Student perspectives on AI‐supported formative assessment in pharmacology
High-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is resource-intensive to produce. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution, but little is known about students' perspectives on AI-generate...
Saved in:
| Published in: | British journal of clinical pharmacology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
29.08.2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0306-5251, 1365-2125, 1365-2125 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | High-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is resource-intensive to produce. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution, but little is known about students' perspectives on AI-generated feedback. This study investigated how medical students perceived and made use of AI feedback in a formative assessment while studying fundamental pharmacology.
We used a qualitative approach to explore how third year medical students perceived AI score and feedback after completing a formative test containing eight short-answer questions on core concepts in pharmacology. Data were collected using focus groups (n = 11). In an iterative thematic approach, the transcripts were analysed and themes identified.
Three themes representing factors that affect students' experiences with AI-generated feedback were identified in the analyses: (1) trustworthy and accessible feedback information, (2) aligning the feedback with the study programme and (3) student feedback literacy.
Our findings illustrate the complex interplay between technological, contextual and individual factors in shaping the effectiveness of AI-supported formative assessment. Students found the AI-generated feedback to be useful and mostly reliable, but raised concerns regarding AI being overly positive, the timing and mandatory nature of the assessment, and the workload required to engage with lengthy narrative feedback comments. While AI tools have the potential to provide reliable, personalized and effective feedback, its implementation needs to ensure that students are equipped with feedback literacy and that the educational programme incentivizes meaningful engagement with feedback. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | High-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is resource-intensive to produce. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution, but little is known about students' perspectives on AI-generated feedback. This study investigated how medical students perceived and made use of AI feedback in a formative assessment while studying fundamental pharmacology.
We used a qualitative approach to explore how third year medical students perceived AI score and feedback after completing a formative test containing eight short-answer questions on core concepts in pharmacology. Data were collected using focus groups (n = 11). In an iterative thematic approach, the transcripts were analysed and themes identified.
Three themes representing factors that affect students' experiences with AI-generated feedback were identified in the analyses: (1) trustworthy and accessible feedback information, (2) aligning the feedback with the study programme and (3) student feedback literacy.
Our findings illustrate the complex interplay between technological, contextual and individual factors in shaping the effectiveness of AI-supported formative assessment. Students found the AI-generated feedback to be useful and mostly reliable, but raised concerns regarding AI being overly positive, the timing and mandatory nature of the assessment, and the workload required to engage with lengthy narrative feedback comments. While AI tools have the potential to provide reliable, personalized and effective feedback, its implementation needs to ensure that students are equipped with feedback literacy and that the educational programme incentivizes meaningful engagement with feedback. High-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is resource-intensive to produce. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution, but little is known about students' perspectives on AI-generated feedback. This study investigated how medical students perceived and made use of AI feedback in a formative assessment while studying fundamental pharmacology.AIMSHigh-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is resource-intensive to produce. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution, but little is known about students' perspectives on AI-generated feedback. This study investigated how medical students perceived and made use of AI feedback in a formative assessment while studying fundamental pharmacology.We used a qualitative approach to explore how third year medical students perceived AI score and feedback after completing a formative test containing eight short-answer questions on core concepts in pharmacology. Data were collected using focus groups (n = 11). In an iterative thematic approach, the transcripts were analysed and themes identified.METHODSWe used a qualitative approach to explore how third year medical students perceived AI score and feedback after completing a formative test containing eight short-answer questions on core concepts in pharmacology. Data were collected using focus groups (n = 11). In an iterative thematic approach, the transcripts were analysed and themes identified.Three themes representing factors that affect students' experiences with AI-generated feedback were identified in the analyses: (1) trustworthy and accessible feedback information, (2) aligning the feedback with the study programme and (3) student feedback literacy.RESULTSThree themes representing factors that affect students' experiences with AI-generated feedback were identified in the analyses: (1) trustworthy