Proof Systems for Reasoning about Computation Errors

In the paper we examine the use of non-classical truth values for dealing with computation errors in program specification and validation. In that context, 3-valued McCarthy logic is suitable for handling lazy sequential computation, while 3-valued Kleene logic can be used for reasoning about parall...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Studia logica Ročník 91; číslo 2; s. 273 - 293
Hlavní autori: Avron, Arnon, Konikowska, Beata
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Dordrecht Springer 01.03.2009
Springer Netherlands
Predmet:
ISSN:0039-3215, 1572-8730
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:In the paper we examine the use of non-classical truth values for dealing with computation errors in program specification and validation. In that context, 3-valued McCarthy logic is suitable for handling lazy sequential computation, while 3-valued Kleene logic can be used for reasoning about parallel computation. If we want to be able to deal with both strategies without distinguishing between them, we combine Kleene and McCarthy logics into a logic based on a non-deterministic, 3-valued matrix, incorporating both options as a non-deterministic choice. If the two strategies are to be distinguished, Kleene and McCarthy logics are combined into a logic based on a 4-valued deterministic matrix featuring two kinds of computation errors which correspond to the two computation strategies described above. For the resulting logics, we provide sound and complete calculi of ordinary, two-valued sequents.
ISSN:0039-3215
1572-8730
DOI:10.1007/s11225-009-9175-4