Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Different Types of Composite Core Build-up Materials: An in vitro Study
The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the fracture strength and type of fracture in composite core build-up in restoration of endodonti-cally treated teeth with or without a prefabrica...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | The journal of contemporary dental practice Ročník 19; číslo 5; s. 507 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
India
01.05.2018
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1526-3711, 1526-3711 |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the fracture strength and type of fracture in composite core build-up in restoration of endodonti-cally treated teeth with or without a prefabricated metallic post.
A total of 60 freshly extracted mandibular premolars free of caries, cracks, or fractures were end-odontically treated and restored with composite core build-up with prefabricated metallic posts cemented with resin luting cement (group I) and without a post (group II). This was followed by a core build-up of 10 teeth each with three different types of composite materials: Hybrid composite, nanocomposite, and ormocer respectively. The samples were mounted on polyvinyl chloride block and then loaded in the universal load frame at 90° to the long axis of tooth. The fracture strength of the samples was directly obtained from the load indicator attached to the universal load frame.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed that teeth restored with post exhibited highest fracture strength (1552.32 N) and teeth restored without post exhibited lowest fracture strength (232.20 N). Bonferroni's test revealed that values for hybrid composite (Z-100, 3M ESPE) with post, nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) with post, ormocer composite (Admira-VOCO) with post, and nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) without post were not significantly different from each other.
Teeth restored with post and core using hybrid composite yielded the highest values for fracture strength. Teeth restored with ormocer core without post exhibited the lowest values. Teeth restored with nanocomposite core without post exhibited strength that was comparable with hybrid composite core but higher than that of ormocer.
Mutilated endodontically treated teeth can be prosthetically rehabilitated successfully by using adhesive composite core build-up along with post to meet anatomical, functional, and esthetic demands. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the fracture strength and type of fracture in composite core build-up in restoration of endodonti-cally treated teeth with or without a prefabricated metallic post.
A total of 60 freshly extracted mandibular premolars free of caries, cracks, or fractures were end-odontically treated and restored with composite core build-up with prefabricated metallic posts cemented with resin luting cement (group I) and without a post (group II). This was followed by a core build-up of 10 teeth each with three different types of composite materials: Hybrid composite, nanocomposite, and ormocer respectively. The samples were mounted on polyvinyl chloride block and then loaded in the universal load frame at 90° to the long axis of tooth. The fracture strength of the samples was directly obtained from the load indicator attached to the universal load frame.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed that teeth restored with post exhibited highest fracture strength (1552.32 N) and teeth restored without post exhibited lowest fracture strength (232.20 N). Bonferroni's test revealed that values for hybrid composite (Z-100, 3M ESPE) with post, nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) with post, ormocer composite (Admira-VOCO) with post, and nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) without post were not significantly different from each other.
Teeth restored with post and core using hybrid composite yielded the highest values for fracture strength. Teeth restored with ormocer core without post exhibited the lowest values. Teeth restored with nanocomposite core without post exhibited strength that was comparable with hybrid composite core but higher than that of ormocer.
Mutilated endodontically treated teeth can be prosthetically rehabilitated successfully by using adhesive composite core build-up along with post to meet anatomical, functional, and esthetic demands. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the fracture strength and type of fracture in composite core build-up in restoration of endodonti-cally treated teeth with or without a prefabricated metallic post.AIMThe aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the fracture strength and type of fracture in composite core build-up in restoration of endodonti-cally treated teeth with or without a prefabricated metallic post.A total of 60 freshly extracted mandibular premolars free of caries, cracks, or fractures were end-odontically treated and restored with composite core build-up with prefabricated metallic posts cemented with resin luting cement (group I) and without a post (group II). This was followed by a core build-up of 10 teeth each with three different types of composite materials: Hybrid composite, nanocomposite, and ormocer respectively. The samples were mounted on polyvinyl chloride block and then loaded in the universal load frame at 90° to the long axis of tooth. The fracture strength of the samples was directly obtained from the load indicator attached to the universal load frame.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 60 freshly extracted mandibular premolars free of caries, cracks, or fractures were end-odontically treated and restored with composite core build-up with prefabricated metallic posts cemented with resin luting cement (group I) and without a post (group II). This was followed by a core build-up of 10 teeth each with three different types of composite materials: Hybrid composite, nanocomposite, and ormocer respectively. The samples were mounted on polyvinyl chloride block and then loaded in the universal load frame at 90° to the long axis of tooth. The fracture strength of the samples was directly obtained from the load indicator attached to the universal load frame.