Network Analysis and Legal Scholarship

In their contribution in this issue Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm use social network analysis to show that the European Court of Justice is a precedent-driven constitutional court that is comparable to the US Supreme Court with regard to the citation of precedents. The article and its use of net...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:German law journal Ročník 18; číslo 3; s. 695 - 700
Hlavní autori: Petersen, Niels, Towfigh, Emanuel V.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Toronto Cambridge University Press 01.05.2017
Predmet:
Analysis
Comparative law
Constitutional courts
Federal court decisions
International courts
Law
Precedents
Social justice
Social network analysis
Supreme courts
ISSN:2071-8322, 2071-8322
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract In their contribution in this issue Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm use social network analysis to show that the European Court of Justice is a precedent-driven constitutional court that is comparable to the US Supreme Court with regard to the citation of precedents. The article and its use of network analysis as a method provoked a lively debate on the editorial board of the German Law Journal about comparative law theory and methods generally and the place of empirical (including network) analyses in the comparative law discipline. For this reason, the editorial board commissioned this “special section” of contributions dedicated broadly to approaches to comparative law. In his essay in this section, for example, Jens Frankenreiter offers a detailed assessment of Derlén's and Lindholm's analysis. In this piece, we take a broader perspective and look at the utility and the limits of network analysis for legal scholarship generally.
AbstractList In their contribution in this issue Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm use social network analysis to show that the European Court of Justice is a precedent-driven constitutional court that is comparable to the US Supreme Court with regard to the citation of precedents. The article and its use of network analysis as a method provoked a lively debate on the editorial board of the German Law Journal about comparative law theory and methods generally and the place of empirical (including network) analyses in the comparative law discipline. For this reason, the editorial board commissioned this “special section” of contributions dedicated broadly to approaches to comparative law. In his essay in this section, for example, Jens Frankenreiter offers a detailed assessment of Derlén’s and Lindholm’s analysis. In this piece, we take a broader perspective and look at the utility and the limits of network analysis for legal scholarship generally.
In their contribution in this issue Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm use social network analysis to show that the European Court of Justice is a precedent-driven constitutional court that is comparable to the US Supreme Court with regard to the citation of precedents. The article and its use of network analysis as a method provoked a lively debate on the editorial board of the German Law Journal about comparative law theory and methods generally and the place of empirical (including network) analyses in the comparative law discipline. For this reason, the editorial board commissioned this “special section” of contributions dedicated broadly to approaches to comparative law. In his essay in this section, for example, Jens Frankenreiter offers a detailed assessment of Derlén's and Lindholm's analysis. In this piece, we take a broader perspective and look at the utility and the limits of network analysis for legal scholarship generally.
Author Towfigh, Emanuel V.
Petersen, Niels
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Niels
  surname: Petersen
  fullname: Petersen, Niels
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Emanuel V.
  surname: Towfigh
  fullname: Towfigh, Emanuel V.
BookMark eNp9kEtLw0AUhQepYFv9Ae4CgrvozJ1XsizFFwRdVNfhMrmxqTETZ1Kk_96GuhAFV-dyON_lcGZs0vmOGDsX_EpwYa9XwK3IJADnHECAOmLT0UpHb_LjPmGzGDecS6vBTNnlIw2fPrwliw7bXWxigl2VFPSKbbJya99iiOumP2XHNbaRzr51zl5ub56X92nxdPewXBSpAylUqiVaoZUjlKQNyMrWQhNWlPFMY2UNKIOUmyonQUqDRDIZGHSVcGhqJefs4vC3D_5jS3EoN34b9tViCdyIXCltx5Q9pFzwMQaqS9cMODS-GwI2bSl4OY5S_hllT4pfZB-adwy7f5gvHwZiyw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1086_717420
Cites_doi 10.1017/CBO9781107053762
10.1007/s13278-016-0365-6
10.1093/pan/mpm011
10.1017/S0007123411000433
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright German Law Journal 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright German Law Journal 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1017/S2071832200022124
DatabaseName CrossRef
PAIS Index
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
PAIS International (Ovid)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
DatabaseTitleList International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EISSN 2071-8322
EndPage 700
ExternalDocumentID 10_1017_S2071832200022124
GroupedDBID .4L
09C
09D
0R~
2-G
2WC
6DY
AABWE
AACLI
AAGFV
AALKF
AAOIO
AAPYI
AASVR
AAYXX
ABACO
ABFRF
ABGDZ
ABXHF
ACAJB
ACDLN
ACFCP
ACGFO
ACMJI
ADKIL
ADUOI
ADVJH
AEBAK
AEFWE
AEGXH
AFACB
AFKQG
AFKRZ
AFLVW
AFZFC
AGABE
AGHGI
AGJUD
AGTDA
AHRGI
AIAGR
AJPFC
AKMAY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOWSX
BBLKV
BHRNT
CCQAD
CITATION
CJCSC
DOHLZ
FM.
