Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

Limited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare perioperative variables, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimal c...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ročník 30; číslo 21; s. e1382
Hlavní autoři: Patel, Madhav R, Jacob, Kevin C, Pawlowski, Hanna, Prabhu, Michael C, Vanjani, Nisheka N, Singh, Kern
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 01.11.2022
ISSN:1940-5480, 1940-5480
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Limited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare perioperative variables, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates between these surgical approaches.INTRODUCTIONLimited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare perioperative variables, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates between these surgical approaches.Patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF or ALIF were identified in a surgical database. Patients were divided into MIS TLIF and ALIF cohorts. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were collected and compared between groups using the chi square test or Student t-test. PROMs including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form Physical Composite Score, visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected at preoperative, 6-, 12-week, 6-month, 1-, and 2-year time points. Mean PROMs were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples. MCID attainment was determined using established values in the literature; achievement rates by grouping were compared using chi square analysis.METHODSPatients with isthmic spondylolisthesis undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF or ALIF were identified in a surgical database. Patients were divided into MIS TLIF and ALIF cohorts. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were collected and compared between groups using the chi square test or Student t-test. PROMs including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form Physical Composite Score, visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected at preoperative, 6-, 12-week, 6-month, 1-, and 2-year time points. Mean PROMs were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples. MCID attainment was determined using established values in the literature; achievement rates by grouping were compared using chi square analysis.One hundred seventy-one patients were included, 121 MIS TLIF and 50 ALIF. No demographic differences were observed. Mean surgical times were 139.7 minutes (MIS TLIF) and 165.5 minutes (ALIF) (P < 0.001). No other perioperative differences were observed. Mean estimated blood loss values were 63.8 mL (MIS TLIF) and 73.7 mL (ALIF). Mean postoperative lengths of stay were 43.9 hours (MIS TLIF) and 42.5 hours (ALIF). Mean PROMs did not markedly differ among groups at any time point. MCID attainment was markedly higher among MIS TLIF patients for the Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.046) and 12 weeks (P = 0.007), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function at 12 weeks (P = 0.015), and VAS leg at 6 weeks (P = 0.031) and 12 weeks (P = 0.045). No other notable differences were observed among MCID achievement by grouping.RESULTSOne hundred seventy-one patients were included, 121 MIS TLIF and 50 ALIF. No demographic differences were observed. Mean surgical times were 139.7 minutes (MIS TLIF) and 165.5 minutes (ALIF) (P < 0.001). No other perioperative differences were observed. Mean estimated blood loss values were 63.8 mL (MIS TLIF) and 73.7 mL (ALIF). Mean postoperative lengths of stay were 43.9 hours (MIS TLIF) and 42.5 hours (ALIF). Mean PROMs did not markedly differ among groups at any time point. MCID attainment was markedly higher among MIS TLIF patients for the Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.046) and 12 weeks (P = 0.007), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function at 12 weeks (P = 0.015), and VAS leg at 6 weeks (P = 0.031) and 12 weeks (P = 0.045). No other notable differences were observed among MCID achievement by grouping.While single-level ALIF demonstrated markedly higher surgical times, other perioperative characteristics and PROMs were comparable among ALIF and MIS TLIF patients. Although MCID achievement rates were generally lower for disability and leg pain among ALIF patients, significance was not reached at 6 months, 1 year, or during the overall postoperative period after fusion.DISCUSSIONWhile single-level ALIF demonstrated markedly higher surgical times, other perioperative characteristics and PROMs were comparable among ALIF and MIS TLIF patients. Although MCID achievement rates were generally lower for disability and leg pain among ALIF patients, significance was not reached at 6 months, 1 year, or during the overall postoperative period after fusion.