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed that teeth restored with post exhibited highest fracture strength (1552.32 N) and teeth restored without post exhibited lowest fracture strength (232.20 N). Bonferroni's test revealed that values for hybrid composite (Z-100, 3M ESPE) with post, nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) with post, ormocer composite (Admira-VOCO) with post, and nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) without post were not significantly different from each other.RESULTSAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed that teeth restored with post exhibited highest fracture strength (1552.32 N) and teeth restored without post exhibited lowest fracture strength (232.20 N). Bonferroni's test revealed that values for hybrid composite (Z-100, 3M ESPE) with post, nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) with post, ormocer composite (Admira-VOCO) with post, and nanocomposite (Z-350, 3M ESPE) without post were not significantly different from each other.Teeth restored with post and core using hybrid composite yielded the highest values for fracture strength. Teeth restored with ormocer core without post exhibited the lowest values. Teeth restored with nanocomposite core without post exhibited strength that was comparable with hybrid composite core but higher than that of ormocer.CONCLUSIONTeeth restored with post and core using hybrid composite yielded the highest values for fracture strength. Teeth restored with ormocer core without post exhibited the lowest values. Teeth restored with nanocomposite core without post exhibited strength that was comparable with hybrid composite core but higher than that of ormocer.Mutilated endodontically treated teeth can be prosthetically rehabilitated successfully by using adhesive composite core build-up along with post to meet anatomical, functional, and esthetic demands.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEMutilated endodontically treated teeth can be prosthetically rehabilitated successfully by using adhesive composite core build-up along with post to meet anatomical, functional, and esthetic demands. |
| Author | Kulkarni, Dinraj Sesappa, Shetty R Mishra, Nitu Maiya, G R Ramakrishna Quadras, Dilip D Gowda, Srinivasa Kumar, Lalit |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Srinivasa surname: Gowda fullname: Gowda, Srinivasa email: pfasrinivasa@gmail.com organization: Department of Prosthodontics, Armed Forces Medical College Pune, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +919049866969, e-mail: pfasrinivasa@gmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Dilip D surname: Quadras fullname: Quadras, Dilip D organization: Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka India – sequence: 3 givenname: Shetty R surname: Sesappa fullname: Sesappa, Shetty R organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India – sequence: 4 givenname: G R Ramakrishna surname: Maiya fullname: Maiya, G R Ramakrishna organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India – sequence: 5 givenname: Lalit surname: Kumar fullname: Kumar, Lalit organization: Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Panjab University Chandigarh, India – sequence: 6 givenname: Dinraj surname: Kulkarni fullname: Kulkarni, Dinraj organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, M. A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre Pune, Maharashtra, India – sequence: 7 givenname: Nitu surname: Mishra fullname: Mishra, Nitu organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Modern Dental College & Research Centre, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkM1OwzAQhC1UBKXwCshHLgF7U8c1Nyi_EogD5RzZzRpcpXFw7Ep9e1xRJE47O_tpNNoTMup8h4Scc3YpGBNXq75Y-RQ63Q4FZwymBYDiB2TMBVRFKTkf_dPH5GQYVhkrQbIjcgxqxqQSakw2c7_uddDRbZDeb3SbsvQd9ZY-BL2MKSB9jwG7z_i1M--ctZjXSBfbHoedtUvwg4uYVaZvk2ubIvX0VUcMLhe8pjcddR3duBh8TkvN9pQc2nzBs_2ckI-H-8X8qXh5e3ye37wUS4AqFlxPlxIbgVwZA6IxDDnYpjKoVFUZZrVgymiopC3BgrSsNLPGcqmVEVZOYUIufnP74L8TDrFeu2GJbas79GmogU2rigkJKqPnezSZNTZ1H9xah2399yv4AY3Vcd0 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_polym13142251 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2291 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 1526-3711 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 29807959 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 2WC 53G 5GY AAWTL ACGFO ACZLU ADBBV ADFRT ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL DIK EBS EJD F5P NPM OK1 P2P PW6 SJN W2D XSB 7X8 OVT |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-1a4c7ed5e19bb25db0e12fd6be9966b0fa509ba267f32f27f03b8df17a9b5f742 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISSN | 1526-3711 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:36:51 EDT 2025 Fri May 24 00:03:20 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | Bonferroni's test Nanocomposite Ormocer Hybrid composite In vitro study |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c226t-1a4c7ed5e19bb25db0e12fd6be9966b0fa509ba267f32f27f03b8df17a9b5f742 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 29807959 |
| PQID | 2046605729 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2046605729 pubmed_primary_29807959 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2018-May-01 20180501 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2018 text: 2018-May-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | India |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: India |
| PublicationTitle | The journal of contemporary dental practice |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Contemp Dent Pract |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| SSID | ssj0023270 |
| Score | 2.1486459 |
| Snippet | The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture strength of three types of composite core build-up materials. The objectives were to study and evaluate the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 507 |
| Title | Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Different Types of Composite Core Build-up Materials: An in vitro Study |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807959 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2046605729 |
| Volume | 19 |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELaAIsHC-1FeMhKrReLEicOCSh9iadUBpG6RndhQhqQ0aSX-PXdJWiYkJJYospLIOl_s73yf7yPkDoK1SCTWZygazXwZCBYFxmeBNaljpO95wlZiE-FoJCeTaNxsuBUNrXI1J1YTdZonuEcOQbofAPQGLPg4-2SoGoXZ1UZCY5O0PIAySOkKJ-ssAoCFSiwOlqgAfiTXrU8IC3C8-48ZawarYFiFFDrLI_d3mFktN4P9_3b0gOw1QJN2as84JBsmOyI7PSQHob7bMVl2fwp_0_666DfNLR3g0anF3FDMWWdv5Ts29hoplZJi7FpgE34BSV8G7uDpJ5TYZosZHaqyduwH2snoNKPLaTnPKXIWv07I66D_0n1mjQoDSwCalcxVfhKaVBg30pqLVDvG5TYNtMFQSTtWAebQigeh9bjloXU8LVPrhirSwkLkfUq2sjwz54RK6SqeGEAFHOM6K4VWNlFY1d3xIiPa5HZl0hi8HFMXKjP5ooh_jNomZ_W4xLO6HEfMI-mgYvrFH96-JLuAeGTNWLwiLQumMNdkO1mC8ec3lfvAdTQefgOLkNDX |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+Evaluation+of+Fracture+Strength+of+Different+Types+of+Composite+Core+Build-up+Materials%3A+An+in+vitro+Study&rft.jtitle=The+journal+of+contemporary+dental+practice&rft.au=Gowda%2C+Srinivasa&rft.au=Quadras%2C+Dilip+D&rft.au=Sesappa%2C+Shetty+R&rft.au=Maiya%2C+G+R+Ramakrishna&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.issn=1526-3711&rft.eissn=1526-3711&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=507&rft_id=info:doi/10.5005%2Fjp-journals-10024-2291&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-3711&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-3711&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-3711&client=summon |