FRJ
FRS
GCT
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCSNT
HISYW
HOCAJ
HOVLH
IKXGN
IPYYG
JHPGK
JOSPZ
JRMXA
LGEZI
LMKDQ
LOTEE
LXHRH
M~E
NADUK
NXXTH
OK1
P2P
PQQKQ
RCA
RHO
ROL
RWL
RXW
TAA
TAC
TAF
TR2
UVLOZ
W2G
WFFJZ
X6Y
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-53a7154cea3e5623d7f15eade8085ad76246ae96d9e1e4523ae6826acd1ca6f43
ISSN 2071-8322
IngestDate Thu Nov 20 09:11:30 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:36:31 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:44:41 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
License https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2314-53a7154cea3e5623d7f15eade8085ad76246ae96d9e1e4523ae6826acd1ca6f43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E8C3D0AB58A01DD35C4B5DAC4893ACDF/S2071832200022124a.pdf/div-class-title-network-analysis-and-legal-scholarship-div.pdf
PQID 2061944574
PQPubID 2049688
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2061944574
crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_S2071832200022124
crossref_primary_10_1017_S2071832200022124
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Toronto
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Toronto
PublicationTitle German law journal
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Cambridge University Press
References S2071832200022124_ref13
S2071832200022124_ref11
S2071832200022124_ref3
S2071832200022124_ref2
S2071832200022124_ref1
S2071832200022124_ref7
Towfigh (S2071832200022124_ref10) 2009; 48
S2071832200022124_ref6
cr-split#-S2071832200022124_ref16.1
S2071832200022124_ref5
S2071832200022124_ref9
cr-split#-S2071832200022124_ref16.2
Siems (S2071832200022124_ref8) 2013; 21
Whalen (S2071832200022124_ref4) 2016; 2016
Petersen (S2071832200022124_ref12) 2013; 11
S2071832200022124_ref15
S2071832200022124_ref14
References_xml – volume: 48
  year: 2009
  ident: S2071832200022124_ref10
  publication-title: Komplexität und Normenklarheit — oder: Gesetze sind für Juristen gemacht
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref13
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107053762
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref3
  doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0365-6
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref6
  doi: 10.1093/pan/mpm011
– volume: 21
  year: 2013
  ident: S2071832200022124_ref8
  publication-title: Language, Legal Origins, and Culture Before the Courts: Cross-Citations Between Supreme Courts in Europe
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref11
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref5
– volume: 2016
  year: 2016
  ident: S2071832200022124_ref4
  publication-title: Legal Networks: The Promises and Challenges of Legal Network Analysis
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref7
  doi: 10.1017/S0007123411000433
– ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200022124_ref16.2
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref9
– ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200022124_ref16.1
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref1
– volume: 11
  year: 2013
  ident: S2071832200022124_ref12
  publication-title: Avoiding the Common Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref2
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref15
– ident: S2071832200022124_ref14
SSID ssj0037526
Score 2.0095959
Snippet In their contribution in this issue Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm use social network analysis to show that the European Court of Justice is a...
SourceID proquest
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 695
SubjectTerms Analysis
Comparative law
Constitutional courts
Federal court decisions
International courts
Law
Precedents
Social justice
Social network analysis
Supreme courts
Title Network Analysis and Legal Scholarship
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2061944574
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAEN
  databaseName: Cambridge University Press Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2071-8322
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037526
  issn: 2071-8322
  databaseCode: IKXGN
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/login
  providerName: Cambridge University Press
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2071-8322
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037526
  issn: 2071-8322
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20000101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV07T8MwELbawsCCeIpCQRkQA1VQkzhxvCAhVGAoEUNB3SLXdlGlKlR9T_x2znaSvgDRgSWKrOSi5EvuvnPO3yF06bkCAjvDtggDz8YSEtY2q2GbE0aJA96w3dZIN0gUha0WfSkUbrO1MJMeSZJwNqP9f4UaxgBstXR2A7hzozAA-wA6bAF22P4J-MgUds_lRtTUeEO-a9kPk8mmhcsZKX1U3jmp9ti0ungF028L6KHxTFHXKC9nk9Kdrvk9U4dzx7JXfbtZnEGAqJTX6xlH4wLNsNWXbWLCN2NrnnKeSGu3F5hGmWkEJVp7dN05p4pOyrSyrLV3HLOCelkIeyVA5WWDpiKNxGsmimjLJT5VXu35s55FYo_4ut1efi_ZX20lGb5qYpmXLIdlzTWae2g3TRKsOwPuPirI5AAVG2x6iK5SeK0MXgvgtTS81gK8R-j1od68f7LTXhc2B4aNbd9jBNgsl8yTipIK0nF8VcweAidmAkIWDpikgaDSkdh3PSYDyAwZFw5nQQd7x6iUfCTyBFmQ8QMrdISkvsAuCygWtMYJx8CEBdDvMqpldxrzVAhe9SPpxT8-3zK6zk_pGxWU3w6uZI8vTt_aYezW1HQZ9gk-3cTWGdqZv7EVVBoNxvIcbfPJqDscXGi0vwDg3VK_
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Network+Analysis+and+Legal+Scholarship&rft.jtitle=German+law+journal&rft.au=Petersen%2C+Niels&rft.au=Towfigh%2C+Emanuel+V.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.issn=2071-8322&rft.eissn=2071-8322&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=695&rft.epage=700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS2071832200022124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1017_S2071832200022124
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon