MPR selection to the OLSR quality of service in MANET using minmax algorithm

Optimized link state routing (OLSR) is a routing protocol that has a small delay, low traffic control, support the application of denser networks, and adopts the concept of multipoint relays (MPR). The problem of OLSR is routing table updating which continually causes excessive packet delivery, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca) Jg. 9; H. 1; S. 417
Hauptverfasser: Alamsyah, Alamsyah, Purnama, I Ketut Eddy, Setijadi, Eko, Purnomo, Mauridhi Hery
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Yogyakarta IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 01.02.2019
Schlagworte:
Algorithms
Computer simulation
Energy consumption
Nodes
Quality of service
Routing (telecommunications)
Topology
Traffic control
Traffic delay
ISSN:2088-8708, 2088-8708
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Optimized link state routing (OLSR) is a routing protocol that has a small delay, low traffic control, support the application of denser networks, and adopts the concept of multipoint relays (MPR). The problem of OLSR is routing table updating which continually causes excessive packet delivery, and energy consumption becomes increased. This article proposes the improvement of OLSR performance using the min-max algorithm based on the quality of service (QoS) with considering the density of the node. The Min-max algorithm works in selecting MPR nodes based on the largest signal range. The QoS parameters analyzed with a different number of nodes are packet delivery ratio (PDR), throughput, delay, energy consumption, and topology control (TC). Simulation result of network simulator version 2 (NS-2) shows that OLSR performance using the min-max algorithm can increase PDR of 91.17%, packet loss of 60.77% and reduce topology control packet of 8.07%, energy consumption of 16.82% compared with standard OLSR.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2088-8708
2088-8708
DOI:10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp417-425