and accessible feedback information, (2) aligning the feedback with the study programme and (3) student feedback literacy.Our findings illustrate the complex interplay between technological, contextual and individual factors in shaping the effectiveness of AI-supported formative assessment. Students found the AI-generated feedback to be useful and mostly reliable, but raised concerns regarding AI being overly positive, the timing and mandatory nature of the assessment, and the workload required to engage with lengthy narrative feedback comments. While AI tools have the potential to provide reliable, personalized and effective feedback, its implementation needs to ensure that students are equipped with feedback literacy and that the educational programme incentivizes meaningful engagement with feedback.CONCLUSIONSOur findings illustrate the complex interplay between technological, contextual and individual factors in shaping the effectiveness of AI-supported formative assessment. Students found the AI-generated feedback to be useful and mostly reliable, but raised concerns regarding AI being overly positive, the timing and mandatory nature of the assessment, and the workload required to engage with lengthy narrative feedback comments. While AI tools have the potential to provide reliable, personalized and effective feedback, its implementation needs to ensure that students are equipped with feedback literacy and that the educational programme incentivizes meaningful engagement with feedback. |
| Author | Mork, Tiril Egset Kvernenes, Monika Repstad, Øyvind Bru, Christian Serkland, Trond Trætteberg Berg, Jon Andsnes Tenstad, Olav |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jon Andsnes orcidid: 0000-0001-8583-6349 surname: Berg fullname: Berg, Jon Andsnes organization: Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway – sequence: 2 givenname: Øyvind orcidid: 0009-0002-2985-0423 surname: Repstad fullname: Repstad, Øyvind organization: Faculty of Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway – sequence: 3 givenname: Trond Trætteberg orcidid: 0000-0001-7475-1147 surname: Serkland fullname: Serkland, Trond Trætteberg organization: Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway – sequence: 4 givenname: Tiril Egset orcidid: 0009-0009-7890-9170 surname: Mork fullname: Mork, Tiril Egset organization: Faculty of Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway – sequence: 5 givenname: Christian surname: Bru fullname: Bru, Christian organization: Fjordbyte AS Bergen Norway – sequence: 6 givenname: Olav orcidid: 0000-0001-5833-2620 surname: Tenstad fullname: Tenstad, Olav organization: Department of biomedicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway – sequence: 7 givenname: Monika orcidid: 0000-0002-6042-6383 surname: Kvernenes fullname: Kvernenes, Monika organization: Center for medical education and Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40883861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNo9kMlOwzAURS1URAdY8AMoS1ikeIiHLCvEUFGJBbCOHOcZgprY2AlSd3wC38iXkNLC6i7uee9KZ4pGrWsBoVOC5wRjelkaP5eYCnmAJoQJnlJC-QhNMMMi5ZSTMZrG-IYxYUTwIzTOsFJMCTJB949dX0HbJR5C9GC6-gNi4tpksfz-_Iq99y50UCXWhUZvy0THCDE225u6TfyrHgrj1u5lc4wOrV5HONnnDD3fXD9d3aWrh9vl1WKVGprJLtX5MJ9RnlMpS1FJpaxgSlYkz3GplbXK5JZLENxkNGMVyyVYKAUmBAzjJZuh891fH9x7D7ErmjoaWK91C66PBaOZYDznkg3o2R7tywaqwoe60WFT_AkYgIsdYIKLMYD9RwgutnKLQW7xK5f9ALNGbMM |
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/02602938.2025.2501696 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 10.1111/bcp.13491 10.1186/s12909‐024‐06026‐5 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177257 10.3390/ime3010004 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177256 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2445037 10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115 10.1080/02602938.2025.2502582 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1839035 10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807 10.3390/educsci12100717 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002971 10.1371/journal.pone.0079802 10.1080/02602938.2025.2459641 10.1037/0003‐066X.55.1.68 10.1111/medu.12744 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2208731 10.1007/978‐3‐030‐25112‐3_5 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2 10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434 10.3102/003465430298487 10.1111/bph.16000 10.1080/03075070600572090 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 British Pharmacological Society. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 British Pharmacological Society. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/bcp.70267 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
| EISSN | 1365-2125 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40883861 10_1002_bcp_70267 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Universitetet i Bergen grantid: Incentive funds for study quality – fundername: University of Bergen – fundername: Universitetet i Bergen grantid: UiB Idé |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23N 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AAXRX AAYCA AAYXX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AOIJS ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CITATION CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS F00 F01 F04 F5P FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HGLYW HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LSO LUTES LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O8X O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TEORI TR2 UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YOC YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT ALUQN NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-a94084259277b6d788f6387d1990ba8ff8c9f57e65c4243d397efeb6011ec35b3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001563362000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
