Data Protection Impact Assessment under the EU General Data Protection Regulation: A feminist reflection

Can the Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) under Article 35 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) address the power imbalances between those in control of information and the most vulnerable and marginalised persons to whom this information refers? Put another way, can DPIA be considered a...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:The computer law and security report Ročník 53
Hlavní autor: Calvi, Alessandra
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2024
Témata:
DPIA
Feminist legal methods
GDPR enforcement
Intersectionality
Right to DPIA
Feminist legal methods
Right to DPIA
Intersectionality
DPIA
GDPR enforcement
ISSN:2212-473X, 2212-4748
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Can the Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) under Article 35 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) address the power imbalances between those in control of information and the most vulnerable and marginalised persons to whom this information refers? Put another way, can DPIA be considered a feminist tool? Whilst data protection scholars and regulators consider DPIA a promising instrument for the protection of the fundamental rights threatened by personal data processing, particularly when performed by automated systems, a feminist critique thereof, essential to comprehensively evaluate whether such optimism is justified, is still missing. This contribution addresses this knowledge gap using a combination of doctrinal and non-doctrinal analysis, feminist legal methods and intersectionality. Building on the state of the art about DPIA, I revisit its advantages and drawbacks through feminist lenses, concluding that DPIA cannot be considered a feminist tool as such. Yet, it could still serve feminist goals and become an empowering instrument for data subjects. For that, my proposals are to incorporate feminist legal methods and intersectionality principles in the process and to conceptualise a “right to DPIA”.
ISSN:2212-473X
2212-4748
DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105950