PLUS-M Mobility Values of Osseointegration Patients: How Do Osseointegration Limb Replacement Prosthesis Users Compare to Traditional Socket Amputee Prosthesis Users?

The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users to normative published Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) values for traditional socket prosthesis users. The secondary aim was to investigate whether patient factors were predictive of PLU...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation Ročník 104; číslo 8; s. 687
Hlavní autoři: Page, Brian Joseph, Sheridan, Gerard A, Greenstein, Michael D, Hoellwarth, Jason S, Reif, Taylor J, Rozbruch, S Robert
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.08.2025
Témata:
ISSN:1537-7385, 1537-7385
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users to normative published Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) values for traditional socket prosthesis users. The secondary aim was to investigate whether patient factors were predictive of PLUS-M scores. Retrospective review of all patients who underwent osseointegration maintained in a prospectively maintained registry. All patients ( N = 63) were invited to complete a PLUS-M survey. Thirty patients completed the survey (15 femoral osseointegration, 15 tibial osseointegration). The osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users cohort's composite median scores and interquartile ranges for the PLUS-M Raw Score, PLUS-M T-score, and PLUS-M percentile score were 57 (46-60), T-score 62.5 (51.275-71.4), and 89.5 (54.95-98.4). PLUS-M T-scores were higher in the osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users compared with the age and etiology matched literature-reported outcomes in traditional socket prosthesis users for above-knee ( P = 0.027) and below-knee ( P = 0.029) amputees. Tibial osseointegration scores were slightly higher than femur osseointegration scores but did not reach statistical significance. PLUS-M raw ( P = 0.047) and PLUS-M percentile scores ( P = 0.041) were significantly improved for younger patients at the time index amputation. Regression analysis supported this finding. Osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users demonstrate improved functional mobility outcome scores relative to traditional socket prosthesis users. PLUS-M functional scores were improved for younger patients at time of index amputation.
AbstractList The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users to normative published Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) values for traditional socket prosthesis users. The secondary aim was to investigate whether patient factors were predictive of PLUS-M scores. Retrospective review of all patients who underwent osseointegration maintained in a prospectively maintained registry. All patients ( N = 63) were invited to complete a PLUS-M survey. Thirty patients completed the survey (15 femoral osseointegration, 15 tibial osseointegration). The osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users cohort's composite median scores and interquartile ranges for the PLUS-M Raw Score, PLUS-M T-score, and PLUS-M percentile score were 57 (46-60), T-score 62.5 (51.275-71.4), and 89.5 (54.95-98.4). PLUS-M T-scores were higher in the osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users compared with the age and etiology matched literature-reported outcomes in traditional socket prosthesis users for above-knee ( P = 0.027) and below-knee ( P = 0.029) amputees. Tibial osseointegration scores were slightly higher than femur osseointegration scores but did not reach statistical significance. PLUS-M raw ( P = 0.047) and PLUS-M percentile scores ( P = 0.041) were significantly improved for younger patients at the time index amputation. Regression analysis supported this finding. Osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users demonstrate improved functional mobility outcome scores relative to traditional socket prosthesis users. PLUS-M functional scores were improved for younger patients at time of index amputation.
The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users (OI-LRPU) to normative published PLUS-M values for traditional socket prosthesis users (TSPU). The secondary aim was to investigate whether patient factors were predictive of PLUS-M scores.OBJECTIVEThe primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users (OI-LRPU) to normative published PLUS-M values for traditional socket prosthesis users (TSPU). The secondary aim was to investigate whether patient factors were predictive of PLUS-M scores.Retrospective review of all patients who underwent OI maintained in a prospectively maintained registry. All patients (N = 63) were invited to complete a PLUS-M survey. 30 patients completed the survey (15 femoral OI, 15 tibial OI).DESIGNRetrospective review of all patients who underwent OI maintained in a prospectively maintained registry. All patients (N = 63) were invited to complete a PLUS-M survey. 30 patients completed the survey (15 femoral OI, 15 tibial OI).The OI-LRPU cohort's composite median scores and inter-quartile ranges for the PLUS-M Raw Score, PLUS-M T-score, and PLUS-M percentile score were 57 (46-60), T-score 62.5 (51.275 - 71.4) and 89.5 (54.95 - 98.4). PLUS-M T-scores were higher in the OI-LRPU compared with the age and etiology matched literature-reported outcomes in TSPU for above-knee (p = 0.027) and below-knee (p = 0.029) amputees. Tibial OI scores were slightly higher than femur OI scores but did not reach statistical significance. PLUS-M raw (p = 0.047) and PLUS-M percentile scores (p = 0.041) were significantly improved for younger patients at the time index amputation. Regression analysis supported this finding.RESULTSThe OI-LRPU cohort's composite median scores and inter-quartile ranges for the PLUS-M Raw Score, PLUS-M T-score, and PLUS-M percentile score were 57 (46-60), T-score 62.5 (51.275 - 71.4) and 89.5 (54.95 - 98.4). PLUS-M T-scores were higher in the OI-LRPU compared with the age and etiology matched literature-reported outcomes in TSPU for above-knee (p = 0.027) and below-knee (p = 0.029) amputees. Tibial OI scores were slightly higher than femur OI scores but did not reach statistical significance. PLUS-M raw (p = 0.047) and PLUS-M percentile scores (p = 0.041) were significantly improved for younger patients at the time index amputation. Regression analysis supported this finding.OI-LRPU demonstrate improved functional mobility outcome scores relative to TSPU. PLUS-M functional scores were improved for younger patients at time of index amputation.CONCLUSIONSOI-LRPU demonstrate improved functional mobility outcome scores relative to TSPU. PLUS-M functional scores were improved for younger patients at time of index amputation.
Author Rozbruch, S Robert
Page, Brian Joseph
Sheridan, Gerard A
Reif, Taylor J
Hoellwarth, Jason S
Greenstein, Michael D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Brian Joseph
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8636-8249
  surname: Page
  fullname: Page, Brian Joseph
  organization: From the Hospital for Special Surgery and New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Orthopaedic Trauma Service, New York, New York
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Gerard A
  surname: Sheridan
  fullname: Sheridan, Gerard A
  organization: University Hospital Galway, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Galway, Ireland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Michael D
  surname: Greenstein
  fullname: Greenstein, Michael D
  organization: University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jason S
  surname: Hoellwarth
  fullname: Hoellwarth, Jason S
  organization: Hospital for Special Surgery, Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, New York, New York
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Taylor J
  surname: Reif
  fullname: Reif, Taylor J
  organization: Hospital for Special Surgery, Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, New York, New York
– sequence: 6
  givenname: S Robert
  surname: Rozbruch
  fullname: Rozbruch, S Robert
  organization: Hospital for Special Surgery, Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, New York, New York
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39679539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNplkM1Og0AUhSdGY3_0DYyZpRsqzDAM48Y09acmNCW2dUsGuOgoMMgMMX0hn1OMNWnSuzl38Z2z-EbouNY1IHThuRPPFfw6ni8m7t6RIGRHaOgxyh1OQ3a89w_QyJj3HmKC8lM0oCLgglExRN9xtFk5C7zQqSqV3eIXWXZgsC7w0hjQqrbw2kqrdI3jPqC25gbP9Re-04dEpKoUP0NTygyqHsVxq419A6MM3hhoDZ7pqpEtYKvxupW5-q3JEq909gEWT6umswAHtdszdFLI0sD5Lsdo83C_ns2daPn4NJtGTkaIyxyfuTJz05ATVoiApCBCGhAKwg2YpAUHTv3c81mYh1KK3JeU-C4XgUy5XxQyJWN09bfbtPqz92CTSpkMylLWoDuTUM_vNVPq8x693KFdWkGeNK2qZLtN_t2SH3J2gMk
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002685
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1537-7385
ExternalDocumentID 39679539
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID -~X
.-D
.L3
.Z2
01R
0R~
1J1
23M
354
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
71W
77Y
7O~
85S
A9M
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAKFR
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAWTL
AAXQO
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACNWC
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNVM
AE6
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
BOYCO
BQLVK
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
H~9
I6D
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
N9A
NEJ
NPM
N~7
N~B
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
OHH
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
ONU
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
R2J
RLZ
RXW
S4R
S4S
TAF
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XFW
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
YZZ
ZFV
ZY1
7X8
ADKSD
ADSXY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2205-450ac0b8725f962be983623e9065a3f7e734d1458d8aa9d4a3240796ab74ffab2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1537-7385
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 06:18:53 EDT 2025
Fri Aug 01 03:41:36 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Osseointegration
Osseointegration Limb Replacement Surgery
Osseointegration Limb Replacement Prosthesis Users
Traditional Socket Prosthesis User
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2205-450ac0b8725f962be983623e9065a3f7e734d1458d8aa9d4a3240796ab74ffab2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-8636-8249
PMID 39679539
PQID 3146853347
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3146853347
pubmed_primary_39679539
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20250800
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 8
  year: 2025
  text: 20250800
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Phys Med Rehabil
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0005937
Score 2.439849
Snippet The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users to normative published Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility...
The primary aim of this study was to compare osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users (OI-LRPU) to normative published PLUS-M values for traditional...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 687
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Amputation, Surgical - rehabilitation
Amputees - rehabilitation
Artificial Limbs
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osseointegration - physiology
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Tibia
Title PLUS-M Mobility Values of Osseointegration Patients: How Do Osseointegration Limb Replacement Prosthesis Users Compare to Traditional Socket Amputee Prosthesis Users?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39679539
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3146853347
Volume 104
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ1LT-MwEICt5XHgAmyBXdiHBgm4RYQkjmMuVVVR9dB2I2hRb5Xjh6i0W8OmC-IP8TsZO4kAoZVW2hxy8iiWZjye2DPfEHJEVcxTqc4c-lIGSUJxSWFUG8RFmhrNTailh7gO2GiUTac8rw_cyjqtsvGJ3lErK90Z-WnsaoRc3Shr394FrmuUu12tW2iskLUYQxln1Wz6Qgun3DMzcVGzwFFbmtI5zk7z_rBCF9ZPlGb070Gm32x6W_87zW2yWYeZ0Kns4iP5oBctcvwaKQzjiicAJ3D5htbdIlt5rbxmzA55ygeTq2AIQ-sHPsK1-ImzAmvgR1lq21AnUB7yCtVankPfPoCy70cM5r8K_KrPB3Onk5C72pMbXc5LmLjyT-hWqfGwtIC7qZrXc75C762X0PGdKPQ7sfYumfQuxt1-ULd4CKSr8A0SGgoZFhmLqOFpVGie4Y4aa46RkYgN0yxO1BlakMqE4CoRjh_IeCoKlhgjimiPrC7sQn8mkFKqIxRkPBSJTFUWFoYX-H8mIwxzFN8nh43GZriE3L2IWGj7p5y96GyffKrUPrutWB8ztGTGacwP_kH6C9mIXHdgnx74lawZdCD6G1mX98t5-fu7t018j_LhM1_58Ks
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PLUS-M+Mobility+Values+of+Osseointegration+Patients%3A+How+Do+Osseointegration+Limb+Replacement+Prosthesis+Users+Compare+to+Traditional+Socket+Amputee+Prosthesis+Users%3F&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+physical+medicine+%26+rehabilitation&rft.au=Page%2C+Brian+Joseph&rft.au=Sheridan%2C+Gerard+A&rft.au=Greenstein%2C+Michael+D&rft.au=Hoellwarth%2C+Jason+S&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.eissn=1537-7385&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FPHM.0000000000002685&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39679539&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39679539&rft.externalDocID=39679539
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1537-7385&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1537-7385&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1537-7385&client=summon