| IngestDate | Sat Nov 01 14:15:06 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 05:04:59 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:55:12 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | feedback literacy formative assessment artificial intelligence |
| Language | English |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025 British Pharmacological Society. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c247t-a94084259277b6d788f6387d1990ba8ff8c9f57e65c4243d397efeb6011ec35b3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7475-1147 0009-0009-7890-9170 0000-0001-5833-2620 0009-0002-2985-0423 0000-0002-6042-6383 0000-0001-8583-6349 |
| PMID | 40883861 |
| PQID | 3246359573 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3246359573 pubmed_primary_40883861 crossref_primary_10_1002_bcp_70267 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-08-29 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-08-29 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-08-29 day: 29 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | British journal of clinical pharmacology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Clin Pharmacol |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| References | e_1_2_10_23_1 e_1_2_10_24_1 e_1_2_10_21_1 e_1_2_10_22_1 e_1_2_10_20_1 e_1_2_10_2_1 e_1_2_10_4_1 e_1_2_10_18_1 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_19_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_16_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_17_1 e_1_2_10_8_1 e_1_2_10_14_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 e_1_2_10_15_1 e_1_2_10_12_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_13_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_11_1 e_1_2_10_27_1 e_1_2_10_25_1 e_1_2_10_26_1 |
| References_xml | – ident: e_1_2_10_19_1 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2501696 – ident: e_1_2_10_14_1 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1111/bcp.13491 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.1186/s12909‐024‐06026‐5 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177257 – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.3390/ime3010004 – ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177256 – ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2445037 – ident: e_1_2_10_23_1 doi: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115 – ident: e_1_2_10_18_1 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2502582 – ident: e_1_2_10_27_1 doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1839035 – ident: e_1_2_10_13_1 doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807 – ident: e_1_2_10_25_1 doi: 10.3390/educsci12100717 – ident: e_1_2_10_20_1 doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002971 – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079802 – ident: e_1_2_10_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2459641 – ident: e_1_2_10_24_1 doi: 10.1037/0003‐066X.55.1.68 – ident: e_1_2_10_21_1 doi: 10.1111/medu.12744 – ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2208731 – ident: e_1_2_10_15_1 doi: 10.1007/978‐3‐030‐25112‐3_5 – ident: e_1_2_10_17_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2 – ident: e_1_2_10_22_1 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 doi: 10.3102/003465430298487 – ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 doi: 10.1111/bph.16000 – ident: e_1_2_10_16_1 doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090 |
| SSID | ssj0013165 |
| Score | 2.4672976 |
| SecondaryResourceType | online_first |
| Snippet | High-quality feedback is crucial for helping medical students understand and apply core concepts of pharmacology, yet personalized feedback is... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| Title | Student perspectives on AI‐supported formative assessment in pharmacology |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40883861 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246359573 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001563362000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2125 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013165 issn: 0306-5251 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6lLQcuiDfhUS0I9dIa7PVjd48RtKICVRGkUm6WvV6jiGoT2UnU3voT-I38EmYfXqdESOXAxYosrR3vjMczO9_3LUJvSQxZQFnxoOCyChLIOQJGhAwgWciKWtRpKoTZbIKenbHplI8Hg-uOC7O-oEqxy0u--K-mhnNgbE2d_Qdz-4vCCfgNRocjmB2OtzL8N6tWqQWJOxqlaQmMTj2woV0tjJ551XEX1_Kw8BKdBljeK1rf7Ps6DaQNwQnPrdwaY-g_jUP8Ko2dbFUPWYTUHzJT42C6W8_Z1XqmKr_iI5sfHehy0miSzcQ29bPlUnpZLosWtmDvWTO7ODz-3jpGt1vJIKlemnXLHY7BFWZQGDsBWmkDskHhRZYcvRXurXxsKRbvqN5Jq_-mdX38Pz51HoBoxZpJDkNzM3QH7RGacoiUex-_npx_6TtRkdmO1P-3Tp0qJO_9fW_mNH8pVEzCMrmP7rlKA4-shzxAA6keooOxNdLVEZ70zLv2CB_g8Yb5HqHPzo3wphvhucKj01_XP70DYe9AuHcgPFN40xkeo_OT48mHT4HbeCMQJKFLeG-TULdnOaG0zCrKWA1hmlYRpC5lweqaCV6nVGapSEgSV5DTylqWUNtHUsRpGT9Bu2qu5DOE46LSretYJqxOyiLlskxDUkQypJKXVTREb7qpyxdWXyXfMs4Qve4mNYfop1tahZLzVZtDOZBpajmNh-ipnW1_GXgGFrMsen6bW7xAd3uXfIl2l81KvkJ3xBpeqmYf7dAp23eu8RvyPIiZ |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student+perspectives+on+AI%E2%80%90supported+formative+assessment+in+pharmacology&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+clinical+pharmacology&rft.au=Berg%2C+Jon+Andsnes&rft.au=Repstad%2C+%C3%98yvind&rft.au=Serkland%2C+Trond+Tr%C3%A6tteberg&rft.au=Mork%2C+Tiril+Egset&rft.date=2025-08-29&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fbcp.70267&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_bcp_70267 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-5251&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-5251&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-5251&client=summon |