AbstractList Limited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare perioperative variables, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates between these surgical approaches.INTRODUCTIONLimited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare perioperative variables, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates between these surgical approaches.Patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF or ALIF were identified in a surgical database. Patients were divided into MIS TLIF and ALIF cohorts. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were collected and compared between groups using the chi square test or Student t-test. PROMs including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form Physical Composite Score, visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected at preoperative, 6-, 12-week, 6-month, 1-, and 2-year time points. Mean PROMs were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples. MCID attainment was determined using established values in the literature; achievement rates by grouping were compared using chi square analysis.METHODSPatients with isthmic spondylolisthesis undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF or ALIF were identified in a surgical database. Patients were divided into MIS TLIF and ALIF cohorts. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were collected and compared between groups using the chi square test or Student t-test. PROMs including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form Physical Composite Score, visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected at preoperative, 6-, 12-week, 6-month, 1-, and 2-year time points. Mean PROMs were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples. MCID attainment was determined using established values in the literature; achievement rates by grouping were compared using chi square analysis.One hundred seventy-one patients were included, 121 MIS TLIF and 50 ALIF. No demographic differences were observed. Mean surgical times were 139.7 minutes (MIS TLIF) and 165.5 minutes (ALIF) (P < 0.001). No other perioperative differences were observed. Mean estimated blood loss values were 63.8 mL (MIS TLIF) and 73.7 mL (ALIF). Mean postoperative lengths of stay were 43.9 hours (MIS TLIF) and 42.5 hours (ALIF). Mean PROMs did not markedly differ among groups at any time point. MCID attainment was markedly higher among MIS TLIF patients for the Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.046) and 12 weeks (P = 0.007), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function at 12 weeks (P = 0.015), and VAS leg at 6 weeks (P = 0.031) and 12 weeks (P = 0.045). No other notable differences were observed among MCID achievement by grouping.RESULTSOne hundred seventy-one patients were included, 121 MIS TLIF and 50 ALIF. No demographic differences were observed. Mean surgical times were 139.7 minutes (MIS TLIF) and 165.5 minutes (ALIF) (P < 0.001). No other perioperative differences were observed. Mean estimated blood loss values were 63.8 mL (MIS TLIF) and 73.7 mL (ALIF). Mean postoperative lengths of stay were 43.9 hours (MIS TLIF) and 42.5 hours (ALIF). Mean PROMs did not markedly differ among groups at any time point. MCID attainment was markedly higher among MIS TLIF patients for the Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.046) and 12 weeks (P = 0.007), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function at 12 weeks (P = 0.015), and VAS leg at 6 weeks (P = 0.031) and 12 weeks (P = 0.045). No other notable differences were observed among MCID achievement by grouping.While single-level ALIF demonstrated markedly higher surgical times, other perioperative characteristics and PROMs were comparable among ALIF and MIS TLIF patients. Although MCID achievement rates were generally lower for disability and leg pain among ALIF patients, significance was not reached at 6 months, 1 year, or during the overall postoperative period after fusion.DISCUSSIONWhile single-level ALIF demonstrated markedly higher surgical times, other perioperative characteristics and PROMs were comparable among ALIF and MIS TLIF patients. Although MCID achievement rates were generally lower for disability and leg pain among ALIF patients, significance was not reached at 6 months, 1 year, or during the overall postoperative period after fusion.
