Specifically, this contr...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:AJIL unbound Ročník 114; s. 174 - 178
Hlavní autor: Dunkelberg, Alonso Gurmendi
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Washington Cambridge University Press 2020
Témata:
Human rights
Humanitarianism
International law
Participation
Scholars
Self defense
Treaties
United States > US
ISSN:2398-7723, 2398-7723
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This contribution, rather than focusing on the debates within the Business and Human Rights (BHR) domain itself, offers a comparison between soft law regulation in the BHR context, on the one hand, and in the jus in bello (JIB) and jus ad bellum (JAB) contexts, on the other. Specifically, this contribution looks at the recent experience in JIB and JAB wherein states and other actors have tried to address the indeterminacy of treaty law provisions through soft law proposals that advance a disputed interpretation of hard law, producing legal uncertainty and scholarly debate. I use as examples the 2009 Interpretive Guidance on Direct Participation in Hostilities and the 2012 Bethlehem Principles as a way to extract lessons for the codifying momentum underway in BHR.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2398-7723
2398-7723
DOI:10.1017/aju.2020.34