Groomers, gays, and gender ideology: Why the anti-LGBTQIA+ legislative backlash is a moral panic and why criminologists should care

In 2024, US state legislatures across the country introduced a record number of bills targeting LGBTQIA+ communities; according to the ACLU, 533 such bills were proposed, 49 of which passed into law. The past few years have seen a dramatic increase in formal attempts to criminalize and restrict quee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Punishment & society Jg. 27; H. 5; S. 959 - 983
1. Verfasser: Osborn, Max
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: London, England SAGE Publications 01.12.2025
Sage Publications Ltd
Schlagworte:
Animosity
Criminologists
Criteria
Fear & phobias
Gender
Gender roles
Health care access
Health services
Learning environment
Legislatures
LGBTQ people
Literature reviews
Moral panic
Public life
Sexuality
State legislatures
States
Transgender persons
Victimization
LGBTQ
moral panic
criminology
transgender
ISSN:1462-4745, 1741-3095
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2024, US state legislatures across the country introduced a record number of bills targeting LGBTQIA+ communities; according to the ACLU, 533 such bills were proposed, 49 of which passed into law. The past few years have seen a dramatic increase in formal attempts to criminalize and restrict queer and transgender people's rights, legal protections, access to healthcare, and participation in public life, as well as coverage of gender and sexuality in educational contexts. The rapid proliferation of these legislative efforts, and the intense animosity toward queer and trans people underpinning them, have led some to colloquially describe the situation as a moral panic. While these laws carry the potential for increased carceral system contact for queer and trans people and their allies, as well as facilitating violence toward these groups, criminologists have paid little attention to this issue thus far. This article reviews the sociological literature on moral panics and their component criteria, examines whether the recent rise in political and cultural targeting of LGBTQIA+ populations meets these criteria, and poses an argument for a criminological research agenda that incorporates a moral panic framework into examinations of anti-LGBTQIA+ harm and victimization.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1462-4745
1741-3095
DOI:10.1177/14624745251344568