Author Jacob, Kevin C
Vanjani, Nisheka N
Pawlowski, Hanna
Prabhu, Michael C
Singh, Kern
Patel, Madhav R
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Madhav R
  surname: Patel
  fullname: Patel, Madhav R
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kevin C
  surname: Jacob
  fullname: Jacob, Kevin C
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hanna
  surname: Pawlowski
  fullname: Pawlowski, Hanna
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Michael C
  surname: Prabhu
  fullname: Prabhu, Michael C
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Nisheka N
  surname: Vanjani
  fullname: Vanjani, Nisheka N
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kern
  surname: Singh
  fullname: Singh, Kern
BookMark eNp1jDFPwzAYRC1UJFpgZ_TIErAdO8FjVSgUFXVIYa0c-0tr5NjFTir1D_E7CYKBhelO705vgkY-eEDoipIbwXNx-zydrqrsPmM0I5QKdoLGVHKSCX5HRn_6GZqk9E4ILXghx-izsn7rIHNwAIdfrLetcu6IF_6gkj0AXkflUxOiaq1XDi_7tlZxmDuIdTBHPO-TDR6_QUx9wtNvbkP89zeYcLcDXPVxa_UgXEdQXQu-w6HBi9TtWqtxtQ_eHF1wdgCQbLpAp41yCS5_8xy9zh_Ws6dsuXpczKbLTDNB80xISQ0xSkKea2K4bojiJTUFB2LkgEpQRa2Z1HktyrogXPCSl402gjSyoewcXf949zF89JC6TWuTBueUh9CnDStZIVkuCs6-ACF1djs
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682241226659
crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251316280
crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251356221
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_90586
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e32576
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
DBID 7X8
DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01152
DatabaseName MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1940-5480
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
18M
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
6PF
7X8
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMOA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AAWTL
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACBKD
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACNWC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADKSD
ADSXY
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AHOMT
AHQNM
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
C45
DIWNM
EBS
EEVPB
ERAAH
EX3
F5P
FCALG
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HZ~
IAO
IEA
IHR
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
L-C
O9-
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OXXIT
P2P
RIG
RLZ
S4S
SJN
TEORI
TOR
TSPGW
UQU
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2513-5991d0da9e33c0d4cf0a471d64e0d93c07ea6bc29c3b57b60454747fcd50f9f12
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 5
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000870404300013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1940-5480
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 14:22:08 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 21
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2513-5991d0da9e33c0d4cf0a471d64e0d93c07ea6bc29c3b57b60454747fcd50f9f12
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 2726923564
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2726923564
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20221101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2022
  text: 20221101
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssj0016469
Score 2.3849428
Snippet Limited studies have compared minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the...
SourceID proquest
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage e1382
Title Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2726923564
Volume 30
WOSCitedRecordID wos000870404300013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFA7eHnzxgop3Ivga1jZpuz7JUIcTncIm7G2kubBC1-pqhf0hf6fnxI6BIAi-hkMIyck537kTcilDm5pYYOdHrpkIuWFSporFoTSCRyrwrXvph7jfb49GyXPjcKuatMqFTHSCWpcKfeStIA4iACNhJK5e3xhOjcLoajNCY5Wsc4AymNIVj5ZRhEi4kXZgp3sM-5p9hylDQAit-07nacBuWIDGtI9lRz9EsdMv3e3_nmyHbDXIkna-WWGXrJhij3wOQDXlhuWYG0QfsyKbyjyf017xITFxnQ4b4CrdcC_6UE9TOaPOT5iWek67NbrTKLrV6op2cD0rZ7_SwU4UICUd1DMnUmH_JpGdlpb2qvfJNFN08FoWep6XOfDYxFRZtU9eurfD6zvWjGZgCgARZyHASu1pmRjOlaeFsp4ENacjYTydwFJsZJSqIFE8DeM0wkZ_YLhYpUPPJtYPDshaURbmkFDJkxRgifUjry1UW0iOsbxYA6kSiS-OyMXi2sfA-hjPkIUp62q8vPjjP9CckM0ASxdcHeEpWbfwvc0Z2VAf71k1O3ec8wUbedHe
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-level+Minimally+Invasive+Transforaminal+Lumbar+Interbody+Fusion+Versus+Anterior+Lumbar+Interbody+Fusion+for+the+Surgical+Treatment+of+Isthmic+Spondylolisthesis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Academy+of+Orthopaedic+Surgeons&rft.au=Patel%2C+Madhav+R&rft.au=Jacob%2C+Kevin+C&rft.au=Pawlowski%2C+Hanna&rft.au=Prabhu%2C+Michael+C&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.issn=1940-5480&rft.eissn=1940-5480&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=e1382&rft_id=info:doi/10.5435%2FJAAOS-D-21-01152&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1940-5480&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1940-5480&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1940-5480&client=summon